【作者】 吴云；

【导师】 沈济黄；

【作者基本信息】 浙江大学 ， 建筑设计及其理论， 2009， 博士

【摘要】 历史文化街区的保护是一项复杂艰巨的工作。从影响因素角度,它涉及到制度、技术、观念等诸多方面。从保护开展角度,它表现为称号申报、规划编制、规划落实、后续管理、学术研究等诸多环节。其中,调查研究工作既是保护开展的环节之一,渗入其他诸多环节,其成果的科学与否也是历史文化街区保护成功与否的关键影响因素之一。调查研究的成果是确定被调查研究区域是否符合条件被授予历史文化街区称号的依据,是历史文化街区称号授予后保护措施制定的依据,也是保护措施实施若干时间后检验保护方向和力度的依据。所以对于历史文化街区的保护工作而言,调查研究的好坏,将直接影响保护的成效。当前我国历史文化街区的保护,还未形成一套健全的调查研究工作体系。对于调查研究成果的科学性也少有评价,更缺乏学术支持。作为历史文化街区保护工作坚实基础和首要步骤的调查研究工作亟待完善。作者通过留学日本一年时间的研究学习发现,日本针对历史文化街区类型历史文化遗产保护的“传统建造物群保存地区”制度,在调查研究阶段有具体落实形式,即“传统建造物群保存对策调查”。它是日本历史文化街区保护工作开展的首要步骤和必要前提。“传统建造物群保存对策调查”工作体系以其独立完善的运行流程,系统、全面、深入的调查研究内容设定,客观先进的调查研究方法运用,确保了针对不同历史文化街区的各个调查研究成果的权威性、科学性,从而为后续的保护措施制定和落实提供了强有力的保障;日本历史文化街区保护调查研究工作完善的体系,给我国历史文化街区保护调查研究工作体系的进一步健全以重要启示。本文在比较研究我国和日本历史文化街区保护中,调查研究工作的制度建设、实践操作、成果表现等现状的基础上,以我国的现状为立足点,结合系统论的观点,以及历史文化遗产保护的相关理论,尝试在我国历史文化街区保护制度中建立完善的调查研究工作体系。该体系通过资金保障机制,程序机制,以及调查研究内容导向机制三方面共同作用,确保调查研究工作的有效开展,确保调查研究成果的科学呈现。在调查研究工作的政策引导,资金扶助,人员构成与职权所属,调查研究内容设定和对应内容的方法使用及成果表达等方面有具体的可操作的办法;通过中日比较,本文特别强调提高我国历史文化街区调查研究工作的权威性。为保证权威性,借鉴日本“传统建造物群保存对策调查”运作流程和我国各项保护工作流程,架构程序机制对调查研究过程进行监督管理外,进一步借鉴当前我国建设工程项目中可行性研究工作的开展模式,建立调查研究成果的审批制度;通过中日比较,本文还特别强调提高调查研究成果的科学性和其在后续保护工作中的可操作性。为保证科学性和可操作性,首先在理论依据和现实依据的双重作用下架构全面、深入的调查研究内容框架,明晰各项内容的设立目的。一方面参考中日实例,引入客观、先进的调查研究方法,并规范化调查研究成果的表达方式。更多还原

【Abstract】 The protection of the historical district is a complicated and arduous work. As from impact factors, it involves various aspects such as system, technique, concept and so on. As from the carrying out of protection activities, it contains a lot of processes such as declaration for the title "the historical district", the making of protection planning, the implementation of protection planning, the following-up management and the academic research etc. Among them, the work of investigation on the historical district is one important process, which has a deep connection with the other processes. The result of investigation is one of the key impact factors on whether the protection on the historical district is successful or not. It is the basis of determining whether the investigated district matches to be declared as "the historical district" or not. Further more, It is the basis for drawing up the protective measures after the declaration. In the end, It is also the basis of the examination for the direction and the strength of the protection after the protective measures carried out for a certain period of time. So for the protection of the historical district, the quality of the investigation will directly influence the result.Currently the historical district protection in our country has not form a set of sound investigation working system. There is no evaluation system for the result of investigation, no academic support either. As the solid foundation and initial step of the historical district protection, the investigation work must be speedily improved.Through a study in Japan for one year, the author realized that "The investigation for preservation measures of historical buildings" is one specific method in preserving "the preservation district of historical buildings", which is among the Japanese historical districts preservation system. As the first step and precondition of the historical district preservation system in Japan, the independent and perfect operational process, settings of systemic, overall, thorough contents, and exercises of objective and advanced research methods in "The investigation for preservation measures of historical buildings"ensures the authority and scientificalness of the investigation result from different districts. Thus it provides a powerful guarantee to the following-up establishment and implementation of the protective measures. The specific and perfect system of the investigation in Japanese historical districts has provided a good inspiration for a sound system of investigation in our country.Based on the comparative research between Chinese and Japanese on the actuality of investigation work system constructions, practical operations, performances of investigation results etc, based on the current situation of our country underlying the historical district protection, and combined the standpoint of system theory and other related theories about historical-cultural heritage protection, this thesis tries to build up a integrated investigation work system in the historical district protection in our country. Through three aspects: funds guarantee mechanism, procedure mechanism, and investigation contents-leading mechanism, this system insures to make the investigation effectively and scientificly. For the policy leading, the funds assistance, the personnel constitution and their authorities, the content settings, the research methods, the result expressions and so on, this system has the specific and exercisable measures.By the comparative research between China and Japan, this thesis specially emphasizes the authority of the investigation in the historical district protection in our country. ]n order to assure this authority, through drawing lessons from the operational processes of "The investigation for preservation measures of historical building" in Japan and various protective workflows in China, the procedure mechanism is structured to supervise the investigation processes. Draw lessons from the running mode of the feasibility study for capital construction projects in our country, the examination and approval system on the investigation result is established further.By the comparative research between China and Japan, this thesis also specially emphasizes the scientificity of the investigation result the maneuverability of the result within the follow-up protective work. In order to assure the scientificity and maneuverability, the overall, thorough contents frame for investigation is built and the investigation purpose of each content is clarified in consideration of the protection theories and the current situation. Further more, some objective and advanced methods of investigation are introduced and some expression methods of the investigation result are normalized.更多还原