【作者】 刘果；

【导师】 张三夕；

【作者基本信息】 华中师范大学 ， 中国古典文献学， 2007， 博士

【摘要】 本文试图通过对“三言”性别话语的细读和分析，反观“三言”创作者的性别意识和观念，探讨其历史源流，并思考这种观念与其文学表达(即话语，本文所说的话语，指的是“三言”特有的语境以及与之相关联的叙事方式)之间的关系。采用文献比勘这一经典的文献学方法实现文本细读，我们发现，“三言”中存在着两种性别话语的博弈。一是规范性性别话语(在本文的分析中简称为规范性话语)。这一话语深受主流性别规范的影响，是主流性别规范(以元典性别规范和理学性别观念为基本内容)在“三言”文本上的图解和演绎。二是与主流性别话语相冲突的非规范性性别话语(在本文的分析中简称为非规范性话语)，它源于对发乎本心的情欲的肯定，以本真性为其根本特征，又具有多种丰富而鲜活的表现形态。两种话语以各种形式向我们展现的竞争与冲突，让“三言”性别话语系统在呈现出错综复杂、千头万绪的面貌的同时，也绽放出因对抗、调和、妥协、战胜、和谐、解体等种种话语间的互动而独具的丰富性和层次感。本文第一章述论了晚明主流性别规范和非主流性别意识的基本内涵，以期勾勒“三言”生存的性别语境。这不仅试图为以下的“三言”性别话语提供一个较为宏阔的视野，也希望能借此避免常为人们诟病的“新批评”方法中“只见微观不见宏观”之弊。本文第二章博综前人考据成果，厘清了“三言”中宋元、明话本小说的分布情况以及宋元话本小说的存留情况，这是以话本小说的文献比勘为基础的“三言”性别话语研究的前提和工作平台。本文第三章讨论了“三言”对宋元同题话本小说的改写情况。本文第四、五章则分别以单篇和多篇文献比勘为基础讨论了同母题在“三言”宋元、明话本小说中的不同表现。通过这样的讨论，我们认为，以共时性角度观之，在“三言”的性别话语系统中，规范性话语占了比较明显的优势；而从历时性角度观之，宋元话本小说中的许多非规范性话语都在“三言”的明代演绎中表现出弱化趋势。更多还原

【Abstract】 Through the close reading and analyse of gender discourse in"Sanyan", the article wants to observe the gender thoughts of its authors, discuss their historic headstream ,and study the relationship bwteen gender thoughts and its literary expression.By using the methods of comparation, we found there are two basic discourse forms in "Sanyan",one is normative discourse,which is influenced by mainstream gender criterion,the other is non- normative discourse,which was conflicted with normative one. As the article has showed,the former ,however,was mainly composed of classic gender criterion and Neo-Confucianism gender thoughts.On the contrary,non-normative discourse was based on emotion which was rooted in one’s heart. With the counterwork and cooperateon of this two discourse, abundance and arrangements are presented,which make "Sanyan" take on full vitality.In the first chapter of this article, mainstream gender criterion and non-mainstream gender thoughts in late Ming dynasty are discussed in order to outline the gender background of "Sanyan"; scholars’ researches fruits are synthesized in chapter two,so that the scripts for story-telling (in Song and Yuan folk literature) and the novel written by storytellers of Ming dynasty are differentiated. With the discussion of chapter three, how the storytellers of Ming dynasty recomposited the same theme ones in Song and Yuan folk literature are showed;In the last two chapters, We addressed ourselves to the different textual representation bwteen Song and Yuan and Ming’s scripts in "Sanyan" under the same topics .As a results, we figure out that normative discourse dominated the gender discourse in "Sanyan",and non- normative discourses expressed in Song and Yuan scripts for story-telling take on weaken trendency in "Sanyan".更多还原