建安文学专题研究

【作者】 施建军；

【导师】 杨明；

【作者基本信息】 复旦大学 ， 中国古代文学， 2004， 博士

【摘要】 本论文是关于建安文学的专题研究。 第一章、第二章主要是以论题为纲、以相关批评为目，对古人留下的建安文学批评资料进行有针对性的清理。如在所谓“建安体”的论题下，将古人的相关批评整合在一起，藉此可以加深今人对建安文学特色的认识。 第三章是对二十世纪的建安文学研究所作的评述，旨在尽量全面地展示这一百年来的重要的、有代表性的研究成果，作者的按断时不时掺杂其间。 第四章论述曹操与建安诸文士之间的关系。认为限于种种原因，曹操不会重视，更不会重用建安诸文士。诸文士志不得伸的不平之鸣，成为建安时期文学的一项重要内容。 第五章、第六章探讨曹氏兄弟争嗣本末及其影响的问题，深化了学术界对这一问题的认识，并提出一些新的见解。如曹氏兄弟争嗣始于建安十六年(211)以后，丁仪、丁虞比杨修对曹丕的危害更大等。更多还原

【Abstract】 The dissertation is a monographic study of Jian’an literature.Taking topics as "the head rope" and criticism relative to them as "the meshes", chapter 1 and 2 are supposed to arrange the critical data about Jian’an literature left over by the ancients. For example, under the topic of so-called "Jian’an-style", the ancients’ criticism relative to it is put together, by which contemporaries can have a deep understanding of the artistic characteristics of Jian’an literature.Chapter 3 is a review of the study of Jian’an literature in the 20th century intending to display the important and typical study achievements as comprehensively as possible. The author’s own opinions appear in the review time and time again.Chapter 4 discusses the relation between Caocao and Jian’an literati. It’s the author’s viewpoint that due to some reasons, Caocao could not attach much importance to Jian’an literati, could not put them in important positions too. Jian’an literati’s elegies caused by their lofty aspirations unrealized are an important component of the literature in Jian’an period.Chapter 5 and 6 focus on the event that Caopi and Caozhi vied for the status to become a crown prince; probe into the whole story from beginning to end, and it’s great influence as well. Some new views are put forward. For instance, the event came into being after 211 AD; To Caopi, the more frightful threat is Dingyi(for "丁仪" ) and Dingyi(for "丁廙 ") but not Yangxiu, etc.更多还原