【作者】 刘志云；

【导师】 徐崇利；

【作者基本信息】 厦门大学 ， 国际法学， 2004， 博士

【摘要】 自20世纪80年代中期，尤其是冷战结束以来，随着经济全球化的迅猛发展，国际经济领域掀起一股包括单边、双边、区域以及多边层次的、以自由化为中心的造法运动，并初步构建出一个全球自由市场秩序体系。本文是一种立足于经济学、国际关系理论与政治学等对国际经济法律自由化的若干理论问题所进行的跨学科研究。全文分为绪言、正文和结束语等三部分，其中正文共分四章。 绪言部分是对开展国际经济法律自由化理论研究的几个先决问题进行的探讨，为正文的理论研究做好必要的铺垫工作。包括：对研究对象的界定，即确定国际经济法律自由化的内涵与特征；对研究范围的界定，即确定正文所要研究的几个重要理论问题；对当前流行的概念澄清，即对国际经济法律自由化与法律全球化的概念作出比较；最后是需要说明的几个问题，即对本文的研究方法、研究主线以及注释体例等作出必要的解释或提示。 第一章是对国际经济法律自由化的经济学理论基础的研究，主旨在于揭示晚近国际经济法律自由化为什么是以“自由化”，而不是“反自由化”为主旋律。围绕这一主旨，本章首先分析了研究国际经济法律自由化的经济学理论基础的重要性，再对二战结束直至新自由主义经济理论兴起前，各国主流经济学理论对国际经济法律自由化所造成的不同影响进行探讨。在此基础上，从新自由主义经济理论的视角，对晚近国际经济法律自由化的勃兴，及其在追求形式的“程序正义”同时，陷入“社会正义”缺失的困境等问题作出比较深入的研究。最后，对新自由主义经济理论可能给国际经济法律自由化带来的进一步影响以及前景作出预测。 第二章是对国际经济法律自由化的国际关系理论背景的探讨，主旨在于解释不同类型的国家之间为什么能够从原先对国际经济法律自由化的“对抗”，到晚近“合作”的态度转变。围绕这一主旨，本章首先从国际法与国际关系的联系以及两者理论研究相互影响的分析入手，阐明探讨国际经济法国际经济法律自由化的若干理论问题研究律自由化的国际关系理论背景的必要性。然后，再对二战结束以来占据主流的国际关系理论给国际经济法律自由化所带来的不同影响或解释作出概述。在此基础上，从新自由制度主义理论的视角，对不同类型的国家之间晚近开展的国际经济法律自由化的合作作出比较详细的理论解释，并对这种解释或影响的不足之处进行探究。最后，提出国际关系理论对国际经济法律自由化进一步研究的展望。 第三章是对国际经济法律自由化中的经济主权问题的探讨，主旨在于揭示在经济全球化的背景下，各国参与本身就是经济主权传统制度变迁过程的国际经济法律自由化的内在动机，亦即经济主权传统制度变迁的实质所在。围绕这一主旨、本章首先对经济主权理论作出简要回顾，并对当前西方学界甚嚣尘上的主权“淡化论”、“过时论”以及“消亡论”等作出分析。然后，再运用辩证唯物主义与历史唯物主义所提供的分析方法，对经济主权的层次以及各层次的不同特征进行深入剖析，从而揭开各国参与国际经济法律自由化的动机所在，亦即晚近经济主权传统制度变迁的实质。在此基础上，立足于国家主权的视野，对国家主权的历史性、工具性以及国家主权与主权国家同体性等特征进行一一分析，从而得出在经济全球化背景下，各国，尤其是发展中国家，对经济主权原则与国际经济法律自由化的观念转变、功能利用以及未来发展趋势上的正确应对。 第四章是对国际经济法律自由化的公平价值取向的研究，主旨在于为晚近追求形式的“程序正义”立法倾向的同时，却陷入“社会正义”缺失的困境的国际经济法律自由化寻找今后正确的发展途径。围绕这一主旨，本章首先分析了晚近国际经济法律自由化在追求形式的“程序正义”倾向的同时，陷入“社会正义”缺失的困境与原因。然后，再对正义内涵的历史发展，以及当代自由主义理论内部对正义内涵的争论作出简要回顾与比较。在此基础上，对罗尔斯的复数正义原则在国际社会的适用性，以及在具体适用中国际经济法的角色定位与具体制度的建构，作出较为深入的探讨。最后，对发展中国家今后在国际经济法律自由化的公平价值取向中的正确角色定位以及战略选择提出若干建议。内容摘要 结束语是对正文的简单概括，同时提出了对国际经济法律自由化进一步发展的预测与展望。更多还原

【Abstract】 Since the middle of 1980s, especially the end of the Cold War, with the fast growth of economic globalization, in the field of international economy, the liberalization-oriented law-making has emerged at unilateral, bilateral, multilateral and global levels, which resulted in a preliminary rules mechanism in the global free market. This dissertation of trans-disciplinary studies about the liberalization of international economic law from the perspectives of economics, international relations theory and politics. The whole thing is constructed into four parts in addition to the preface and conclusion.In the preface, the author discusses some prerequisites for the research into theoretical issues of the liberalization of international economic law, which, firstly, defines the subject of this work, namely, the definition of law liberalization and its connotation and characteristics; as well as the research scope, secondly, compares the concept of law liberalization with the popular term of law globalization, and finally, explains the main theme and approaches, the principal clew and the note therein.In the first chapter, the discussion explores the economic foundation of the liberalization of the international economic law, with the aim of demonstrating why the mainstream is liberalization but not anti-liberalization. At first, the author demonstrates the necessity of studying the economic foundation of law liberalization, and then probes into the various influences imposed by the major economic theories, after the end of World War II and before the rise of Neo-liberal Economics in different countries. From the view of the Neo-liberal Economics, the author makes a deep probe into the surge of the liberalization of international economic law-making and the dilemma that international community unfortunately faces in the course of pursing fairness and efficiency simultaneously.In the second chapter, the author examines the law liberalization from the perspective of international relations theory. The main purpose is to elucidate the transfer of the attitudes, from "confrontation" to "cooperation", among different countries in the international negotiation. Based on that, the author discusses the necessity of studying the theory of international relations through analyzing the relationship, including interactions, between international relations and international law. Different influences imposed by major international relations theories after World War Hare discussed. And them, from the perspective of Neo-liberal Institutionalism, theoretical interpretation is provided about the cooperation among different nations in promoting the liberalization of international economic law; and the shortage of the interpretation is also deeply probed.The third chapter is the exploration of economic sovereignty. In the context of international economic law liberalization, the author traces the vicissitude of the traditional system of economic sovereignty of each country. Concentrating on this subject, this author reviews the theory of economic sovereignty in brief at the very beginning and then analyses the rampant attitude of sovereignty, such as "dilution of sovereignty" and "perdition of sovereignty", in western countries. After this, the author applies the material dialectic to explain the essence of sovereignty in order to work out a convincing conclusion of the vicissitude of the traditional system of economic sovereignty. From the perspective of national sovereignty, the author discusses the history, instrumentality and consubstantiality of sovereignty and nationality. Drawing from this discussion, the author concludes the measures of how to cope with the transition of the ideology of sovereignty and international economic liberalization, utilize the functions and the future trend.The value of fairness of the liberalization of international economic law is the main subject of the chapter four. In this part, the author aims to seek a proper course for the liberalization of international economic law, which is deeply trappe更多还原