【作者】 季翠霞；

【导师】 谭帆；

【作者基本信息】 华东师范大学 ， 中国各体文学理论， 2010， 博士

【摘要】 阮大铖为明末戏曲家、诗人、政客,终生未获高位却位列明史《奸臣传》,又为大有才华的封建文人。对阮大铖及其传奇作品展开研究,需对阮大铖其人所处的政治历史环境以及阮大铖传奇所处的文化环境进行整体观照。客观环境和主观志向的合力作用造就了十分特殊的封建文人政客阮大铖,阮大铖自身深厚文学底蕴和特殊遭际影响了阮大铖的传奇作品。论文以阮大铖传奇作品为研究对象,试图在已有定论的前提下,将其放回当时的历史大环境中,在明末的大背景下对阮大铖传奇进行整体观照,以阮大铖传奇创作与演出为中心展开研究。论文采取“散点透视”的角度,强化问题意识,思路紧紧围绕阮大铖传奇进行发散式的展开,以阮大铖传奇为中心,梳理明末清初戏曲发展之线索和规律。研究内容包括：阮大铖南京活动及其传奇创作,传奇创作及其演出,阮大铖的文学形象与历史形象,阮大铖与临川派的渊源关系,阮大铖与李渔的承续关系及其异同点,等等。各章内容安排如下：绪论,综合论述阮大铖其人其传奇作品及二者之间的关联,论文各部分内容具体安排。第一章,南京与石巢四种的创作。描摹阮大铖谋求起复谈兵说剑流连诗酒挑灯作传奇的南京生活。第二章,阮大铖传奇接受述略。以文本接受和演出接受两个方面分别论述阮大铖传奇的接受,可以看出,其接受也明显受到因人论文的影响。第三章,阮大铖历史形象与文学形象。阮大铖历史形象与文学形象不存在歧义问题,基本一致。通过明末至清中叶的数部史书,亦史亦文的历史演义历史剧等概论阮大铖的历史形象和文学形象。第四章,文采意趣：阮大铖与临川派。临川派存在与否有争议,将阮大铖归入临川派,也有争议,或者也有其道理。第五章,世俗化与通俗性：阮大铖与李渔。阮大铖与李渔传奇为文人传奇,内容较薄弱,而在形式方面均有创新,在世俗化方面有很大突破。余论：功利性阮大铖传奇的首要特性。功利的阮大铖使得阮大铖传奇具有明显的功利性特点,值得特为拈出。更多还原

【Abstract】 Ruan Dacheng, a dramatist, poet and politician of the late period of the Ming Dynasty, hadn’t had a high post all his life but as a brilliant feudal talent. He was included in The Biography of Evil Officials. It takes an overall attention to the political and historical environment where he lived and the cultural environment where his legends were created to study Ruan Dacheng as well as his Drama. The objective environment and the subjective ambition jointly made RuanDacheng outstanding. In turn, his profound knowledge of literature and unique experience had a great influence on his Drama.With an already conclusion, the essay centered on Ruan Dacheng’s Drama, makes an attempt to set it in the then history environment to study. It also mainly deals with the various works in the late period of the Ming Dynasty and focused on his writing and performances. From dispersive points of view, the essay strengthened awareness of the problem with the main idea developing closely around the legend of RuanDacheng in an emanative way. Centered on the legend of RuanDacheng, it also teased out the development and law of the drama during the period between the late Ming Dynasty and the early Qing Dynasty. The research includes the following:RuanDacheng’s activities in Nanjing and his legendary creation, RuanDacheng’s legendary creation and its performances, RuanDacheng’s literature images and history images, the relationship between RuanDacheng and Linchuan genre, the successive ties and differences and similarities between RuanDacheng and LiYu. Each chapter is organized as follows:ChapterⅠNanjing and the Creation of Four Kinds of Stone Nest. It mainly talks about RuanDacheng’s life in Nanjing when he was busy with military training while doing some writing in attempt for rebuilding the Ming Dynasty. ChapterⅡThe Description of the sources greatly influencing RuanDacheng’s works. It mainly deals with the great influence on RuanDacheng’s works from two aspects, that is the text influence and performance influence.obviously, to a large degree, it is affected by the idea of judging a legend by personality. ChapterⅢRuanDacheng’s history image and literature image. There’s no divergence of views about RuanDacheng’s history image and literature image. This chapter roughly deals with them by studying history books of the period between the late Ming Dynasty and the early Qing Dynasty. ChapterⅣLiterary Talent and appretiation. There has been an argument about LinChuan genre’s existence. There’s also an argument about whether RuanDacheng should be classified into LinChuan genre.Maybe it is reasonable. ChapterⅤSecularization and Popularity. The legend about RuanDacheng and LiYu is one about scholars. There being not much in statement, it has a great progress in innovation and many breakthroughs in Secularization. Postscript Utilitarianism, the primary feature of RuanDacheng’s legend.Utilitation, RuanDacheng attaches apparent utilitarianism to the legend, which is especially worth talking about.更多还原