【作者】 赵薇；

【导师】 周颂伦；

【作者基本信息】 东北师范大学 ， 专门史， 2014， 博士

【摘要】 白鸟库吉（1865-1942）是日本东洋史学创始人之一，毕生致力于日本东洋史学体系的构建，其研究成果至今仍为国内外东亚史、亚洲史研究者重视，学术影响深远。白鸟库吉的史学研究，以文献考证为基础，同时注重实际调查，研究成果大多同当时的社会活动相关联，这成就了他宏阔的研究视野；研究方法上，具有西方学术背景的白鸟库吉开辟了日本实证主义史学研究的先河，并将语言学、地理学、民族学知识综合运用于史学研究，可谓推陈出新、独树一帜；通过为学术研究寻找政治依托及学术讨论等，白鸟库吉还组成了以自己为核心的学术团队，奠定了日本东洋史学东京文献学派发展的基础。学术研究，不可能脱离时代。白鸟库吉曾不止一次地表白自己的学问是“纯学术的”，对于这一问题，我们认为，只从单个具体研究对象看来，其关于东洋史的研究是站在学术立场上的学术研究；但纵观白鸟库吉的整个学术生涯，深入剖析白鸟库吉的研究结论，将其还原到当时的社会历史背景中，我们看到，他通过“学术”，彰显了近代日本的“国威”，其学术研究进程与日本对中国乃至整个亚洲的侵略步骤相吻合，从最初的对朝鲜史的研究，到“满洲”、中国，再到亚洲其他民族的研究，以及最后关于蒙古的研究无一不是追随、配合日本对朝鲜、“满洲”、中国乃至亚洲的侵略步伐。白鸟库吉的史学研究核心是围绕着中国展开的，本文以白鸟库吉学术研究开展的时间为序，全面讨论其中国观问题。主要以白鸟库吉的朝鲜史、“满洲”问题、“满鲜历史地理调查部”的设立、国体论、时局论、中国文化论以及蒙古史等作为研究对象，对白鸟库吉提出的“满洲中立地带论”、“尧舜禹抹杀论”、“中国文明停滞”论等问题进行细致分析，从中剥离出白鸟库吉对中国历史、文化、政治等问题的基本观点。此外，还将目光扩展到亚洲，从白鸟库吉对亚洲的研究态度、立场观点等来进一步挖掘其中国观的本质与内涵。由于以白鸟库吉为首的日本东洋史学家在确定“东洋”的范围时是把日本排除在外的，所以作为对比研究，本文还对白鸟库吉的“皇国史观”、“日本优越论”等问题做以细致分析，以进一步明确白鸟库吉的中国观、亚洲观的时代性及政治意义。本文在采用史料辨析、逻辑论证等基本研究方法的基础上，把白鸟库吉的整个学术生涯按照研究重点和倾向的不同分为三个阶段，从白鸟库吉自身不同的研究重点与方向上定位白鸟库吉中国观的形成、发展和扩展。同时，在白鸟库吉的每个学术阶段中展开横向研究，分别关注不同时期的研究动机、学术背景、具体内容等，以明确白鸟库吉中国观的本质与内涵，并试图从更广阔的视角揭示隐藏在白鸟库吉中国观背后的日本东洋史学的学术倾向，探寻白鸟库吉中国观与战时日本政府和军部对中国政策之间的内在关联性。白鸟库吉关于日本东洋史学的研究是站在学术立场上的学术研究，但研究带有浓厚的情意性倾向，首先，其中国观是带有浓厚情意倾向的中国观。其次，白鸟库吉关于日本东洋史学的研究就是基于对中国资料、古迹等“有形”的文化攫掠与“疑古”、“抹杀”等“无形”的文化攻击基础之上，所以，其中国观是渗透文化侵略的中国观。再次，无论从白鸟库吉的学术研究路线、学术研究内容还是学术研究理论上来看，其中国观都起到了为现实政治服务的目的。日本东洋史学是伴随着日本对朝鲜、中国等亚洲国家的侵略而建立起来的，而白鸟库吉的学术不但在思想上配合了日本“大陆政策”的进展，而且在某种程度上起到了巩固日本政局，为日本对外侵略提供理论依据的作用。所以，其中国观是为现实政治服务的中国观。更多还原

【Abstract】 Siratorikurakiti（1865-1942）is one of the originators of the research of Oriental history.He devotes himself to constructing the system of the Oriental history in Japan, whose researchis profound and valuable. Siratorikurakiti’s research on history is based on textual researchand put an emphasis on survey. Most of the research results are always connected with thesocial activities, which leads to the broad horizon of his research. As for the research method,with his western academic background, Siratorikurakiti starts the empirical research onhistory in Japan. He integrates linguistics, geography and ethnology into the history research.Siratorikurakiti sets up his academic community, which establishes the basis of Tokyoliterature school. The academic research cannot be isolated from the era. Siratorikurakiticlears up repeatedly that his research is “purely academic”. As far as this issue is concerned,we suppose that concerning the research object, his research is actually academic, butconcerning his research course, the analysis of his research results, the social historicalbackground, Siratorikurakiti manifests Japanese “national strength”. His research processcoincides with the paces of Japan’s invasion into China and the entire Asia. All researches,ranging from the research on North Korea, to Manchuria, China and other nations in Asia,match up with Japan’s invasion procedures.The core of Siratorikurakiti’s history research focuses on China. This paper based on thechronological study of Siratorikurakiti’s academic research discusses the issue of the view ofChina. This paper mainly aims at the history of North Korea, Manchuria issues, theestablishment of “Manchuria railway joint-stock Co., LTD”,“the state system”, the currentpolitical situation and the history of Mongolia and analyzes in details the issues, including“Manchuria as neutral ground”,“denial about Yao, Shun and Yu” and “Chinese culturalstagnation” and summarizes Siratorikurakiti’s views on Chinese history, culture, politics andso on. Furthermore, this paper explores the nature and connotation by the analysis ofSiratorikurakiti’s attitudes and viewpoints on Asia. Since the Oriental historians, led bySiratorikurakiti, exclude Japan from the scale of the Orient, this paper as a comparative studyanalyzes issues such as “the emperor country history”,“Japanese supremacy” so as to clarifythe significance of Siratorikurakiti’s view of China and Siratorikurakiti’s view of Asia.Based on the historical data and logical demonstration, his paper divides Siratorikurakiti’sresearch course into three stages and defines the establishment, development and extension ofSiratorikurakiti’s view of China from the aspect of his specific research emphases anddirection. Meantime, a horizontal research is carried out during the analysis of the respectivestage, including research motivation, academic background, concrete content to clarify the nature and connotation of Siratorikurakiti’s view of China, to reveal the academic tendency ofOriental history in Japan, and to explore the internal relationship between Siratorikurakiti’sview of China and Japanes wartime policies to China.Although Siratorikurakiti’s Oriental research is academic, it is also affection-oriented.Firstly, the view of China is deeply affection-oriented. Secondly, his research is based on“visible” cultural plunder of Chinese materials and archaeology and “invisible” culturalaggression via doubt and denial. Therefore, Siratorikurakiti’s view of China is culturallyaggressive. Thirdly, with regard to his research route, research content and research theory,Siratorikurakiti’s view of China serves the realpolitik. The Oriental history is establishedalong with Japan’s aggression into Asian countries, such as North Korea and China.Siratorikurakiti’s academy not only coordinates with the advance of Japan’s “mainlandpolicy”, but it also consolidates, to some extent, Japanese political situation and providestheoretical evidence for Japanese foreign aggression. Hence, Siratorikurakiti’s view of Chinaserves the realpolitik.更多还原