【作者】 岳洪江；

【导师】 刘思峰；

【作者基本信息】 南京航空航天大学 ， 管理科学与工程， 2008， 博士

【摘要】 管理科学自20世纪初形成以来,已发展成为具有庞大知识体系的研究领域,在人类文明进程和知识宝库中占有重要地位。改革开放同步我国管理科学研究的繁荣进程也就20多年,我国的管理科学研究及管理实践与国际先进水平还有一定差距,本文拟针对日益成熟的学科发展对严密的学术研究及研究范式的需要,分析我国管理科学研究的现状和规律,为提高中国管理科学研究水平提出有价值的建议。本研究借助词频分析、共现分析方法等科学计量学理论与方法,以及社会网络分析方法,对国内外管理科学的学科结构及演进、国内管理科学知识扩散网络与学科交叉、中国管理科学研究队伍及合作者的年龄结构、管理科学基金资助项目与其支持环境的匹配合理性进行了研究。从国际管理科学研究所呈现的关键词结构及演变看,国际管理科学已形成了一套核心学术语言。从高被引作者关系结构及演变看,组织理论研究作者群和组织行为及人力资源管理研究作者群联系密切,理论发展也较稳定,而战略管理研究作者群联系较分散,理论发展更新较快。从中国管理科学研究所呈现的关键词结构及演变看,中外管理科学研究的侧重点明显不同,主要是围绕着中国体制的变迁而变,研究的范围及其广泛。管理期刊共被引网络不具有很强的凝聚力,期刊大体可以归为四个族类。随着时间的推移,管理科学期刊知识交流网络密度在增大,学科分支领域在趋于融合,期刊引证间存在“无形学院”,在各共同体中有其核心成员。以引文网络作为反映学科知识交流的表征,揭示了管理科学各领域与其它社会科学领域之间的知识交流模式。管理科学研究队伍年龄结构为青年峰的偏单峰分布,35岁以下的第一作者已占据半壁河山且保持稳定发展。学生作者(特别是博士生)是发表管理科学论文的重要群体,构成了中国管理科学队伍的年轻化趋势。二人和三人合作是我国管理科学领域最主要的科学合作形式,青年-中老、青年-老年、中年-青年-老年、青年-中年-青年是常见的二人和三人合作年龄结构,师生之间的合作研究是最主要的合作形式。国家自然科学管理科学基金与管理科学论文地域的比较研究发现二者总体分布规律方面是一致的,也存在微观层次协调对应方面的问题。管理科学基金项目负责人及成员正在趋于年轻化、高职称和高学位化,项目负责人经历了单峰(老年峰)—双峰(青年峰、老年峰)—单峰(青年峰)发布的变动过程。管理科学研究队伍也正在向年轻化、高学位和高职称化结构方向发展。国家自然科学基金资助的管理科学项目组成员与我国管理科学研究队伍主体在年龄、职称和学位结构的演变中具有宏观一致性。更多还原

【Abstract】 Management has been 100 years of history in America. There was only more than 20 years in China. it is a certain gap between China’s management and internation management in scientific research and management practices. It is important to investigate the whole situation of management to promote of China’s management. Based on the integrated methods of scientometrics and social network analysis, the author try to reveal the structure and evolution in the field of internation management science and representative scientists, the structure and evolution, communication of discipline knowledge, age structure of author, sciences foundation in the field of China management sciences.From the present structure and evolution of the key words , the internation management science has developed a core set of academic language. From the structure and evolution of highly-cited authors of relations, author group of organization theory research and organization behavior have a respective tight link, but author group of strategic management is more decentralized.From the present structure and evolution of key words, Chinese and foreign management of scientific research focused on distinctly different. Management science of China mainly centered on the changes in China’s system changed, the scope of the research object is extensive.The journal co-citation network does not have a strong cohesion. Journals can be roughly classified as four categories.An examination of a management science community was discussed by using social network analyses on the citation network. It show that the exchange of knowledge of management science journals in the network density increases and community was more direct and open. The network has maintained relative stability, but it also has some obvious changes. These journals can be considered to be the "invisible college" that has core members. Four disciplines of management science citation patterns are examined, it show that the decision-making system journals is knowledge sources that other management field of science journals absorb. Interdisciplinary communication between management science and 10 social science fields are also examined, results showed the central position of economics is apparent in this citation network.The age structure of the authors of management papers is the unimodal age distribution with higher peak of young men, proportion of first author of below 35-year-old make up to 50% and could keep stable. Author of students (especially doctoral candidates) are major groups the management of scientific papers published in.The younger trends of research personnel are due to increasing proportion of students. For two-author collaboration, Younger-Middle-ager and Younger-Elder are the predominant age structure; For three-author collaboration, Middle-ager -Younger-Younger and Younger-Middle-ager-Younger are the most important age structures. Tutor-student are main patterns of scientific collaboration in management.The similarity and difference of regional distributions between management science publication and NSFC’s management science fund are compared. The similar distribution rule is found, but there is also micro-level incoordination. The distribution structure and trends of age, professional title and academic degree are compared between investigators of management projects of NSFC and personnel of management research. The results showed the investigators of management projects of NSFC are tending to younger, high professional title and high degree, at the same time, the distribution structure and trends of age, professional title and academic degree of personnel of management research are changing. The analysis revealed that the trend in investigators of management projects of NSFC was accord with personnel of management research.更多还原