【作者】 彭惠青；

【导师】 郑杭生；

【作者基本信息】 华中师范大学 ， 社会学， 2009， 博士

【摘要】 城市社区建设中的居民参与是我国社区建设中受到高度关注的问题,学者从不同角度对其进行了广泛的研究,提出了许多真知灼见,但也存在对社区参与的主体及相关研究不够,实证研究明显不足等问题。本文在已有研究的基础上,对居民参与的历程进行了勾勒,特别对本世纪以来的居民参与的行动进程进行了考察和分析,提出了社区参与主体多元化,理性的行动加强了社区参与主体互信与合作的趋势,通过对“熟人社区”和“陌生人社区”居民进行的个案访谈,了解行动—信任—合作的内在机理,为多方合作和社区社会资本的培育提供借鉴,对提升居民参与的能力提出对策和建议,为构建和谐社区、和谐社会尽自己一点绵薄之力。论文共分为五章。第一章:导论。介绍选题的背景和意义;基本概念的界定;城市社区建设中居民参与的研究现状与综述;研究的分析框架和研究方法。第二章:城市社区建设中居民参与的历程与现状。简要叙述在单位制、街居制主导下的居民参与的路径、内容与特点;主要探讨在社区制主导下,随着体制改革与社会结构分化,社区建设的发展,以武汉市的社区建设中居民参与的实践为例,说明本世纪以来,政府在社区发展战略和策略上的变化,以及由此产生的不同结果;出现了社区参与主体多元化,价值理性的行动加强了社区参与主体互信与合作的趋势,社区建设出现了良好的开端。对城市社区建设中居民参与存在的问题进行梳理,并进行影响因素分析。第三章:武汉市社区居民参与的实地考察。分别选择B社区(新型房地产开发型社区)和G社区(传统式街坊社区)作为“熟人社区”和“陌生人社区”的代表,通过个案访谈的形式,研究政府与居民之间、居委会与居民之间,行动—信任—合作形成的内在机理,分析由行动产生信任的影响因子,对两种不同类型社区居民参与的共性和差异性进行了分析,提出社区社会资本培育的共性与差异性。第四章:城市社区建设中多元参与主体与社区社会资本培育。提出各参与主体在社区社会资本培育中的路径和内容,提出政府、企业和社区自治组织在加强与居民之间的信任与合作、培育社区社会资本方面,可以采取的一些具体的行动计划。第五章:城市社区建设中居民参与的培育。在社区社会资本逐渐增长的基础上,从制度创新和能力建设两方面加强居民参与的培育,走有中国特色的社区建设之路。更多还原

【Abstract】 Residents’ participation in the urban community construction is a focus question in the construction of community,which is widely discussed from different aspects and a lot of valuable achievements have been attained.However,there’re some weaknesses in the research,for example, the subject of community-based participation is lack of research,and the empirical research is not enough,etc.This thesis describes the process of residents’ participation,especially makes empirical research on the action process of residents’ participation ever since this century.The author points out the multiplication of subjects of participation and that rational action strengthens the mutual trust and cooperation in-between different subjects.Through interviews in acquaintance-based community and stranger-based community,the interior mechanism of action-trust-cooperation is understood,which offers some experience for multilateral cooperation and social capital.The solutions and proposals are brought forward to promote the participation ability of residents.This thesis falls into five parts:PartⅠis introduction,which introduces the background and significance of this research,defines relative concepts,evaluates relative documents on urban community construction,and represents the frame of study and methods of research.PartⅡis about the process and current situation of residents’ participation of urban community construction.It mainly discusses the following aspects:the route,content and characteristics of residents’ participation under unit-system and street-system;under the community-system,with the reform of social system and the differentiation of social structure,the development of community construction,taking the practice of residents’ participation in Wuhan as an example,illustrating the change of government’s community development strategy and tactics and the consequence resulted from them;the participating subjects multiplies and rationality the mutual trust and cooperation in-between different subjects is reinforced.And finally discusses the problems in the residents’ participation of urban community construction and its causal elements.PartⅢis about the investigation of residents’ participation of Wuhan City.Community B,a modern real estate community,and Community G,a traditional street community,stand for "acquaintance community" and "stranger community" respectively.Through interviews in acquaintance-based community and stranger-based community,the interior mechanism of action-trust-cooperation between residents and government is understood,analyzes the causal elements,sorts out the common features and differences in the cultivation of social capital within communities.PartⅣis about multiple subjects in community construction and the cultivation of social capital of community.The author points out that government,enterprises and construction organizations of community can take some concrete actions to strengthen trust and cooperation between residents and them.PartⅤis about the cultivation of residents’ participation in the urban community construction. The author points out that it is necessary to create community construction with Chinese characteristics in the field of institutions innovation and capability building while social capital of community is growing.更多还原