【作者】 刘九伟；

【导师】 王立群；

【作者基本信息】 河南大学 ， 中国古典文献学， 2009， 博士

【摘要】 本文以南宋初期明州州学刊刻的六家本《文选》为研究对象。明州本《文选》在其初刻之后,终宋一朝,至少经历了五次修补。此书为现存最早的完整的六家注本。在《文选》版本史上具有重要的地位。论文正文部分共分五章。第一章探讨《文选》版本的研究现状,包括两个问题:一是有关《文选》版本的相继发现与出版,二是明州本《文选》研究的现状及不足,意欲将明州本《文选》置于整个《文选》版本的背景中进行研究,并将其凸显。第二章描述明州本的成书,共分两节:第一节是明州本《文选》的递藏情况。此部分主要结合目录学著作与历史文献记载,对明州本的刊刻与递藏情况进行考证,尽量理清明州本《文选》的初刻、递修与递藏情况。第二节是明州本《文选》刊刻情况,从刻工与避讳两个方面进行考证。第三章探讨明州本的来源,共分三节,包括两方面的内容。一是考察明州本是否直接来自单注本,通过明州本与国子监李善注等进行比较说明此问题,二是考察明州本是否来自合注本,是哪种合注本,通过与秀州本、广都本进行比较来说明。通过比较,理清明州本的版本来源。第四章是明州本的特征。通过与他本的比较,从而弄清明州本本身的特征。第一是五臣减注情况的排比,第二是李善注的改编情况:一是增注的情况,二是其它卷的减注现象。另外是一些校语的变化以及异文等的变化。第五章是明州本的影响。此章主要考察明州本的“去脉”问题。以明州本与赣州本、尤刻本、陈八郎本等进行比较,理清其对后世刻本的影响。明州本对赣州本的影响。明州本之后就开始了《文选》注本上的六臣注时代,六臣注本的第一刻是赣州本。这是合注本较为严重的变化,可以说二家注都失去了原貌。李善注进一步加强,五臣注进一步减弱。赣州本虽然有了很大的变化,但也体现出了明显的承明州本而来的特征。第二节是明州本与尤刻本之间的关系。赣州本承明州本而来,尤刻本与赣州本关系密切。最后是结语,指出明州本在选学史的地位和在版本学上的价值定位。更多还原

【Abstract】 The article topic is the research for "the selected anthology"(six-persons comment version) which was printed by Ming Zhou institute at the early Southern Song Dynasty.During Southern Song Dynasty,it was updated at least five times.It is the earliest and the most intact version of "the selected anthology"(six-persons comment version) and very important position in "the selected anthology" editions.The article included five chapters.ChapterⅠ:The current research of "the selected anthology" editions.Because more "the selected anthology" editions were published and less research for the Ming Zhou version of "the selected anthology",this article focuses on it.ChapterⅡ:Describes the history of the Ming Zhou version of "the selected anthology".SectionⅠ:Preserve in turn situation.Combine the related catalog works and the history literature;attest the published situation and preserve in tum of the Ming Zhou version of "the selected anthology",coordinate the first version and updated in turn and preserve in turn situation for the Ming Zhou version of "the selected anthology";SectionⅡPublished and engraved situation.Research from engrave skill and taboo.ChapterⅢ:The resource of the Ming Zhou version of "the selected anthology".Divided to three sections and two contents:ContentⅡ:It is come from "one person comments version" or not?By comparison with Ming zhou version and Li Shan version,to point out this question;ContentⅡ:It is come from "more person comments version" or not?By comparison with Ming Zhou version and Xiu Zhou version and Guang Du version,to confirm the source of the Ming Zhou version of"the selected anthology"ChapterⅣCharacteristic of the Ming zhou version of "the selected anthology".By comparison with other versions,clarify the characteristic of this Ming zhou version of "the selected anthology".SectionⅠ:Compare with the five-liegeman comment version reduced in turn.SectionⅡ:Compare with Li-Shan Comment version changes situation.Li -Shan version’s additional comments;Other versions reduction comments;Others:Proof words and aberrant words etc.changes.ChapterⅤThe impact of the Ming zhou version of "the selected anthology".By comparison with Gan Zhou version,You-Ke version and Chen-balang version,to clear up the impact of the Ming-Zhou to late generation.Ⅰ) To Gan Zhou version,after the Ming zhou version,is the age for the six-liegeman Comment version,its first published version is Gan-Zhou version.This is the big change for the combine comments versions,these two versions become the new look.Li-Shan version strengthen, the five-liegeman comment version weaken.Gan-Zhou version has more changes,however,still come from the Ming zhou versionⅡ) To You-Ka version,Gan-Zhou version come from the Ming zhou version,You-Ka version have more relationship with Gan-Zhou version.The final conclusion,point out the Ming-Zhou version position in "the selected anthology" and publish history.更多还原