节点文献

两类地震风险评估模型的对比与讨论

COMPARISON OF TWO MODELS FOR SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 杨文涛汪明史培军

【Author】 YANG Wentao1,2,3) WANG Ming1,2) SHI Peijun1,2)(1)State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology,Beijing Normal University,100875,Beijing,China; 2) Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management,Ministry of Civil Affairs & Ministry of Education,Beijing Normal University,100875,Beijing,China; 3) College of Earth and Environmental Sciences,Lanzhou University,730000,Lanzhou,China)

【机构】 北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室民政部-教育部减灾与应急管理研究院兰州大学资源环境学院

【摘要】 回顾了传统的地震危险性评估的方法,介绍了基于离散事件仿真的地震风险评估方法,并以云南省永胜县为例,运用2类不同的方法对永胜县面临的地震风险进行了计算,得到了永胜县的地震烈度超越概率曲线.结果显示2类不同评估方法的结果有着很高的吻合度;结合保险行业地震风险管理的实际需求进一步讨论了基于离散事件的地震模型的优点及其合理性.

【Abstract】 This paper reviewed traditional method of seismic risk analysis,then introduced a discrete event-based simulation method.Yongsheng County in Yunnan Province was chosen as a case for study.These two methods were tested by calculating seismic hazard risks in Yongsheng and a comparison was made of the results in the form of exceeding probability(EP) curves.Data showed that these two methods generated relatively consistent EP curves.The paper considered the practical needs of insurance industry,then discussed advantages and rationality of event-based simulation method.

【基金】 科技部国际科技合作项目资助(2010DFB);地标过程与资源生态国家重点实验室团队重点资助项目
  • 【文献出处】 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版) ,Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2011年05期
  • 【分类号】P315.9
  • 【下载频次】346
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络