【作者】 孟召宜；

【导师】 苗长虹；

【作者基本信息】 河南大学 ， 区域经济学， 2009， 博士

【摘要】 本研究运用演化经济学、新经济社会学、制度经济学、新经济地理学等多学科理论,采用文献整理与田野调查相结合、定量研究和定性分析相结合、规范研究和实证分析相结合以及比较研究等多种方法,以江苏为实证案例,以文化经济协同演化综合分析框架为理论基础,基于协同演化视角,从内在心智、人际网络、非正式制度三个层面,从企业与集群、县域、区域三个尺度,探讨文化与经济的双向互动关系,揭示文化经济协同演化的机理、过程、效应与表现。研究内容凡8章:第1章主要是明晰论文选题的背景、意义以及研究的思路、内容、方法和主要概念。第2章是文献述评。综观国内外研究,国外文化与经济研究主要从文化内容视角和文化尺度层次两方面展开实证探讨,从经济行为的主观解释、经济行为的规范约束以及信任、社会资本与网络等三方面展开理论论争,而问卷调查、访谈以及细致的阐释是其重要研究方法;国内主要从区域空间角度、文化主体角度、文化内容角度展开实证研究,从正式制度与非正式制度的契合、秩序的形成与扩展、企业家精神、社会资本、文化力、文化资本以及发展模式等角度展开机制探讨。现状研究在取得丰硕成果的同时,仍存在理论视角静态性、理论建构不够系统性、研究过程不够严谨等问题。第3章是文化经济协同演化的理论分析框架。首先在指出新古典经济学不足与演化经济学优势的基础上,明确文化协同演化研究需要基于演化经济学的“非加总”的和“远离均衡”的思维方式。进而,借助“嵌入性”(embeddedness)概念,通过多重嵌入,表达和实现文化的立体影响;通过文化经济相互嵌入,表达和实现文化经济协同演化;通过内外同步嵌入,兼顾文化基因的遗传与变异、内生的文化力量与外在的条件环境。通过整合上述三个维度,形成文化经济协同演化的综合分析框架。进而,通过文化经济协调发展度定量测度文化经济协同演化的状态与过程,通过区域发展模式实现文化经济协同演化的具象与整合,最终形成由协同演化机理-协同演化过程-协同演化形式构成的理论分析框架。第4章是基于企业和集群的文化经济协同演化研究。首先,在明晰研究方法和研究区概况以及官湖文化、经济发展历程与特征的基础上,展开实证研究。研究表明:在企业层面,一方面,传统文化基因使得官湖企业家精神的孕育形成具有内生性,基于血缘、地缘关系形成的社会资本是官湖企业家解决资金、用地问题的重要手段,同时板材企业组织管理也受传统文化影响;另一方面,随着板材企业的发展壮大,企业家价值观不断拓展,企业家能力不断提升。企业家能动进行社会资本的再生产和重构。同时,企业组织管理也在不断创新。区域文化与板材企业的互动形成企业层面的文化经济协同演化;在产业集群层面,官湖企业家精神扩散和变迁过程、集群内板材企业的增生裂变和技术学习方式、板材集群治理无不依赖于血缘、地缘等传统关系网络、无不渗透着浓浓的乡情。同时,随着板材集群的发展壮大,集群经济也能动促进官湖区域文化创新。区域文化与集群经济的互动形成集群层面的文化经济协同演化。最后,从文化经济协同演化视角审视官湖社会变迁,发现官湖文化经济协调发展阶段循序提高;发展阶段提升较快,演化进程迅速;文化经济互动明显,文化经济耦合力迅速形成。官湖模式的活力在于官湖文化经济的高效、快速协同演化格局的形成与深化。第5章是县域文化经济协同演化研究。县域文化是重要的文化小区。问卷调查表明,江苏县域新型文化发育水平偏低,同质性较强,文化类型分布随机,在沿海、沿江、沿东陇海分别以盐城、昆山、宿迁为中心形成三个高值区,具有市区高县乡低的城乡二元特征。文化与经济相关分析表明,整体上文化与经济发展、经济增长均未表现出相关性。按人均GDP分组相关分析,高值组表现出负相关,低值组表现出低度正相关。江苏县市信任空间格局具有类型数量分布中间高两头低,高分值类型主要分布在苏中、苏北地区,各种类型相间分布,南通、盐城及周边区域形成高值区等特征。关系网络资本形成南高北低的空间格局。相关分析表明,信任与经济增长、经济发展无相关性,而关系网络与经济增长、经济发展表现出弱负相关。文化观念替代指标和社会资本替代指标相关分析表明,价值观念、社会资本与经济增长、经济发展的相关性均有人幅度提升。最后,在定性和定量分析丰县模式、昆山模式的基础上,从文化经济协同演化视角比较了丰县模式与昆山模式。第6章是区域文化经济协同演化研究。在明晰区域文化经济协同演化研究的重要意义基础上,首先把江苏分为楚汉文化区、吴文化区、江淮文化区三大文化区和徐州文化亚区、赣榆文化亚区、苏州文化亚区、常州文化亚区、金陵文化亚区、淮扬文化亚区、海盐文化亚区七个亚区。进而,运用基尼系数和泰尔指数分析文化区、文化亚区之间经济差异的格局与演化过程,研究表明:①总体经济差异在波动中缓慢上升,但未超出警戒线;②从文化区二层次看,区间贡献率在波动中上升,区内贡献率在波动中缓慢下降,区间贡献逐渐成为差异的主要组成部分;③文化区内贡献依次为江淮文化区、吴文化区、楚汉文化区;④从文化亚区层次看,文化亚区区内差异是文化区内差异的主要贡献者;⑤从过程上看,一阶分解、二阶分解波动变化具有阶段上的一致性。文化区、文化亚区间经济差异的形成与江苏文化传统南北迥异有关。从三大文化区层面看,吴文化地区,以开放和实用为精神内核的吴文化,能动孕育、选择和创新“苏南模式”,形成苏南经济率先发展的能动力量和文化底蕴。苏北文化以传统的农耕文化为主,具有封闭性、保守性,滞重的传统文化使苏北现代化进程相对缓慢。第7章是促进文化经济协同演化的对策措施。从微观层面看,动员地方资源、激发和保持企业家精神等是促进企业和集群发展的文化对策。从中观、宏观层面看,强化文化规划、重视文化载体建设、加快文化体制改革、注重文化传承创新、重视文化交流融合、强化正式制度建设、形成良性路径依赖为促进文化经济协调发展的主要措施。第8章是结论与创新。主要结论为:①基于协同演化视角研究文化与经济有着重要的理论意义;②文化以“文化场”的形式立体影响经济增长;③“资本”的相互转换与循环互动是文化经济协同演化的微观基础与实质所在;④文化经济协调发展度及其动态变化体现了文化经济协同演化的状态与过程;⑤区域发展模式是文化经济协同演化的结果;⑥文化经济协同演化类型多样。主要创新为:①初步提出基于协同演化的文化与经济研究视角和研究思路;②提出并初步构建了文化经济协同演化研究的理论分析框架;③从多个层面深度探讨文化经济协同演化的机理及过程特征;④深化了文化差异的定量测度和空间表现方法。更多还原

【Abstract】 In this paper,multi-disciplinary theories,such as evolutionary economics,the new economic sociology,institutional economics,new economic geography and so on are used,and multiple methods,including a combination of literature and the field investigation,quantitative research and qualitative analysis,normative study and empirical analysis,comparative study and so on are adopted,then Jiang-su Province is selected as an empirical case,a comprehensive analytical framework of the cultural-economic coevolution is formed as theoretical base,furthermore from perspective of coevolution and based on three aspects of internal thinker,network of people, informal institutions,relations about interaction between culture and economy is studied,mechanism, process,effect and performance of cultural-economic coevolution is explored form three scales such as enterprise and cluster,county,region.The study mainly includes 8 chapters:Chapter 