节点文献

一维土层非线性地震反应分析的解析递推格式法

Analytical Recursion Scheme Method of the Nonlinear Earthquake Response Analysis of One-Dimension Soil Layer

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 甘杨李凡李大华

【Author】 GAN Yang~1,LI Fan~2,LI Da-hua~(2,3)1.Urban and Rural Planning and Research Institute of Jilin Province,Changchun 130061,China2.Tianjin Urban Construction Institute,Tianjin 300381,China3.Tianjin Seismological Bureau,Tianjin 300201,China

【机构】 吉林省城乡规划设计研究院天津城市建设学院天津城市建设学院 长春130061天津300381天津市地震局天津300201

【摘要】 引入“结构动力学数值分析解析递推格式法”求解软土地基地震反应分析问题。就一维地基非线性地震反应分析问题,将解析递推格式方法与等效线性化方法在各种场地土的计算结果进行了比较,结果表明:(1)对软土层地震反应分析时,两种方法计算结果差别较大;(2)入射波幅值较强时,两种方法计算结果差别较大;(3)对于中等硬度土层、入射波幅值较弱时,计算结果相似,并验证了该方法的实用有效性。

【Abstract】 A digital algorithm-analytical recursion scheme method for the structural dynamics to solve the earthquake response problem of the soft clay foundation is put forwarded.From the outcomes of the research,the analytical recursion scheme method can obtain more accurate calculating results.It is a general numerical algorithm in nonlinear vibration problem,especially suits for the seismic response analysis of soft clay foundation.For one-dimension earthquake response analysis of soft clay foundation,a more sufficient comparison is taken between the analytical recursion scheme method and the(equivalent) linear method for the result of account in manifold ground.The outcomes show:(1) In the soft soil seismic response analysis,the difference between these two methods is relatively greater;(2) When the value of the inputting earthquake waves are greater,the difference between these two methods is relatively greater;(3)For the medium hardness soil layer earthquake waves was stronger,the two methods got similar results.The validity of the proposed analysis method and computer program has been verified.

【基金】 中国地震局地震科学联合基金资助项目(103001)
  • 【文献出处】 吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ,Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2006年04期
  • 【分类号】TU435
  • 【被引频次】7
  • 【下载频次】164
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络