节点文献

福柯微观权力思想研究

A Study of the Foucault’s Thoughts of the Micro-Powers

【作者】 赵福生

【导师】 衣俊卿;

【作者基本信息】 黑龙江大学 , 马克思主义哲学, 2008, 博士

【副题名】兼论马克思哲学的微观视域

【摘要】 福柯的微观权力思想是关于人自身存在的哲学,其建立了人自身的历史存在论,其旨趣在于表达人自身的现时生存论。前者表明:通过不同于中心化、同质化的主权和法权的微观权力,现代西方人之所是、所行、所思和所愿以“必然”的形象在“主体”的实践中被建构,通过弥散的、异质的、多元的对他者的权力、对主体的权力、空间权力、规训权力和牧师权力等作用,“他者”、“主体”、“人”、“时空”、“反常”、“性”等观念以“真理”形式在现代西方社会的每一个细节中,在每一个主体的参与下被生产;后者表明:人的历史存在具有偶然性,人们可以寻求别样的生活,人自身具有超越性,超越的出路是拥有现代性态度,即理性批判、诗化生活和审美生存在当下关怀自身中的统一。福柯的微观权力分析形成了现代性的多维视角,将现代性由一元论和二元论推向了以制度、理念和态度为基础的多元论。沿着福柯对马克思的引证考察马克思的文本,马克思国民经济学的考古学、微观史学实践和微观监控分析以萌芽状态显现出来,这种显现表明了马克思宏观视域主导下的微观视域基础,为进一步理解马克思哲学的中介性以及文化哲学与微观政治哲学的合流提供了资源,也为我们研究日常生活的现代性提供了参考。

【Abstract】 Foucault’s thoughts of micro powers are of Ontology of human self, which’s about the historical Ontology of human self, whose aim lies in expressing the thinking of present existence of human self .The former indicates: what western modern human be, behave, think and will have been constructed in practice of“the subjectivity”in an inevitable image though micro-powers which is different from the centralized monobasic sovereignty and law power, the ideas of“the other”,“subjectivity”,“human”,“time and space”,“abnormal”,“sexuality”, etc. have been produced in every details of society in the form of“the truth”by the power on the other, on the subjectivity, power of space, discipline and pastor’s power which are dispersal, plural and differential reacting in multi-dimensions with every people participates. The latter indicates: The human’s history Ontology is by chance, people can look for other life styles, human self have surpass attributes, people can be more free than oneself feeling, the access is owning attitude of modernity , i.e. the unifying of rational judgment, the poem life and aesthetic existence at present. Foucault’s modernity analysis formed the multi-dimensions view of modernity, pushed the modernity from the monism and the dualism to the pluralistic universe which is based on system, idea and attitude. Investigating Marx’s texts along what was cited by Foucault, Marx’s archeology of political economics, micro historical analysis and study of supervision are in bud, showing the foundation of micro perspective of Marx’s predominant macro perspective, providing resources for comprehending the medium of Marx’s philosophy and the confluence of cultural philosophy and micro political philosophy, offering reference for studding modernity in daily life for us.

  • 【网络出版投稿人】 黑龙江大学
  • 【网络出版年期】2009年 02期
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络