【作者】 张振亭；

【导师】 吴廷俊；

【作者基本信息】 华中科技大学 ， 新闻学， 2008， 博士

【摘要】 1978年以来的30年是我国新闻传播研究发展最快、取得成绩最大的30年。对业已做过的研究进行全面、系统地梳理,总结得失,“以史为鉴”,有利于我们对其过去有个清晰的认识,有利于现在的研究者找到新的切入点,有利于新闻传播学未来的发展壮大。本文把学术研究视为一种传播活动,引入“5W”传播模式作为分析架构,既描述学术研究的构成及其发展历程,又揭示它们之间的关系,以及学术研究与其他社会子系统的交互作用,从静态构成和动态变化两个维度述说新时期我国新闻传播学术发展的历史。本文在整体上采取“总—分—总”的体例,通过对历史文献、资料的分析、梳理,探究新闻传播学术总体及各构成要素的变化,即首先概述新时期我国新闻传播学术的发展轨迹,然后分述研究主体、研究内容、研究方法、研究效果四个面向的变化,最后总结取得的主要成就与存在的主要问题。根据新时期新闻传播学术推进的特点,本文把其分为五个阶段:1978-1982:“学术研究逐步恢复”;1983-1988:“新闻改革引发学术论争”;1989-1991:“学术研究曲折前行”;1992-1996:“为学术而学术”;1997-至今:“在新的起点上迈向多元化发展”。研究主体是整个学术生产活动中的第一环节和主导性因素。本文借用知识社会学的有关理论,以群体为线、以个体为点,勾画新闻传播研究主体的变化,探究变化背后的原因,并揭示这种变化对新闻传播学术的影响。为了精细呈现新时期新闻传播研究的整体状况和动态变化,本文对三大学术期刊上的论文进行了抽样内容分析,以寻找各个分支研究领域(新闻理论、新闻史、新闻业务、新闻事业经营管理、广播与电视、传播学、其他)中比较集中的话题、问题,然后结合有关研究成果对此进行评述。在“研究方法论”一章,本文梳理了学界关于新闻传播研究方法的代表性论述,并以部分新闻传播博士论文为例,管窥我国新闻传播研究方法的现状。在此基础上,把一些代表性的研究方法与研究成果结合起来考察,揭示新闻传播研究方法的发展与具体应用。建构学科体系、推进新闻改革是新时期以来我国新闻传播研究效果的主要体现。构建学科理论体系是基础,学科理论体系越完善,越能发挥出学科能量。研究者的论述、新方法的引进、新理论的提出,既为新闻改革提供了合法性阐释,又促进了新闻传播学术的发展。从纵向看,新闻传播研究进展迅速、成绩巨大。经过近30年的发展,新闻传播学摘掉了“无学”的帽子,建起了学术研究梯队,初步完成了知识体系的建构,已经跻身中国人文社会科学之林,拥有了一批有分量的研究成果,学术研究效力得以初步彰显。同时,新闻传播研究不够深入,知识、理论和体系都有待进一步完善。笔者提倡应向学术自身回归,尊重其自身逻辑,扎扎实实地研究些问题,注重积累;要遵守学术规范,讲究研究方法,摈弃过去那种简单化的、直接的、操作性的实用研究。更多还原

【Abstract】 Since 1978, the last 30 years have been a period in which the acedemic of Journalism and Communication (J&C for short) in China has developed the most rapidly and has achieved the greatest successes. A thorough and systematic review of previous research in this field, with a view toward“learning from history”, is conducive to increasing the clarity of our understanding of the history of this field and thereby to finding new perspectives for further study.This thesis examines academic research as a communication activity and, using the“5W”(Who, says What, through Which channel, to Whom, with What effect) communication model as a framework for analysis, aims to describe the structure and history of academic research and the relationship between these two aspects, as well the interaction between academic research and other social systems, and to describe the history of China’s academic research in J&C in terms of two matrices, structure and change, during the new period (from 1978 to the present).Adopting the structure of“general–particular-general”, through the analysis and categorization of historical documents and materials, this thesis explores the changes of the whole and various components of Chinese J&C academic. First, it summarizes the history of academic research in J&C during the new period, and then disaggregates the material by four aspects of change in researchers, research content, method and result. Finally, it concludes the main successes and remaining problems of the J&C research in China.Based on the characteristics of the development of J&C after 1978, this thesis divides the history into 5 periods: first“the gradual reemergence of academic research,”from 1978 to 1982;“academic debates spurred by journalism reform,”1983 to 1988;“uneven development of academic research,”1989 to 1991, and“academic research for the sake of academic research”1992-1996;“development from new stimulus toward diversity”, from 1997-present.The group of researchers is the most important factor of academic activities. With the sociology of knowledge and based on the groups and typical researches, this thesis describes the changes of researcher groups and also analyses the reasons of the change, then reveals how the change impacts research of J&C in China.In order to display the system and changes of academic research in J&C from 1978 to the present specifically, by the method of content analysis, the thesis analyses three main academic journals to categorize topics and problems in each branch of research fields and then evaluates them.In the chapter of“research method”, the thesis categorizes typical opinions of research method in J&C. Meanwhile, it also describes present China’s academic research method in J&C with examples of some doctoral thesis in J&C. Based on the categorization and description of the present research; it reveals the development of research method in J&C and particular usages of that by combining typical research methods and results.The author believes that establishing the subject system and promoting journalism reforms embody research impact in J&C from 1978 to the present. Establishing the subject system is the important foundation. Not only supported journalism reforms, the discussion on the journalism, new research methods, and new theories also promoted the development of academic research in J&C.In the latest 30 years, research in China in J&C has developed the most rapidly and has achieved the greatest successes. Chinese J&C established subject system of academic research gradually and research groups in different generations. In the field of humanities academic researches in China, J&C contributed a variety of great achievements. However, on the other hand, studies in this field are not deep enough. Knowledge, theories, and system need to be improved as well. In the author’s opinion, academic research should be for the sake of academic research to some extent, which means academic research should obey its own logic and standards to get rid of those simple, direct, and practical researches.更多还原