【作者】 贺苗；

【导师】 衣俊卿；

【作者基本信息】 黑龙江大学 ， 马克思主义哲学， 2009， 博士

【摘要】 本文主要是在日常生活批判的视域内,将人们熟知而非真知的日常思维纳入研究视野,系统地考察日常思维的基本图式和生成机制,并结合现代性问题和中国社会的文化转型,反思中国的现代化与日常思维的变革,试图建构起适合中国日常思维的批判和重建模式,从而促进人自身的现代化。论文主要采用比较方法,以日常生活与非日常生活,日常思维与非日常思维的划分为理论前提,建构起日常思维的基本图式,其中日常思维的经验图式或常识图式,日常思维的习俗性图式或礼俗性图式是论文的立根之基,也是日常思维生成机制得以展开的前提和基础。由此,我们分别从历时态和共时态两个层面探寻出日常思维的四条生成途径。主要理论观点是:从历时态来看,原始思维和日常思维之间具有先后相继的直接的内在契合性,虽然原始社会已不复存在,但原始思维并没有因为原始社会的解体而消亡,它的许多规定性经过漫长农业文明仍以特殊的方式沉淀在日常思维中。从共时态来看,经验活动的图式化,日常交往活动的类型化,非日常思维的常识化,分别构成日常思维三条现实的生成途径。论文最后探讨中国的日常思维转型与重建问题,正是以这三条现实的生成途径为切入点展开的。更多还原

【Abstract】 This dissertation mainly studies everyday thinking, which we are familiar with but have no true insight, within the region of everyday life criticism. Taking into account of modernization and culture transformation of Chinese society, it systematically studies the basic scheme and generative mechanism of everyday thinking, reflects on Chinese modernization and transformation of everyday thinking, and tries to construct critique and reconstruction pattern which is suitable for everyday thinking in China to improve modernization of human himself.The dissertation adopts comparison method with classification of everyday life and non-everyday life ,everyday thinking and non-everyday thinking as its theoretical premise. It constructs basic scheme of everyday thinking, among which, experience scheme or common sense scheme, custom scheme or etiquette scheme form the foundation of the thesis, and they are also premise and basis of everyday thinking generative mechanism.Therefore, diachronically and synchronically, we search out four generative ways of everyday thinking.Its main points are: Diachronically, primitive thinking and everyday thinking have successive and direct internal congruence. Though primitive society disappeared, primitive thinking does not die out together with it. Many conventions of primitive thinking remain in everyday thinking in special form after long agricultural civilization. Synchronically, schematization of experiences, typification of everyday communication, and enhancing non-everyday thinking as common sense, are three practical generative ways of everyday thinking. Finally, the dissertation discusses transformation and reconstruction of Chinese everyday thinking with the above mentioned three practical generative ways of everyday thinking as point of penetration.更多还原