中国现代学术性自传研究

【作者】 郭小英；

【导师】 朱文华；

【作者基本信息】 复旦大学 ， 中国现当代文学， 2008， 博士

【摘要】 学术性自传是学者对其学术心路历程的一种自我表达,广义上它应属于自传的一种。我国西汉时期就出现了以序跋为主的学术性自传雏形,发展至现代与当代,学术性自传已经成为一种独立的传记形式。学术性自传不是学术与自传的简单相加。前者是一种学术职业身份,而后者指个人生活与个性历史。这两者在“个人史”中交错延展,外人一般很难厘清二者的关系,通过学术性自传研究可以为学者个案研究、学术史研究、他传的写作提供一些可供参考的结论。这正是本文提出学术性自传概念的理论设想。提出学术性自传概念后,本人把研究对象框定在现代,为探索与论述的方便,本论文重点考察的学术性自传的传主为学术成熟期在1912-1949年的中国人文学者,无论解放后他们在国内还是在海外。传记学本身是跨文学与史学的领域,学术性自传更是跨越多个学科。随着传记观念的演进,自传已经成为一种普遍的自我书写方式,学术性自传也成为一种比较显著的社会文化现象,但研究这一现象的论文与著作很少。研究这种传记文化现象,涉及的问题很多,如传记的属性、学者的使命、知识分子的状况、叙事理论、自我意识与自我认识、中国的自传与西方自传的差异。作者在通读文献、细读文本的基础上,引入自传观念,对中国现代自传观念进行了梳理,将现代学者得学术性自传置于自传观念演进过程中进行综合考察,探讨了现代学术性自传产生的社会历史根源与心理根源,对现代学术性自传的传记要素进行了归纳与梳理,对现代学术性自传的文体特点进行分析与判断,对现代学术自传的个案进行分析。在现代学术性自传中的学术史料予以整合,发掘出现代学术发展过程中的学人心态、学术生存、学科观念轨迹,为现代学术史研究提供参考。论文包括六个部分。引论部分提出研究对象。第一章主要通过探讨中国现代自传观念的演进过程,对现代有代表性的自传观念进行纵向梳理,从而将学术性自传置于中国自传文化史进行考察。学术性自传既是自传观念演进的结果,也是自传研究的新领域。作为自传领域的一个子类,学术性自传的特点、本质、分析框架与其它自传有相同或类似之处。本章是学术性自传研究的理论基础。第二章重点分析学术性自传的传记文化要素,揭示现代学术性自传的社会文化根源以及心理根源,对现代学术性自传中的童年叙事、教育经历、师承渊源、学思历程等传记要素逐一梳理与分析,对学术性自传的文学性以及特点进行分析与归纳。第三章侧重学术性自传的个案分析,以鲁迅、胡适、顾颉刚三位学者为代表,论述学者如何在学术性自传中塑造学术性自我,学者在塑造学术性自我中政治文化因素对写作者的影响,以及学术性自传与学术活动直接相关的生活叙事。第四章重点发掘现代学术性自传中反映出的学人心态、学术现状、学术生存、学科观念的轨迹,并分析其相关要素在中国现代学术史上的作用与意义。结语部分对现代学术性自传写作的缺陷进行归纳总结。对当代学术性自传的前景进行分析与预测。更多还原

【Abstract】 That it should belong to autobiography one that academic autobiography is a scholar to whose learning intention one kind ego is expressed, broad wide upper species. Our country Western Han Dynasty period moved towards the academic nature autobiography having appeared to give first place to the preface and postscript embryonic form, develop extremely modern times and the present age, academic nature autobiography already becomes one kind of independent biography form. Academic nature autobiography is not that learning and the autobiography simplicity add together. The former is one kind of occupation dignity, the latter points to but individual livelihood and individuality history. This both criss cross in "individual history " to extend, relation very difficult to clean up first, secondly, probably can be that case study, learning history study, the writing that he biography waits the conclusion providing a few but confession reference for a while like the outsider by the fact that academic nature autobiography studies. This exactly is the main body of a book suggesting that academic nature autobiography is conceptual theory tentative plan. Submit academic nature autobiography concept Queen, I am in the object of study frame surely modern, for going to the lavatory probing and commenting that, the academic nature autobiography biography host that thesis priority inspects is that the learning maturation period is from1912 to 1949 of Chinese humanity scholar, without concening they are in the homeland or overseas after liberation.That biography learns self is a field across literature and the science of history, academic nature autobiography is more stride over many discipline. To write academic nature autobiography is one kind of comparatively notable society culture phenomenon, but the thesis studying about this phenomenons and writes is very few. This Question is many relating that studying this biography culture, if the biography attribute, scholar’s mission, intellectual’s status, narrate theory, autopsyche and oneself cognition , Chinese autobiography and west autobiography difference. The thesis is confronted with from data to logic structure all in the originally unexpected difficulty, the author who thinks of everything can, before read through a document, careful read the society historical roots having discussed modern academic nature autobiography on the version basis coming into being and psychological origin, the key element carries out induction on modern academic nature autobiography biography and comb, the characteristic carries out analysis and the judgement on modern academic nature autobiography style of writing, the autobiography case carries out analysis on modern learning, historical material integrates, to provide the modern learning history reference to learning in academic nature autobiography.The thesis includes six parts. The introduction part brings forward an object of study.The first chapter mainly passes concept evolution discussing Chinese autobiography, the evolution result, places academic nature autobiography in the concept explaining that academic nature autobiography is Chinese autobiography thereby Chinese autobiography history of culture carries out examination. Academic nature autobiography now that autobiography concept the evolution result, the frontier being also that autobiography studies . One build of field resembles as autobiography, academic nature autobiography characteristic, nature, analytical framework and other autobiography have place of identical or being similar with. Seal is academic nature autobiography practice and rationale.The second chapter analyses academic nature autobiography biography culture function key element, to modern academic nature autobiography society culture origin and mentality origin, one by one, carding and the literature analysing, to academic nature autobiography analyse and sum up childhood biography key elements such as experience, the succession of teachings from a master to his disciples origin, learning thought course narrating, educating in modern academic nature autobiography as well as the characteristic is in progressThe third chapter puts particular emphasis on academic nature autobiography analyses, and take Lu Xun, Hu Shi, Gu Jie Gang three’s place scholar as representative, and discuss a scholar how to mold academic nature ego in academic nature autobiography, scholar effect writing an author face to face in the factor molding academic nature ego middle politics culture, and academic nature autobiography and academic activity direct relevance life narrate.The forth chapter concentrates on combing effect and significance that whose relevance key element mounts with reporting, and analysis discussing modern academic nature autobiography to modern scholar psychology, learning current situation, learning survival, learning target etc. in modern Chinese learning history..The part of concluding is carried out on modern academic nature autobiography defect sums up. The autobiography prospect carries out analysis and the forecast on the present age academic nature.更多还原