节点文献

文化遗产的价值评估及记录建档

Evaluation and Documentation in Cultural Heritage Conservation

【作者】 黄明玉

【导师】 蔡达峰;

【作者基本信息】 复旦大学 , 文物学, 2009, 博士

【摘要】 文化遗产保护是关注文化意义与独特性的专门领域,而价值的理解与评估是其首要与核心工作,可以说,保护文化遗产的目标即在于保护其文化价值。近年来,学界对遗产价值的认识已有多元化的扩展,并且以此议题为核心界定了遗产保护领域能为保护文化多样性做出的贡献。同时,价值概念也能作为整合遗产领域跨学科性质研究的工具,并使遗产保护从狭义的技术保存提升为涵盖社会、文化、经济脉络的领域,而作为纳入各种参与的社会事务。就我国遗产保护工作而言,在理论与实务上都需要整合上述的遗产价值视野,以推进相关的理论建设与应用实践。本研究即是基于上述背景与动机,在遗产保护规划框架下探索价值评估涉及的价值体系理论、评价制度与方法、以及相关的记录建档。得出成果如下:一、以分析历年来文化遗产概念的变化为起点,从中理出价值认识的演进过程,以及遗产概念与价值表述的要素,也发现我国遗产法规存在的概念问题。由于评估中的文化与价值概念都属于争议较多的词汇,故从相关的学科梳理了其意涵,并说明遗产领域承继的意涵内容。二、对保护规划中的价值评估方法学展开论述,说明其步骤程序和相关工具,着重介绍了我国遗产评估工作较不熟悉的人类学民族志方法。阐明真实性概念与价值评估的关系,并回顾了遗产价值理论的相关文献,分析我国遗产价值理论问题,提出以下建议:应扩充价值类型;在评价中导入针对性概念:在价值评估过程中应反省精英决策现象、应有跨学科合作机制、应考虑利益相关者问题;应思考遗产保护与社会脉络之关系;应重视真实性概念。三、通过对比国内外遗产评价制度与专业标准,以及价值评估案例,除分析国外与台湾地区相关制度与操作实例的借鉴意义,也对我国遗产价值评估工作提出建议:应建构价值评估方法学、应明确定位经济价值、专业标准应独立于保护法规、应建立遗产申报或提名审议程序、应有公众参与机制并考虑利益相关者问题。四、阐明了与价值评估相关的记录建档概念与原则,对比国内外记录建档的专业标准,分析两处我国文物保护单位之价值评估记录情况后,对我国遗产价值评估记录建档工作提出建议:应阐述遗产记录建档的概念并强调其重要性、应建立记录建档的原则与方法、记录建档应与保护程序整合并呈现价值评估结果。

【Abstract】 Cultural Heritage Conservation is the specific field deals with cultural significance and uniqueness, with the understanding and assessment of values as its primary task. The purpose of heritage conservation is to preserve the cultural significance. In recent decades, the field has extended the cognition of heritage values in a wide variety, and situated value issues as the key point for the field to make a contribution toward preserving cultural diversity for humankind. The concept of values are also means for the field to integrate the interdisciplinary researches in conservation planning process, and to broaden the meaning of conservation, from technical intervention to a social practice containing public participation and considerations of cultural, economic and social contexts. Such perspectives of heritage values are also of benefit to the conservation work of China in both theoretical and practical aspects. Based on the background and incentive, the dissertation attempts to explore the methodology of evaluation, in the framework of conservation planning, involving the related theories, institution, and methods, also the relevant documentation. My main work is as following:1. To analyze the development of heritage concepts and value understanding in order to find out the elements about expression of heritage concept and significance. To exposit the concepts of culture, value and valuation, since they are always in debate, in the appropriate contexts for conservation.2. To discuss the procedure and tools for evaluation in heritage conservation and introduce the corresponding anthropology-ethnographic methods. To state the significance of authenticity in evaluation and make an overall review of evaluation-related literatures, and set forth some suggestions for the field of conservation in China.3. To compare the domestic institution, specific criteria of heritage evaluation with those foreign and study several cases of heritage evaluation for eliciting the advanced ideas and methods that worth for reference. Based on the comparison, attempt to put forward an evaluation procedure and a form that contains essential data, value typology and criteria, also some other suggestions for the practice of assessing cultural values in China.4. To exposit the sphere and principles of documentation relevant to evaluation, and compare the domestic involved regulations and guidelines with the standards and guidelines of the U.S. Followed two case studies and make some advices for the evaluation-related documentation in our conservation practice.

  • 【网络出版投稿人】 复旦大学
  • 【网络出版年期】2010年 02期
  • 【分类号】G122
  • 【被引频次】36
  • 【下载频次】2715
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络