【作者】 王秀丽；

【导师】 刘电芝；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 高等教育学， 2008， 博士

【摘要】 团队学习是当前教育改革的一个重要方向,它不仅有助于学生的学业进步、改善人际关系、增进教育之幸福感,同时,也能增强团队合作能力,帮助他们适应当前社会的团队工作模式并为此做好准备。相对于中小学阶段,大学阶段的团队学习研究相当不充分。已有研究缺乏对大学生关于团队合作态度的基本调查研究,而态度一直以来被视为预测行为的最好途径;对于影响大学生团队学习效果的众多因素缺乏系统性的思考,并且,有关的实证研究远远落后于思辨性的理论阐述;关于团队学习的干预研究更加鲜见。针对已有研究的不足,本研究首先对当前大学生的内隐与外显合作态度进行了调查研究;在科学地评估学习团队有效性的基础上,探索并分析影响团队学习的关键性因素及其相互关系,在一定程度上揭示了大学生团队学习的有效运行机制;采用教学实验对大学生的合作行为进行了培育研究。本研究力图使大学生团队学习研究由零星纷乱的状态逐渐走向系统而深入的研究,并为在高校引进团队学习模式提供思路与借鉴。本研究的主要结论如下:1.采用语义分化量表和内隐联想测验两种方法,分别对大学生的外显与内隐合作态度进行了测量,以期更有力地解释态度与行为之间的关系。总体来看,大学生对合作持积极态度,但外显与内隐态度不完全一致。在外显态度上,大学生对于合作没有表现出特别的偏好,合作与单干的得分都比较高;而在内隐态度上,相对于自己单干,大学生明显地更加倾向于与人合作。虽然喜欢合作并不意味着会合作,但是这种积极的态度为团队学习在高校的推广以及合作行为的培养奠定了良好基础。2.采用现场研究,考察了影响大学生团队学习的主要因素,包括团队过程(沟通、支持、领导和搭便车)、团队心智模型(团队认知、任务认知正确性、一致性、团队效能感和任务关心度)等诸变量及其之间的相互关系。回归分析结果表明:(1)沟通、支持和搭便车三个团队过程变量是影响团队学习效果的重要行为因素。沟通与支持对团队成绩有显著的正向影响,沟通的影响力更大。对于团队成员满意度,支持和沟通对其产生积极影响,搭便车则是一个消极影响因素。(2)团队心智模型中的任务认知正确性、任务关心度和团队效能感三个成分是影响团队有效性的重要心理因素。从认知的角度来看,任务认知正确性对于团队成绩和成员满意度都是重要的影响因素;从信念的角度来看,任务关心度对团队成绩有重要影响,而团队效能感对团队成员的满意度有积极影响。(3)团队过程变量对学习团队的有效性产生直接影响,团队心智模型以团队过程变量为中介,对团队有效性产生间接影响。3.依据以上以及前人研究结果,采用实验组前后测实验设计,对大学生的团队合作行为进行培育研究。通过合作行为问卷调查,合作态度的内隐联想测验,以及学生作业分析等多个方面对训练效果进行综合评价。此部分主要探讨了以下内容:(1)编制了考察大学生合作行为调查问卷。问卷由责任担当、帮助支持、包容和资源共享四个维度构成,经信度和效度检验,该问卷可以作为评价大学生合作行为训练效果的有效评价工具。采用该问卷调查结果表明,对于合作行为低分者的训练效果非常显著,对于合作行为高分者也有积极影响。(2)通过对学生作业的质性分析,发现合作行为训练对大学生产生了许多其他方面的积极影响。如,更深刻地认识到团队合作的意义,提高了与人交往与合作的能力,以及由此产生了友情、默契、自豪、快乐和满意感等积极情感。(3)合作训练对大学生内隐合作态度没有影响。研究揭示,训练前后的内隐联想测验结果没有差别,表明内隐态度是比较稳定的。这种短期的训练还不足以改变人在长期的社会生活中形成的思维与行为倾向。更多还原

【Abstract】 Team learning is an important director of current innovation on education. Team learning can promotes achievement of students, improve interpersonal relationship, strengthen capacity of cooperation, and be prepared for team work in present society. Compared with team learning of primary and middle school students, research on that of college students is quite insufficient. Investigation and research on cooperation attitude of college students are lack, which have been regarded as one of best predictors of behaviors. Most of the researches on team learning are qualitative, and the demonstration is seldom. Moreover, researches on factors affecting team learning and training of cooperative behaviors are very inadequate. Aimed at shortcomings of previous studies, this research investigates implicit and explicit attitude of cooperation of college students, reveals working mechanism of team learning by exploring key factors affecting team learning and the relationship between them, and carries out the training of cooperative behaviors through instructional experiment. The researcher aims at changing the current researches on team learning from odd and disorderly state into systematic and comprehensive research, and provides idea and experience for introducing and spreading team learning in colleges.The main results of this research are as follows:1. In order to interpret the relationship between attitude and behaviors, explicit and implicit attitudes of cooperation of college students are measured with semantic differential questionnaire and implicit association test. Students have no orientation for cooperation in explicit attitude, and both scores of working together and working by oneself are higher than intermediate score. Yet in implicit attitude, they prefer working together instead of working by oneself. Although being fond of cooperation does not mean being able to cooperate with each other, positive attitudes of cooperation lay a sound foundation for training of cooperative behaviors,2. The research explores key factors that affect study team effectiveness and the relationship between them. Antecedent variables included team process variables (communication, back up behaviors, leadership and free riding) and team mental model (team cognition, correctness and identity of tusk cognition, team efficacy and tusk concern). Results of regression analysis follow:(1) Communication, back up behaviors, and free riding are behaviors influencing factors of learning team effectiveness. Team grade and satisfaction degree of team members are two criteria of study team effectiveness. Communication and back up behaviors are positive predictors of team grade, and communication has stronger power. To the satisfaction degree of team members, communication and back up behaviors have positive influence, and free riding has negative influence.(2) The three elements of team mental model, including correctness of tusk cognition, tusk concern and team efficacy, are mental influencing factors of team effectiveness. From angle of cognition, correctness of tusk cognition has significant influence to both team grade and satisfaction degree of team members. From angle of conviction, tusk concern is important predictor of team grade, and team efficacy is important predictor of satisfaction degree of team members.(3) Team process variables mediated the relationship between team mental model and team effectiveness, and so they are direct predictors of study team effectiveness.3. On the basis of the previous and the present research, training of cooperative behaviors is carried out through experiment. Effectiveness of training is assessed through questionnaire, implicit association test of cooperation attitude, and analysis of student autobiography.(1) Cooperative behaviors questionnaire of college students is developed, and the reliability and validity of that are tested. The investigations reveal that effectiveness of training is significant to both the low level and the high level students on cooperative behaviors.(2) Qualitative analysis of student autobiography reveals that the training of cooperative behaviors increases a lot of positive influence to students. For instance, they understand better the meaning of cooperation, increase the ability of association and cooperation, and they feel friendship, tacit understanding each other, pride and happiness.(3) The training has no significant influence to implicit cooperation attitude. Results of pretest and posttest of implicit association test are of the same. Therefore, implicit attitude is stabler than explicit one, and short-term training can not change thinking and behaving tendency formed in long-term social life.更多还原