【作者】 姜海涛；

【导师】 张奎良；

【作者基本信息】 黑龙江大学 ， 马克思主义哲学， 2014， 博士

【摘要】 马克思曾预言，随着资本主义的不断发展，社会关系将趋于简单化并形成更为严格的阶级对立，工人阶级随着贫困化的加剧必然导致革命意识的日益增长，最终将推翻资本主义的统治。然而，资本主义国家不断通过自身调整稳步发展，工人阶级非但没有因贫困而革命，反而因为产业结构的调整和新技术革命的发生变得复杂化和碎片化。在这样的背景下，一些马克思主义学者认为作为有组织的、具有内聚力的社会群体的工人阶级已经不存在了，他们开始放弃历史唯物主义的宏大叙事主张，努力寻求一种能够适应新形势的革命规划。以拉克劳与墨菲为重要代表人物的后马克思主义应运而生。拉克劳和墨菲在《领导权与社会主义策略》中提出了一种以领导权为核心的激进民主策略，试图在迎合当代社会多样化发展的同时，保持马克思主义的激进性。这一研究代表了当代西方马克思主义的一个新方向。拉克劳和墨菲的领导权理论实质上是一种向现实世界的妥协。这种妥协不仅表现在其对于解释世界的分外热衷，更为重要的在于其所内含的语言学本质使这一理论最终变成了一种话语革命。本论文的主要工作就是梳理拉克劳和墨菲领导权理论产生的历史和社会背景，分析了对领导权理论有影响力的一些思想资源。重点在于对拉克劳与墨菲的领导权理论的哲学基础和基本内涵进行分析。同时探讨了他们的社会主义新策略——多元激进民主的三重向度和他们对社会主义的重建。最后试图从当代哲学的多个视域透视拉克劳与墨菲领导权理论的当代效应及理论局限。更多还原

【Abstract】 Marx once predicted that with the continuous development of Capitalism, socialrelations would tend to be simplified, producing more real class antagonisms, and theworking class, with a growing awareness of the revolution inevitably developed duringthe process of the intensified pauperization, would eventually overthrow the Capitalism.However, an indisputable fact of the history after the World War II is that capitalistcountries continue to move ahead through their own constant adjustment, and theworking class hasn’t become revolutionary due to poverty, on the contrary becomecomplicated and fragmented because of the adjustment of industrial structure as well asthe new technological revolution. In this context, some Marxist scholars believed thatthe working class, as an organized and cohesive social group, no longer existed. Theybegan to abandon the ambitious interpretation of historical materialism and make anattempt to find a revolution planning suitable for the new situation of the Post-Fordcapitalism and the transnational capitalism. So the Post-Marxism came into being withLaclau and Mouffe as important representatives.Laclau and Mouffe put forward the radical democratic strategy of hegemony as acore in the Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. He trying to cater to contemporarydiversified social development and keeping the Marx doctrine of radical at the sametime. The study represents a new direction of contemporary western doctrine ofMarxism. The hegemony theory of Laclau and Mouffe is a compromise to the realworld in essence. The compromise is not only reflected that he is zealous in interpretingthe world, more important is that the nature of the language makes this theory becamea discourse revolution in the end.The main work of this paper is explaining thehistorical and social background of Laclau and Mouffe’s hegemony theory. It analyzes some thought resources that have influence on hegemony theory. The point is analyzesthat the philosophical foundation and the basic connotation of the Laclau and Mouffe’shegemony theory. Meanwhile it explores their new socialist strategy–radical pluralisticdemoeracy three to the reconstruction of socialist. Finally, it tries to penetrate thepresent effect and limitation of theory of Laclau and Mouffe’s hegemony theory frommultiple perspectives of the contemporary philosophy.更多还原