【作者】 陈长利；

【导师】 张帆；

【作者基本信息】 华东师范大学 ， 文艺学， 2010， 博士

【摘要】 新千年以来,在破除“本质主义”迷信、反思“文化研究”不足之后,重新审视事物之间的普遍联系和关系价值成为文学理论发展的内在要求。本文认为,文学本性的认识应该有三个基本维度,即文学接受、文学形式、意识形态。论文以综合性视角和系统的方法,从关系反思和理论建构的意图出发,以历史上出现的“五种”文学基本观念即“模仿说”、“实用说”、“表现说”、“客观说”、“接受说”为讨论的场域,分别从形式观念、关系形态、原因阐释三个层面,主要探讨了文学接受、文学形式、意识形态三者之间的“五种”复杂关系构成,即“传达关系”、“表述关系”、“审美关系”、“客体关系”和“自反关系”。全文除导言和结论外,共分为六章内容。第一章讨论的是文学形式、意识形态、文学接受三个核心范畴和相关理论认识问题。关于文学形式讨论的主要问题有,我国当代文学理论对文学形式认识的主要观点是什么?当前文学形式的理解困境是什么?该怎样重新认识文学形式?关于意识形态讨论的主要问题有,传统理论对意识形态的认识的主要线索是什么?在当代意识形态理解遇到了什么困难?该怎样重新理解意识形态?关于文学接受讨论的主要问题有,文学接受在传统理论中是否发挥作用和作用是什么?该如何认识“期待视野”这一接受美学“方法论顶梁柱”的理论有效性问题?在实际应用中对“期待视野”的确定方法可能会有哪些?第二章讨论的是“模仿说”下文学接受、传达形式与意识形态三者关系问题。首先,从文学形式观念层面,讨论了何谓“模仿说”下的总体形式观念“传达形式”?其表现形式主要有哪些?它们之间可能存在什么样的关联?其次,从“三者”关系层面,讨论了“传达关系”的三种主要表现形态,即“自然社会理性传达关系”、“宗教神学信仰传达关系”、“人文主义理性传达关系”。再次,对“传达关系”得以形成的原因加以阐释,问题包括：是什么构成了“传达关系”得以形成的“绝对性”话语权威?口头传播如何影响了“传达关系”的传达方式?为什么说“对等思维”水平下的“世界观念”阅读期待是“传达关系”得以形成的主体性条件?第三章讨论的是“实用说”下文学接受、表述形式、意识形态三者关系问题。首先,从文学形式观念层面,讨论了何谓“实用说”下的总体形式观念“表述形式”?其表现形式主要有哪些?它们之间是什么关系?其次,从“三者”关系层面,讨论了“表述关系”的三种主要形态,即“修辞层表述关系”、“类型层表述关系”、“中心层表述关系”。再次,对“表述关系”得以形成的原因加以阐释,问题包括：王权政治如何建立起“表述关系”得以产生的“社会性”话语权威?自然人性和世俗观念如何影响了“表述关系”的表述方式?为什么说“定向思维”水平下的“趣味”阅读心理是“表述关系”得以形成的主体性条件?第四章讨论的是“表现说”下的文学接受、审美形式与意识形态之间的关系。首先,从文学形式观念层面,讨论了何谓“表现说”下的总体形式观念“审美形式”?其表现形式主要有哪些?它们之间有什么关系?其次,从“三者”关系层面,讨论了“审美关系”的三种主要表现形态,即“中介审美关系”、“实践审美关系”、“理性审美关系”。再次,对“审美关系”得以形成的原因加以阐释,问题包括：“个人主义”意识形态如何确立起“审美关系”得以产生的“主体性”话语权威?社会表述危机如何在“立法之人”上得到调节并表现在文学领域?为什么说“闭合思维”水平下的“反思性直觉”是“审美关系”得以形成的主体性条件?第五章讨论的是“客观说”下的文学接受、客体形式与意识形态三者关系。首先,从文学形式现象层面,讨论了何谓“客观说”下的总体形式观念“客体形式”?其“表现形式”主要有哪些?它们之间是什么关系?其次,从“三者”关系层面,讨论了“客体关系”三种表现形态,即“不透明客体关系”、“透明性客体关系”、“半透明客体关系”。再次,对“客体关系”得以形成的原因加以阐释,问题包括：现代社会“工具理性”如何确立起“客体关系”得以形成的“无意识结构”话语权威?文学学科独立如何影响了文学客体的存在方式?为什么说“形式思维”水平下的“文本深蕴”期待是“客体关系”得以形成的主体性条件?第六章讨论的是“接受说”下的文学接受、自反形式与意识形态三者间关系。在引言部分,简要讨论了“客观说”之后有没有一种新的基本文学观念产生?该怎样理解“接受说”?接下来讨论的是,首先,从文学形式观念层面,讨论了何谓“接受说”下的总体形式观念“自反形式”?其表现形式主要有哪些?它们之间有着什么样的关系?其次,从“三者”关系层面,讨论了“自反关系”的三种主要表现形态,即“消解性自反关系”、“交流性自反关系”、“生产性自反关系”。再次,对“自反关系”得以形成的原因加以阐释,问题包括：当代“文化主导”如何确立起“自反关系”得以形成的“对话性”话语权威?新的“范式”转移如何影响了“自反关系”的经验维度的形成?为什么说“逆转思维”水平下的“对话交流”期待是“自反关系”得以形成的主体性条件?结论部分：对五种文学观念之间的关系加以简要评述总结,提出走向“关系诗学”的思想主张。更多还原

