【作者】 卜炜玮；

【导师】 朱宏亮；

【作者基本信息】 清华大学 ， 管理科学与工程， 2008， 博士

【摘要】 在我国目前的土地制度下,财产征收包括农村土地征收和城市房屋拆迁两个部分。我国现有的财产征收制度存在较多缺陷,相关理论研究也有不足。本文以美国、日本和德国的财产征收制度作为比较研究的对象,从目的、补偿、程序三个方面对财产征收的理论问题进行了研究:1)从美国和日本的法律对财产征收的目的制约中,提炼出对征收项目进行分类的三项标准和判断公共目的的两条准则;2)对美国和德国法律对管制征收的判定准则进行了研究;3)对Michelman的多因素功利主义模型进行扩展,将负道德成本进一步细分为不公平成本、无效率成本、社会紧张成本。用扩展后的模型对政府的征收决策进行成本收益分析,探讨社会最优的补偿原则;4)对征收涉及的财产价值进行分类,利用此分析框架对各国现有补偿标准和计算方法进行研究,总结社会最优的征收补偿标准;5)研究日美两国的征收程序与法律救济途径,总结出良好的征收程序应当具备的要素。以上述研究成果为参照,从征收目的制约、管制征收判定、实体征收的补偿原则和标准、征收程序设置等方面对我国现行财产征收制度进行了分析,对影响政府征收决策的相关制度及正在进行中的改革进行了研究,并提出了进一步的改革建议:1)制定统一征收法,对两类征收行为统一进行规范。2)统一对不同对象的征收目的制约,按照本文提出的两条规则判定“公共目的”。3)以“一个理论,两条规则,三项因素”作为管制征收的判定标准。4)重新制定补偿标准,采用公平补偿原则,以公平市场价格为基础,对被征收财产的全部客观价值和部分主观价值进行补偿。5)将协议价购作为申请征收的必要前置程序,增加征收目的检验程序,改革征收范围和征收补偿检验程序,保障被征收者的知情权和参与权,为被征收者提供充足而廉价的司法救济途径。6)按照“同地、同权、同价”的原则,允许集体建设用地使用权在符合规划限制的条件下自由转让。7)改革财政制度、官员选拔任用制度和司法制度,减少地方政府从征收中得到的收入,将任职地民众对官员的评价作为主要的考核指标,增强司法机构在征收案件审判中的独立性。更多还原

【Abstract】 Under the current land system, there are two kinds of condemnation in China: condemnation of the rural collective ownership and condemnation of the right to use urban land. Both of them have many defects.Taking the condemnation systems in America, Japan and Germany as objects of comparative study, some theoretical questions were researched in terms of purpose, compensation and procedure: 1) Three criteria to classify projects and two rules to judge public purpose are abstracted from the purpose limitation in condemnation law in America and Japan; 2) The rules to judge regulatory takings in America and Germany are analyzed; 3) Expand the multifactor utilitarian economic analyzing framework presented by Frank Michelman, decompose the demoralization costs to three items: injustice cost, inefficiency cost and social tension cost, then use the expanded framework to analyze the taking decision of government and optimum principles of compensation; 4) Compensation standards in foreign countries are analyzed in terms of classification of the values and costs involved in takings, the social optimum compensation standard is put forward. 5) The procedures of condemnation and approaches to judicial relief in America and Japan are discussed; some necessary factors for an excellent procedure are summed up.The current condemnation system in China is researched on the basis of the theoretical results. Other systems affecting the decision of government and the proceeding reform are also analyzed. Reform in the future should focus on the following points: 1) Make uniform condemnation law; 2) Use the two rules put forward by this dissertation to judge whether a project has a public purpose; 3) Use“one theory, two rules, three factors”to judge regulatory takings; 4) Adjust the compensation standard, take just compensation principle and compensate all the object values and part of subject values of the condemnee. 5) Set purchase by agreement as preceding procedure of condemnation. Add purpose check procedure and reform area, compensation check procedure. Ensure condemnee’s right to know and right to participate. Give them enough and cheap approach to get judicial relief. 6) Open primary land market and treat two kinds of land ownership equally. Allow the transfer of the right to use collective land for construction which accord with planning. 7) Reduce the revenue of local government from the actions of condemnation. Take opinions from local people as a major examination index for officials. Enhance the independence of courts that deal with condemnation cases.更多还原