【作者】 邹志臣；

【导师】 张文显；

【作者基本信息】 吉林大学 ， 法学理论， 2006， 博士

【摘要】 行政契约本质上是私法中的契约在公法中的运用。该契约的出现给传统行政法的基本理论与实践带来了巨大的冲击。可以说，行政契约就是以私法中的契约的方式来实现行政权的行使，实现行政的目标，因此，行政契约的产生和发展就是公私法交融的一种表现。对于这种新的现象，我国法学界多立足于公法或私法的单一微观视角探讨行政契约的相关问题。这种单一而微观的研究视角无法实现理论的整合与方法的创新，也无法深入探讨行政契约本身在行政法基础理论中的意义。本文以公法与私法的衔接为视角，对行政契约的若干基础理论问题进行研究，以便为行政契约的制度建构提供基础性理论支撑，为行政法学的发展以及行政法学理论研究提供新的理论视角。 本文立足公、私法相链接这一新的理论视角论述了行政契约的成因与性质，提出了契约理念融入现代行政法的法理基础，阐释了行政契约的法律控制问题，并以行政征收制度为切入点实证性地探讨了契约理念在行政行为中的适用。最后，结合上述宏观性的制度法理指导我国行政契约的制度构建，简要地提出了行政契约的立法形式及制度设计构想，最后，本文指出了行政契约是现代行政法公法与私法交融的表现，公私交融是现代行政法发展的趋势，我国传统的行政法的观念需要改变。更多还原

【Abstract】 As the important content of private law, contracts have been widely used in the field of public law, among which the administrative contracts are outstanding. The essence of the administrative contracts is the private law contracts’ application in public law, whose appearance brought great impact on the fundamental theories and practices of the traditional administrative law. Equity is the essence of contracts, and the foundation of making contracts is the equal distribution of rights and duties. The administrative contracts realize the administrative power in the way of contract, or in the way of contract to regulate the administrative power. So the development of the administrative contracts is a kind of phenomena of combination of the public law and the private law, in the meantime also the necessary content in the process of legal development. Because of lack of necessary theoretical research angle and depth, most of Chinese scholars have been content with studying on the relative issues of administrative contracts from a single micro angle of either public law or private law. This kind of single-micro study angle is both dispersive and subjective itself, so it is impossible to realize the theoretical combination and methodological innovation. Due to the administrative contract fundamental theoretical study deficiency, there lacks analysis on a series of the fundamental theoretical and jurisprudence logical issues in the technological discussion under the angle, and it cannot provide fundamental theoretical support for the administrative contract mechanism更多还原