节点文献

地震学方法预报效能的统计与分析——中短期前兆及预报效能评价之四

Statistics and analysis of prediction efficiency of seismological methods——Part 4 of mid-short-term precursor and prediction efficiency evaluation

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 朱令人洪时中陈棋福郑兆苾王琼

【Author】 ZHU Ling-ren~1,HONG Shi-zhong~2,CHEN Qi-fu~3,ZHENG Zhao-bi~4,WANG Qiong~1(1.Earthquake Administration of Xinjiang Urumqi Autonomous Region,Urumqi 830011;2.Earthquake Administration of Chengdu City,Sichuan Province,Chengdu 610015;3.Institute of Earthquake Science,CEA,Beijing 100036;4.Earthquake Administration of Anhui Province,Hefei 230031,China)

【机构】 新疆维吾尔自治区地震局成都市地震局中国地震局地震预测研究所安徽省地震局新疆维吾尔自治区地震局 新疆乌鲁木齐830011四川成都610015北京100036安徽合肥230031新疆乌鲁木齐830011

【摘要】 对地震学一部分预报方法进行回顾性预报和实际地震预报的效能评价验算,前者可反映预报方法可能具有的最好效果,后者则反映现实预报的状况和水平。回顾性预报的效能评价表明几种方法都能通过检验,是有效的。而实际地震预报效能验算的结果是,通不过检验:无论是有震预报,还是无震预报,在15%置信水平下所有的方法都通不过检验。

【Abstract】 The article makes retrospect prediction of some prediction methods based on seismology and checking computation of efficiency evaluation of real earthquake prediction.The former may reflect the best potential effect of prediction methods,and the latter shows status and level of real earthquake prediction.Efficiency evaluation of retrospect prediction shows that several methods pass the test and are efficient.Checking computation of real earthquake prediction efficiency cannot pass the test,i.e.whether the prediction with earthquake occurrence and prediction without earthquake occurrence,all methods have not past the test on the confidence level of 15 per cent.

【基金】 “九五”地震科技攻关项目(96-913-01-05)
  • 【分类号】P315.7;
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】71
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络