1:The main purpose of the chapter is to definitize the background and the significance of the subjects as well as the research ideas,contents,methods and key concepts of the paper.Chapter 2:Literature Review.Focusing on the domestic and foreign research,foreign research on the culture and economic is mainly discussed empirically perspective from the two aspects of the cultural content perspective and culture scale levels and is debated on the theory from the subjective interpretation of economic behavior,economic behavior constraint,trust,social capital and network; The dominant research methods of the study are questionnaires,interviews and detailed explanations. In comparison,domestic empirical research is explored mainly from the perspective of regional special scale,cultural subject,cultural content and it is discussed from the fit between the formal institutions and informal institutions,the formation and expansion of the order,entrepreneurship, social capital,cultural power,and cultural capital as well as the development models and so on. Besides the fruitful achievements of the present research,there are some problems,such as the static theory perspective,the lack of systematic theory building,the preciseness of the study and so on.Chapter 3:The main purpose of this chapter is to build the analytical framework of the cultural-economic coevolution theory.Firstly,on the basis of pointing out the deficiency of the new classical economics and the advantage of the evolutionary economics,it is specific that cultural coevolution research needs the thinking mode which is based on the thinking mode of evolutionary economics which does not only add the individual to get total and far away from the balance.Further, by using of the embeddedness concept,the three-dimensional influence of the culture is expressed and realized through multiple embedding;the cultural and economic coevolution is expressed and realized through culture and economy which embed in each other;the heredity and variation of the culture gene,the endogenous cultural forces and the external environment conditions is all considered in virtue of internal and external synchronization embedding each other.A comprehensive analytical framework of the cultural-economic coevolution is formed by integrating three dimensions discussed above.Furthermore,the cultural-economic coevolution is quantitative measured and described through the degrees of the cultural and economic coordinated development, the concrete image of the cultural-economic coevolution is achieved through the regional development model.Finally,the theoretical analysis framework including the mechanism process form is constructed.Chapter 4:The study on cultural-economic coevolution based on enterprise and cluster.On the basis of perspicuity of research methods and area condition,the characteristics of Guanhu culture and its economic based on plywood,empirically perspective is done.The research indicates:on the level of enterprise,for one thing,traditional culture gene makes Guanhu’s entrepreneurship have a endogenous characteristic.The social capital based on blood and regional relationship is an important way for Guanhu’s entrepreneurs to solve the problems of fund and land.At the same time,the organization and management of plywood enterprise is influenced by the traditional culture. For another,With the growth of plywood enterprises,entrepreneurs develop their values and enhance their abilities ceaselessly and they are voluntary to carry out the reproduction and reconstruction of the social capital.At the same time,enterprise organization and management innovate continually. The