【摘要】 认罪协商程序有助于诉讼效率的提高,兼顾追诉犯罪与保障人权的双重需要,具有强大的生机与活力。我国认罪认罚从宽制度与认罪协商程序存在不同,盖因在移植过程中面临三重困境:传统诉讼文化的困境、科层制下的道德困境、现行法律规范适用的困境。认罪认罚从宽从试点到正式写入刑事诉讼法,制度运行逐渐成熟,所面临的三重困境部分层面得以纾解。认罪协商程序在当前刑事司法环境下,理应继续推进本土化进程,一方面应保留其提高诉讼效率、保障人权的价值功能,另一方面又要兼顾保障被害人权益、维护社会安全稳定等方面的现实需要,在实质意义上增进社会正义。更多还原

【Abstract】 The plea bargaining mechanism is helpful to improve the efficiency of the lawsuit, so it is full of vigor and vitality, taking into the account of the double needs of pursuing crimes and protecting human rights.However, there exist differences between the lenient punishment system for confession and plea bargaining,for three dilemmas occur in the process of transplantation: the dilemma of the traditional litigation culture, the moral dilemma under the bureaucratic system, and the dilemma of the application of the current legal norms.From the trial to the criminal procedure law, the system operation of lenient punishment for confession has been gradually mature, and some aspects of the triple predicament have been relieved. In the current criminal justice environment, the plea bargaining should continue to promote the localization process. On one hand, it should retain its value function of improving the efficiency of litigation and protecting human rights. On the other hand, it should take into consideration the practical needs of protecting the rights and interests of victims and maintaining social security and stability so as to enhance social justice in a substantial sense.更多还原