我国高校研究生培养模式研究

【作者】 胡玲琳；

【导师】 谢安邦；

【作者基本信息】 华东师范大学 ， 高等教育学， 2004， 博士

【摘要】 学术型研究生培养模式与应用型研究生培养模式并存是国外研究生培养模式发展的共同趋势，也是目前我国研究生培养模式改革的主要方向。本文以研究生培养模式研究为切入点，核心问题是对两种研究生培养模式进行本质区分，目的在于建构我国高校两种各具特色的研究生培养模式。论文研究过程中遵循历史与现实、国际与本土、理论与实践相结合的方法论，从四部分对我国高校研究生培养模式进行研究。 第一部分是引论，首先从总体上阐述论文选题的缘由与选题意义、研究现状及相关述评、研究方法和基本原则以及基本思路与研究内容。其次，通过模式论与系统论的结合，对研究生培养模式的相关概念、基本要素以及要素的内外关系等进行纯学理研究，这部分研究构成论文研究的“基本理论”，为全文研究提供一个“分析框架”。 第二部分包括第二章与第三章，从国内与国外、纵向与横向两个维度，对研究生培养模式的发展历程和现状进行分析与比较。第二章考察了我国高校研究生培养模式的历史沿革，揭示我国高校研究生培养模式已开始逐步从单一走向双元模式；同时，通过对北京、上海、江苏、浙江、广州、湖北、辽宁等不同地区十所高校研究生培养情况的现状分析，探究高校研究生培养模式的症结所在，其中，培养目标与社会发展需求脱节和高校两种研究生培养模式“雷同”是我国高校研究生培养模式存在的主要问题。第三章对德国、美国、英国三国研究生培养模式的演变轨迹进行回顾与梳理，简要分析三国研究生培养模式的现实状况，并总结发达国家研究生培养模式发展的基本规律与共同特征，为我国高校研究生培养模式的理论分析和模式建构提供借鉴。 第三部分即第四章，为解决目前我国高校研究生培养模式存在的主要问题，本章通过探源影响我国高校研究生培养模式变革的理论与现实因素，揭示我国高校研究生培养模式变革的缘由；在此基础上，对两种研究生培养模式的价值取向、性质特征、培养对象、层次结构等方面进行重新定位与区分，为建构我国高校两种研究生培养模式提供理论依据。 第四部分包括第五章与第六章，建构适合我国国情的、各具特色的两种研究生培养模式，以及提出实现两种培养模式并存的若干保障措施。第五章针对我国现行研究生培齐模式的弊端、参照国外研究生培养模式的共性、以及研究生培养模式变革的基本理论等为立论依据，对我国高校两种研究生培养模式进行重新建构；第六章为使我国高校两种研究生培养模式“并行不悖、各有侧重”，论文最后从转变观念、制度创新、政策扶持三方面提出保障措施。更多还原

【Abstract】 The coexistent of academic graduate cultivating model and professional graduate cultivating model is not only the common tendency in foreign countries, but also a primary direction for graduate cultivating model reform in our country. This dissertation focuses on the research of graduate cultivating models. The main point is to differentiate the two kinds of model in essence, which aims to structure the two graduate cultivating models with the respective characteristics. The methodology combining the history with reality, home with abroad, theory with practice is followed in the process of research, and the whole dissertation includes four parts as below:First part is introduction, generally giving the cause and meaning of the topic, presenting the condition of study, relevant reviews, research methods, basic thinking and content. Meanwhile, combining the modular theory with systematic theory, author makes a purely theoretical research on the related concepts, basic elements, and context of the graduate cultivating models. This part forms the theoretical basis, as a framework of the whole dissertation.Part two consists of chapter two and chapter three. Author does analysis and comparison from the development of the history and present condition of graduate cultivating models in terms of two dimensions, home and abroad, horizontal and vertical. Chapter two introduces the history of graduate cultivating model of our country, which shows that this model is in the process of transformation from singleness to duality. Meanwhile, with the analysis of present condition of ten universities from different regions (Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, zhejiang, Guangzhou, Hubei, and liaoning), the author works out two main issues of the model, namely, the disconnection of cultivating objective with social development and the resemblance of two models. Chapter three reviews the development process of gradate cultivating model in U.K., U.S. and Germany, analyze the present condition briefly, and generalizes the basic rules and common character of graduate cultivating models in developed country which works as a important reference to theoretic analysis and structure of models in our country.Part three is chapter four. To resolve the key problem in the present graduate cultivating model, this part discusses theoretically a realistic factor that affects the reform of the graduate cultivating model, and illustrates the reason for this reform. On basis of these, the author differentiates the value, characteristics, cultivating object and level of two models,which provide theoretical basis to structure the two cultivating models.Part four covers chapter five and chapter six. It builds two graduate cultivating models fit for the Chinese condition with the respective feature, and proposes some assurance measurements for the coexistence of two models. In the chapter five, in the light to the malpractices of current models in China, with reference of commonality of foreign models, and on basis of the basic principle of graduate cultivating model reform, the author restructures the models of graduate education. In the last chapter, to achieve the result of coexistence with respective emphasis, the author gives some assurance measurements in three aspects, idea transformation, system innovation, and policy support.更多还原