interaction between the regional culture and plywood enterprise form the cultural-economic co-evolution on the level of enterprise.on the level of cluster,the diffusion and change process of the plywood entrepreneurship of Guanhu,the hyperplasia and fission about enterprise,mode and channels on technical learning of the enterprise within clusters and management about cluster are all dependent on the traditional relationship networks such as the blood and regional networks and they are also permeated with deep homesickness.At the same time,with the development of clusters, cluster economy can promote regional cultural innovation.The interaction between regional culture and cluster economy form the cultural-economic coevolution on the level of cluster.At last,the social change of Guanhu is examined from the perspective of cultural-economic coevolution, research shows that the stage about economic and cultural coordination development of Guanhu is sequential to improve,the evolution process enhance quickly,the process of the evolution is rapid, interaction of cultural and economic is remarkable and the coupling forces of cultural and economic form rapidly.The vitality of Guanhu’s model is the efficient and rapid formation and deepenness of coevolution pattern of culture-economy.Chapter 5:The study on cultural-economic coevolution of county area.County culture is an important cultural region.As the questionnaire shows,the development level of the new culture of the county in Jiangsu is low,highly homogeneous,and cultural types distribute stochastically.Along the coast,the Yangtse Rive,the east Longhai railroad,three high-value areas are formed by Yancheng,Kunshan,Suqian respectively as the centers and urban-rural dual characteristic is come into being as urban districts high and rural area low.The cultural and economic correlation analysis shows that the correlation between the culture and economic development,economic growth is not clear on the whole.Then another correlation analysis is carried out based on two groups divided by per GDP.Results show a low positive correlation between the culture and economic of low-value group,and a negative correlation for high-value group.The spatial pattern of trust among cities and counties of Jiangsu has the following characteristics:the distribution of the type and number is high in the middle and low at both ends;high-value types are mainly distributed in the middle and the North of Jiangsu;all kinds of types distribute alternatively;Nantong,Yancheng and their surrounding areas form the high-value areas and so on.The relation network capital form a spatial pattern which is high in the south while low in the north.Correlation analysis shows that there is no correlation between the trust with economic growth and economic development,while the relationship between the network with economic growth and economic development shows a weak legative correlation.The correlation analysis between economic with the alternative indicators of cultural values and social capital shows that the correlation between the values and social capital with economic growth and economic development has greatly enhanced.At last,on the basis of Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the Feng county model and the Kunshan county model,they are compared with each other from the perspective of cultural-economic coevolution.Chapter 6:Study on cultural-economic coevolution of region.Based on clarifying the important significance of the study on the regional cultural and cultural-economic coevolution,first of all,Jiangsu can be divided into three major culture regions which are Chu-Han,Wu and