节点文献

20世纪90年代传媒语境下的文学转向研究

Study on the Literature Shift in the Context of the Media in the Decade of the 20th Century

【作者】 刘文辉

【导师】 席扬;

【作者基本信息】 福建师范大学 , 中国现当代文学, 2008, 博士

【摘要】 20世纪90年代以来,传媒社会的崛起已经成为一个锐利的文化事实,它不仅宰制着人们感知世界的方式、对象和内容,而且也在重新组织和改造着人们的生活方式、审美风尚,甚至影响着人们传统的文化心理结构。本文把现代传媒所建构的历史语境作为研究20世纪90年代文学转向的文化景深,从“社会文化思潮”角度就“现代传媒与文学”范畴提出新问题,聚焦于“现代传媒语境”在整合刷新社会文化情势中“文学转向”的动态复杂性。本文没有对文学所有活动及其现象进行面面具到的关照,而是选取几个重要的问题进行探讨,在“问题”与“深入”层面体现创新性。本文选择了这样几个问题展开探讨:在“传媒视域中的文学生态”中,分别从作为消费文学、作为工具文学、作为精神创造的文学以及作为改造的文学等四个方面对进行论述,深度呈现文学各种功能的变化,具有一定的系统性和整体性;在“文学与意识形态的新关系”中,分析了在传媒覆盖下“新意识形态”及其“家族”的产生,分别从文学与国家主流意识形态的“暧昧遇合”、文学与商业/消费主义意识形态的“能指狂欢”、文学与精英意识形态的“异趣呈现”等几个方面论述了文学与意识形态的复杂性;在“作家姿态的复杂转向”中,不仅从大众文化写作转移、“触电”写作转移、个人化写作转移、日常化写作转移和其他形式写作转移等几个方面,论述了作家写作转移的复杂路向,而且分析了这种转移所产生的原因,并由此造成的美学困境;在文学“走向新民间”中,着重从文学叙事的民间视角开拓、文学叙事的审美范式转换、文学叙事的影视修辞征用以及“新民间”所带来的审美启蒙和人生启蒙,进行了深入阐释;在“文学自由的可能与不可能”中,主要从文学的媒介性、文学的策划性以及文学的经济性等几个维度,分析在20世纪90年代传媒语境下文学自由的可能与不可能;文章最后指出,只有文学作为人类的精神家园,才能使人“诗意地栖居”,由此,文学不仅永远不会终结,而且还会随着历史条件的变化,呈现出更加复杂多变的文化转向和异彩纷呈的生命姿态。

【Abstract】 Since the 1990s,the rise of the media community has become a powerful cultural fact,as it not only dominates people’s perception of the modes,objects and contents in the world but also in re-organizes and transforms people’s lifestyles,aesthetic fashion,and even influences people’s traditional cultural psychological structure.This dissertation presupposes the construction of modern media as the historical context of cultural depth of field in the 1990s,raises new issues from "social and cultural ideas" perspective on "Modern Media and Literature",focusing on "modern media Context" as to reconstruct and novelize the dynamic complexity in "literature transfer" in the new social and cultural modality.In this paper,not all of the activities and literary phenomena have been taken within the consideration,but only some important issues being selected in the "problem" and "in-depth" level of innovation.The choice of the following issues:"Literary Ecology in the Media Perspective",discussing from as consumer literature,tool literature,and spiritual as well as innovation literature to reflect literature variations of functions being systematic and complete;"the new relationship of Literature and Ideology," analyzing the "new ideology" under the media coverage,and the rising of "family" from literature and the national mainstream ideology "ambiguous harmony",literature and commercial/consumerism ideology "reference carnival",literature and elite ideological "reflection of fun" etc.,to reveal the complexity between literature and ideology;"Writers attitude to the complex transfer",not only providing the complex outline in writing transfer from the point of popular culture writing,"ad-lib" writing,personal writing,day-to-day writing and other forms of writing,but giving analysis of the causes and the result of plight in aesthetics;literature pointing "to the New Folk",conducting an in-depth explanation in the focus on literary narrative perspective of the civil development,aesthetic paradigm conversion,film Rhetoric expropriation and the "New Folk" brought about by the aesthetic Enlightenment and life Enlightenment;"the Possibility of Literature freedom",discussing the possibility of literature freedom in the 1990s mainly from literary dimensions of media,planning and economy;and finally pointing out that only literature can be as the human spiritual home,provides people "Poetic Habitation".As a result,literature not only will never end,but with the changes in historical conditions,it will present a more complex culture transfer and colorful life stance.

节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络