节点文献

《郡斋读书志》研究

The Study about Junzhai Dushu Zhi

【作者】 杨大忠

【导师】 张子侠;

【作者基本信息】 安徽大学 , 历史文献学, 2010, 博士

【摘要】 晁公武是两宋之交的著名藏书家和目录学家,其所著《郡斋读书志》是我国第一部现仍传世的私人解题目录。《郡斋读书志》著录图书丰富,考订精审,尤其在辨伪学方面有着重要的成就。晁公武身处两宋之交,一方面受到汉唐以来辨伪余绪的影响,同时又亲承宋代辨伪思潮的涤荡,其在《郡斋读书志》解题的撰写中将辨伪作为重要内容之一就成为自然的事了。从现存目录学著作来看,《郡斋读书志》是第一部运用充分证据辨伪的古典目录学著作。公武辨伪,从范围上来看,遍及经、史、子、集四部。晁氏使用的辨伪之法共有十二种之多,且有些已经超过了明胡应麟和梁启超理论归纳的范畴。晁氏首疑或首辨的伪书、伪文在数量上也是相当可观的,这为后人继续辨伪起了首开其端的作用。有些伪书现已佚去,但通过《读书志》的记载,今人仍能见其大致面目。有些伪书虽然不是晁氏首辨,但公武却为此提供了相当充分的证据,令人信服不已。此外,晁公武在《读书志》中还初步认识到伪书的价值。对于晁公武在辨伪学史上卓而不群的地位,今人当有着客观公正的认识。1990年,上海古籍出版社刊行了孙猛先生校证的《郡斋读书志校证》一书,为《郡斋读书志》作了标点、合校、疏证、考订等方面的工作。此书考订详实,内容丰富,为后人继续研究《读书志》提供了极大的方便,实为研究《读书志》的集大成之作,被誉为“晁氏之功臣、学界之福音”。然此书刊行至今,光阴已过二十年。其间学界新成果层出不穷,对《读书志》的相关解题作了新的补充和订谬;由于《读书志》的1400多条解题中蕴涵的文献信息太过丰富,孙猛先生对《读书志》所作的《校证》,也不可能面面俱到,其间也遗漏了一些重要的内容,或因考订不够精审而偶有瑕疵;后人引用《读书志》之解题,经常发生张冠李戴的错误,纠谬订讹,实属必要;从史源说的角度对《读书志》解题进行探源,发现其出处,从而对《读书志》的内容追根溯源,意义也很重大。故本文特撰《(郡斋读书志校证)补证》一章。此外,前人对晁公武的佚文辑录可谓完备,然遗漏了晁公武的三则佚文,本文对此加以补充;对后世目录引用《读书志》之语发生的错讹,本文对此集订正。

【Abstract】 Chao Gongwu is a very famous collectors and bibliographers at the turn of Beisong and Nansong, his book, "Junzhai Dushu Zhi" is the first private recorded existing bibliographer book and is rich in textual research intensive review, particularly in the False Identification has a significant achievement. Chaogong Wu Song lived at the turn of Beisong and Nansong,he had been affected by the impact of discrimination fromHan to Tong,mean the while,he was washed by discrimination thoughts in Song, so it is natural for him to stress discrimination in Junzhai Dushu Zhi. Junzhai Dushu Zhi is the first Discrimination Bibliography works using the full evidence to discriminate. From the scope of view,Chao Gongwu use a total of 12 kinds to criminate and some of them have more than the scope of inductive theory by Hu Yinglin and Liang Qichao. Those books and articals suspected by Chao Gongwu is very considerable in number, which played a very important role for future generations to continue study. Some books has been lost, but by the recording from Junzhai Dushu Zhi, people still reflected in its general features today. Althou some false books was not identified by Chao in the first time,Chao provised quite sufficient evidence, it is convincing endless. In addition, Chao Gongwu recognized the initial value of false books. People today must understand the status about Chao Gongwu in discrimination history with an objective and fair attitude.In 1990, Junzhai Dushu Zhi Jiaozheng has been published written by Sun Meng through Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, which punctuate、circulate、certificate and identify Junzhai Dushu Zhi. The book is very sufficient in identification and the content is very rich and it offers great convenience for future generations to continue to study. As a informative book, Jiaozheng is known as "the hero and gospel in scholars".But the book published more than 20 years, during the time, new achievement relating to solve problems and provide false is more and more, meanwhile,because of more than 1400 items in Junzhai Dushu Zhi,Mr Sun Meng can not cover ererything and that there is some missing important content is still lost,or for those trial and the occasional textual research is not enough sperm defects;so descendants reference the contents from Junzhai Dushu Zhi frequently mistaken identity of error correcting wrong, Corrections is necessary. From the perspective of the history of the source to find the content in Dushu Zhi is important for us to correct the meaning.In addition, it is very complete for predecessors to select those lost articles by Chao Gongwu, however omitted three Lost articles have been found by I and this should be added.meanwhile, those mistakes in using Dushu Zhi and Zhizhai Shulu Jieti must be revised.

  • 【网络出版投稿人】 安徽大学
  • 【网络出版年期】2010年 10期
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络