【Abstract】 Since the millennium, the "Essentialism" superstition has been broken away and the bias of culture study has also been reflected. After that, the development of literary theory itself requires to re-emphasize the general links and relation value among things. The dissertation believes that the nature of literature should be understood from the following three basic dimensions:literary reception, literary form and ideology. The dissertation by a comprehensive perspective and systems theory point of view, systematically discussed the five complex relations which exist in literary reception, literary form and ideology with the intention of reflection of relation and theory construction. These five relations are interpretations are:interpretation relationship, representation relationship, aesthetic relationship, objective relationship and relationship of self-confrontation. The discussion has been made in the following basic fields:imitation theory, practical theory, performance theory, object theory and reception theory which are five literary concepts in the history from three levels: concept of forms, relational forms and interpretation of the causes.The whole dissertation consists of six chapters besides introduction and conclusion.The first chapter discusses three core areas:literary form, ideology and literary reception, and related theoretical understanding. As for literary form, the following questions will be introduced. What are the main understandings on literary form in Chinese traditional theory? What is the difficulty in understanding on literary form contemporarily? How should literary form be re-understood? As for ideology, the following questions are involved. What are the main clues of understanding on ideology in traditional theory? What problems do understanding of ideology come across contemporarily? How should understanding of ideology be re-recognized? As for literary reception, in includes the following questions. Does literary reception take effects in traditional theory? What are these effects? Horizon of expectation is the methodology pillar in reception aesthetics. But it suffers the dilemma of theoretical validity. How should such problem be coped with? In practice, how many ways can be used to define the horizon of expectation?The second chapter discusses the relationships among literary reception, interpretation forms and ideology in the imitation theory. At first, what the interpretation form of overall formal concept is in the imitation theory will be introduced in the level of literary form. What are the forms of interpretation form? What are the possible links between interpretation form and its forms? Then, three main manifestations of interpretation form will be analyzed from the level of relationship. They are interpretation relation of rationality of natural society, interpretation relation of belief in religious theology and interpretation relation of human rationality. What the main mechanisms which form the interpretation are will be analyzed from the underlying causes for the formation of interpretation relation. The analysis involves with the following questions:What is it that helps interpretation relation become the absolute discourse authority? How does oral mode of transmission make interpretation relation effectively carry out? Why does the reading horizon of expectation for world view with peer thinking become the subjective conditions for the formation of interpretation relation?The third chapter discusses the relationships among literary reception, representation forms and ideology with the practice theory. Firstly, what the interpretation form of overall formal concept is with the practice theory from the level of literary form? How many manifestations are there? What is the relationship in them? Secondly, three main morphologies of representation relation have been introduced from the level of relationship. Finally, what the main mechanisms which help form the representative relation are will be discussed from the level of underlying causes of relation. How does politics of kingship construct social discourse authority which forms representation relations? How do natural humanity and secular view affect representation ways of representation relation? Why does the reading psychology of expectation for fun in the directed thinking become subjective condition of interpretation relation?The fourth chapter discusses the relationships among literary reception, aesthetic forms and ideology in the performance theory. As usual, firstly, what aesthetic forms of overall formal concept are in performance theory will be introduced from the level of literary forms. What are the manifestations? What are the relationships in them? Secondly, from the level of their relationships, three main representative forms of aesthetic relation will be introduced:intermediary aesthetic relation, practical aesthetic relation and rational aesthetic relation. Thirdly, what the main mechanisms are will be discussed? These mechanisms help the aesthetic relation form. How does individualism ideology set up the subjective discourse authority which makes aesthetic relation form? How the social crisis of representation get adjusted in "legislative person" and reflected in the literature? Why odes the reading psychology of expectation for reference to writer’s aesthetic experiences become the subjective condition under the level of closed thinking?The fifth chapter discusses the relationships existing in literary object, object form and ideology in the objective theory. Firstly, what the objective form of overall formal concept in object theory will be explained in the level of literary form. What are their manifestations? And what are the relationships among them? Secondly, from the angle of their relationships, three manifestations of object relation will be introduced. They are:opaque object relation, transparency object relation, translucent object relation. Thirdly, what the main mechanisms are will be explained from the underlying causes of relation formation? These mechanisms form the object relation. How does instrumental rationality in modern society set up discourse authority of unconscious structure help object relation form? Literature subjects independently how to affect the object way of "object relations"? Why does the reading psychology of connotation expectation for deep text in the level of formal thinking become the subjective condition for formation of object relation? The sixth chapter discusses the relationships among literary reception, form of self-confrontation and ideology in the reception theory. In the introduction, it tries to discuss whether there is a new literary concept or not after the object theory. How to understand reception theory? Then, what the form of self-confrontation of overall formal concept in reception theory is will be discusses from the aspect of literary form. What are the manifestations of relation of self-confrontation? What are the relationships in them? Furthermore, on the basis of their relationships, three manifestations will be introduced:deconstructive form of self-confrontation, communicative form of self-confrontation and productive form of self-confrontation. At last, what the mechanisms help relation form of self-confrontation will be explained from the angle of underlying causes of relation formation. How does culture-led define the conversational discourse authority? How does transmission of new paradigm greatly affect affect the self-confrontation way of "relation of self-confrontation "? Why does the reading psychology of expectation for discourse communication in the level of reversal thinking become the subjective condition for the formation of relation of self-confrontation?In conclusion, The author believes that five types of literary concept don not separate with each other, while there must be a progressive procedure of understanding on the nature of literature. The author also believes theoretical advocate of the tendency of relational poetics has been put forth in this dissertation.更多还原