【作者】 谢彩霞；

【导师】 刘则渊； 梁立明；

【作者基本信息】 大连理工大学 ， 科学学与科技管理， 2006， 博士

【摘要】 在当今大科学时代,随着科学技术发展的日趋全球化、科学自身愈益加速的分化和综合性发展趋势的增强,科学合作日益成为科学研究的主流方式,成为发展大科学和解决全球化问题的主要途径,国内外各种科研组织和科研机构以新的方式新的思路参与合作研究。新的科学合作对于凝聚创新思想、获取科技信息、共享研究资源、培养和造就新时期复合型人才,在重要学科领域实现跨越式发展以及取得科学突破等方面具有十分重要的意义。正是在这一背景下,论文以现有关于科学合作的科学计量学研究成果为基础,将科学能力学和制度科学学的原理结合起来,运用科学计量学的最新方法,研究当代科学前沿主要领域国际合作方式与科学能力的关系,分析科学前沿国际合作的方式和动因,揭示科学合作方式对科学产出能力的影响,并引入网络分析法探讨纳米科技领域合作网络的特征及其对科研绩效与学科交叉的影响,从而在一定程度上为丰富和深化科学合作理论提供了科学依据和数据支持。 论文首先探讨了合作的本质和科学合作的涵义,在马克思主义生产力和生产关系理论以及科学能力学、政治科学学、制度科学学有关科研生产力与科研生产关系理论指导下,探究了科学合作的双重属性和双重功能,提出科学合作的中介作用。一方面,科学合作是作为体现人与自然关系的科研生产力中主体要素的科研主体合作,具有科研生产力的属性;另一方面,科学合作又是反映科研活动中人与人关系的特定科研生产关系的组成部分,又具有科研生产关系的属性。科学合作之所以影响科学活动发展,就在于科学合作具有科研生产力和科研生产关系的双重属性,扮演着科研生产力联接科研生产关系的中介桥梁作用,能够同时履行影响科研生产力和科研生产关系的双重功能。 在对科学合作方式及其功能的研究中,运用科学计量学的多种方法,展示出科学合作的动力因素,剖析主要动力因素及其互动关系,探讨科学合作的主要结构形式及其影响,并对科研机构内外科学合作方式与特征进行了计量研究,从而展现出作为科研生产关系的科学合作方式的多样性;同时,对科学合作方式与科研生产力之间关系进行量化分析,研究当代科学前沿主要领域国际合作方式与科学能力的关系,分析科学前沿国际合作的方式和动因,揭示科学合作方式对科学产出能力的影响,表明不同的科学合作方式会影响并导致科研生产力的不同功能。 作为对具体学科领域科学合作的研究,我们选取国际纳米科技领域的科学合作状况作为研究对象。首先从科学家、机构、国家、学科四个方面对纳米科技领域科学合作状况进行计量分析,探讨该领域科学合作对科研绩效的促进作用。然后借助网络分析方法考察国际纳米科技领域的科学合作状况,展现出科学合作在纳米科技活动中的绝对优势更多还原

【Abstract】 In today’s big science ages, scientific collaboration is increasingly becoming the main quomodo of science research and the main way of developing big science and resolving global problems as the globalizing development of science and technology and as the buildup of analysis and synthesis trend in science itself development. All kinds of domestic and overseas organizations and institutions participate in collaborative research in new modes and new ideas. Scientific collaboration plays an important role in cohering creative thought, getting scientific information, sharing resource, shaping talents with compounding ability in new period, realizing striding development and obtaining the breakthrough in important scientific fields. Just under the background, regarding scientific collaboration as research object, we study its essential law, explore its happening motive, investigate its evolving patterns, show its activity scale from the levels of district, organization and subject, survey the main field, section and subject where it happens. As a research example, we explore the status of collaborative research in nanotechnology field.In this study, we survey the essence of collaboration and the meaning of scientific collaboration firstly. Under the guidance of Marxian theory of productivity and relations of production, and the theory of science productivity and relations of science production in Scientific Capacity of Society, Politics of Science and Institutional Science Studies, we put forward the double functions and double attributions of scientific collaboration under the background of big science. Scientific collaboration is not only the integration model of all the scientific research productivity factors, but also a foundation and precondition of the relations of production. The relations of scientific collaboration are realized in the progress of productivity developing, and it is the social relationship among all the productivity factors and relationship among scientifico in science field. Science collaboration is not only as the collaboration among science producers who are the main body of scientific research, but also as the special relations of production in the science activity. Scientific collaboration is the bridge and tie between science productivity and the relations of science production.Then we analyze quantitatively the method of scientific collaboration and the motivation which leads to scientific collaboration and the problems which happened in the progress of scientific collaboration. Using the method of word frequency analysis, we show the motivation factors of scientific collaboration and dissect the different influence according to the time changing. Co-occurrence analysis is done to the mutul funcation of the motivationfactor. And we also study the main structure of the scientific collaboration and the model of scientific collaboration of research institution. At the same time we study the function of research productivity of scientific collaboration and its method. Using content analysis method, we investigate the attribution of research productivity of scientific collaboration and effect on research achievement. We study the model of scientific collaboration on improvement of research productivity and enhance the quality of research production. At the same time we study quantitatively the status of intersection and interdisciplinary scientific collaboration.As a case of scientific collaboration, we review the status of scientific collaboration in nanotechnology. We analyze the general level from the four facets of scientist, institution, country and subject and the improvement to research achievement by citation analysis. Using the method of network analysis we show the characteristic of network in nanotechnology. Our main aim is trying to find the whole law and model of scientific collaboration and to put forward some valuable information for policy-makers and manager in nanotechnology research.更多还原