Jinanghuai and seven sub-cultural district which are Xuzhou,Ganyu,Changzhou,Jinling,huaiyang, Haiyan.Furthermore,the patterns and evolution process of the economic difference between the cultural and sub-cultural region are analyzed by using of the Geordie coefficient and the Theil index. The study shows①The overall economic difference rises slowly in fluctuations,but it is not beyond the warning line;②From the culture region level,it can be seen that interval contribution rate increases in fluctuations,while the inner region contribution rate decreases slowly in fluctuations,and interval contribution gradually become the main part of the difference;③The inner contribution of the cultural region can be arranged by Jianghuai Cultural region,Wu cultural region and Chu-Han culture region;④From the level of the sub-cultural district,the inner difference of he sub-cultural region is the main contributor to the cultural region;⑤From the point view of process,the volatile changes of the first-order is in the consistency with second-order decomposition in the phase.The formation of the economic difference between the cultural region and sub-cultural district is related with the difference of the cultural traditions of Jiangsu between the South and the North.From the level of the three major cultural districts,it can be found that with the core spirit of open mind and practicallity,Wu culture can breed,select and innovate the "Sunan model" and form the dynamic power and cultural connotation of the first development of the economy of southern Jiangsu.The culture of the north of Jiangsu is based on the traditional farming culture,which has the closed,conservative characteristic,lagged traditional culture leads the slow modernization process of the north in Jiangsu.Chapter 7:Countermeasures to promote coevolution of culture-economy.From the micro level,the culture countermeasures to promote the enterprise and cluster development is to mobilize local resources,stimulate and sustain entrepreneurship,and so on.From the medium and macro level, the main countermeasures to promote the coordinated development of the culture and economy are as follows:Strengthen the culture planning,pay attention to cultural vector construction,speed up the cultural system reform,place emphasis on cultural heritage innovation,think much of cultural integration,strengthen the building of a formal system and form a benign path dependence.Chapter 8:Conclusions and Innovations.The main conclusions are as follows:①Study on the culture and economy has important theoretical significance based on the perspective of coevolution.②Culture impact on the economic growth in the form of "cultural field" with three-dimension.③The micro-foundation and essence of the cultural-economic coevolution is the mutual conversion and cycle interaction of the capitals including cultural capital,social capital and economic capital;④The coordinated development degree and its change indicate the state and the process of culture-economy coevolution;⑤The Regional development pattern is the result of culture-economy coevolution.⑥There are many types of culture-economy coevolution,but "Sides of the same coin." The innovation is as follows:①The culture and economic research perspective and research ideas of the co-evolution have been proposed tentatively.②A theoretical analysis framework of the culture-economy coevolution has been indicated and constructed preliminarily.③The characteristics of culture-economy coevolution have been explored deeply from multiple levels;④The quantitative measurement and the spatial performance methods of the cultural differences have been deepened.更多还原