节点文献

鲁中地区近代历史建筑修复与再利用研究

The Research of Restoration and Reuse of Neoteric Architectural Heritages in Luzhong Area

【作者】 辛同升

【导师】 杨昌鸣;

【作者基本信息】 天津大学 , 建筑历史与理论, 2008, 博士

【摘要】 1840年以后,随着西方文化的强势锲入,鲁中地区城市出现了大量完全西式或者中西合璧式的近代建筑。这些建筑对于城市的总体格局和风貌有着至关重要的影响,也是延续城市文脉、增强城市竞争力的重要载体。上世纪80年代以来,随着城市化进程的快速推进,城市建设如火如荼,许多具有上百年历史的近代历史建筑面临着巨大的生存压力与挑战。近年来,随着科学发展观的贯彻落实,各地相继开展了若干近代建筑的修复利用工作。然而,由于相关理论的匮乏以及成功案例的缺失,建设性破坏现象时有发生。通过对鲁中地区近代历史建筑的多次调研,本文针对性的分析了近代历史建筑面临的矛盾与危机,同时,以大量正方两方面的经验教训为依据,剖析了鲁中近代历史建筑修复利用中存在的问题。对于近代建筑不能单纯的保存,而是要创造性再利用,本文结合鲁中地区经济、文化、地理环境等状况,提出了“延续·更新”的修复利用策略。群体历史建筑对于城市格局、城市交通、城市景观等均具有重要影响。本文针对群体历史建筑提出了“整合·再生”的有机改造构想,即通过整体性的改善历史建筑群的环境状况,优化规划布局,提升建筑品质等措施,给历史建筑群注入新的活力,最终实现历史建筑群的“再生”。本文结合实例,详尽阐述了群体历史建筑的若干修复利用模式。近代历史建筑群修复利用采用何种模式除了依据本体特点外,还必须综合考虑经济、文化、环境、交通等多种因素。单体历史建筑的修复利用更加注重相对微观的环节。所谓“重构—再生”的修复利用策略,即综合分析历史建筑的本体价值、使用功能、周围环境等相关因素,通过确定其修复利用的具体途径、选择合适的修复技术等措施,最终实现历史建筑的再利用。历史建筑的修复改建途径包括两个方面:建筑空间的改建利用、立面造型的修复与协调。本文较为详尽的阐述了近代历史建筑主要的修复技术,修复技术策略的选择应根据近代历史建筑存在的客观条件和保护的价值标准。借鉴建筑后评估的方法,本文结合丰大楼平移保护、山大号院修复改建两个案例,对于修复技术策略的合理性及适用性进行了评估,目的是总结正、反两方面的经验和教训,为相近状况的近代历史建筑的整治利用提供借鉴。

【Abstract】 After 1840, with the penetration of Western culture, a large number of modern architectures, completely western style or Chinese-and-Western style, appeared across the urban of Luzhong Area. These constructions were essential to the layout and appearance of the urban, also being the major bearers for the development of local culture and the reinforcement of city competence. Since the 1980s, along with a rapid urbanization, urban construction processed in full swing, and thus many modern buildings with 100-year history had to deal with huge pressure and great challenges for survival. Recently, along with the implementation of the Scientific Outlook on Development, a number of restoration work on modern architectures had been carried out around this area. However, due to the lack of relevant theories and the absence of successful cases, constructive damages occurred from time to time.Through several fieldworks on the historical modern architectures in Luzhong Area, this paper analyses the contradictions and crisis facing the historical architectures on target. At the same time, based on massive experience from both positive and negative sides, the paper analyses the problems existing in the restoration and reuse of the historical modern architectures in Luzhong Area. Modern architecture shall not just be preserved simply, but reused creatively. Giving thoughts to the factors such as economy, culture, geography in Luzhong Area, this paper proposes with some basic principles to the restoration and reuse of historical modern architectures.Historical modern architectures have great influence to the urban’s layout, transportation and landscape. In this paper, an organic concept of“integration·regeneration”is put forward, which is meant to input new energy into historical modern architectures and realize the regeneration by means of the improvement of the whole environment, the optimization of plan and layout, and the enhancement of architectural quality. In addition, several restoration-and-reuse patterns of historical architecture groups are elaborated with examples. Which pattern should be chosen depend on not only noumenal characteristics, but also economy, culture, environment, traffic and other factors.The restoration of a single historical building emphasizes more on relatively micro levels. The so-called“integration·regeneration”concept considers the integration of the architecture’s noumenal characteristics, functions, surrounding environment and other relevant factors, determines specific ways and suitable techniques to restore, and realizes the reuse of historical architectures eventually. The methods to the restoration of historical buildings are related to two aspects: the re-use of space and the repair of facades. The major repair techniques are described in detail. The tactics of repair techniques should be based on the objective conditions and protective value standards. Using the after-building evaluation for reference, and combined with the cases of Fengda Mansion’s removal and Shandahao courtyard’s restoration, this paper evaluated the adaptability and feasibility of restoration tactics, in the goal of summarizing the experience of both the positive and negative sides, in order to offer reference to the similar historical architectures.

  • 【网络出版投稿人】 天津大学
  • 【网络出版年期】2009年 07期
  • 【分类号】TU984.114
  • 【被引频次】31
  • 【下载频次】1258
  • 攻读期成果
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络