【摘要】 作为现代公权理论的核心,保护规范理论对于主观公权利的证成具有决定性。随着历史的发展,保护规范理论的新旧两种见解得以形成。但保护规范理论立基于存疑的原理:作为保护规范理论基础的利益概念并不明确,公益与私益的区分颇有疑问;法规范的解释方法与解释规则并不确定;保护规范理论在适用上也存在相当的不确定性。有鉴于此,应当对证成主观公权利进行方向性的调整,转而关注与保护规范理论相异的行政法律关系理论。在证成主观公权利时,法律关系理论依据调整法律关系的所有规范材料,注重行政法与宪法的一体式观察,同时兼顾各规范调整领域的具体事实结构。法律关系理论吸收了保护规范理论的合理见解,排除了其中具有不确定性的内容,从而确保主观公权利的证成具有规范性与可靠性。更多还原

【Abstract】 As the core of the theory of modern subjective public right,the protective norm theory is decisive for the justification of subjective public rights.With the development of history,both new and old views of the protective norm theory have been formed.However,the protective norm theory is based on the principles of doubt.First of all,as the basis of the protective norm theory,the concept of interest is not clear,and the distinction between public interests and private interests is questionable.Secondly,the interpretation methods and interpretation rules of legal norms are uncertain.Meanwhile,there is considerable uncertainty in application of the protective norm theory.In view of this,another new adjustment should be made to justify subjective public rights.Therefore,it is necessary to focus on the legal relationship theory which is different from the protective norm theory.In the process of justifying subjective public rights,the legal relationship theory is based on all normative materials of legal relationship.Apart from this,it pays attention to the integrated observation of the administrative law and constitutional law and takes the specific factual structure of each law field into account.The legal relationship theory absorbs the reasonable opinions of the protective norm theory and excludes the contents with uncertainty,so as to ensure the normativity and reliability of the justification of subjective public rights.更多还原