【作者】 姜丽；

【导师】 王承略；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 中国古典文献学， 2014， 博士

【摘要】 根据史志目录的载录情况推测,笔记体的产生之与“小说”有密切的关系,其内容来源与内容范围,有相当的一致性。后世学者则借其体制上的自由性,扩大其内容范围,成为无所不包的“大杂烩”。到宋代,学术性笔记高涨,历史琐闻、考辨笔记是主要的体类,传奇、神异类小说则大有消退之势。本文的研究对象是宋人笔记中有关《诗经》的论述材料,据其内容分为：基本问题研究、音韵文字考辨、诗旨经义探讨、名物制度训释、诗学理论阐述、史事人物评论六个部分。“基本问题研究”的材料涵盖了《诗经》体制内的大部分问题。宋人勇于疑古,《诗经》不能例外,从文本到体制,凡可称想处,宋人无不措手。疑问的提出,新说的倡言,带动了学者从更加广泛的视野、以更开阔的思路去考量《诗经》,其成就自不待言,而其鲁莽也颇为后人诟病。“音韵文字考辨”综合运用了音韵学、文字学、训诂学的新理论成果,重新诠释《诗经》字词音义。这一部分用总结义例的方法,重在展示宋人辨析字词的途径。“诗旨经义探讨”是宋人治经“直探本义”要求的实践,对《诗经》体制问题的置疑、字词的重新诠释与对诗旨经义的重新解说,三者是息息相关的,可谓一变俱变。“名物制度训释”也是治经的一个传统科目,既包含古人对自然科学知识的理解、认知,也包括对传统典章制度的考索、探求。宋代科技的进步,不惟带来对纯粹客观知识的新认识,也带动对制度、文化等抽象事物的进一步辨析。当然,对于后者来说,史学的发达是其更直接的推动因素。“诗学理论阐述”是以《诗经》为诗歌创作范式并借之掘取、阐发诗学主张。“史事人物评论”存在两种情况,一是对《诗经》文本中所涉史事、人物的考评,一是对其它朝代的史事、人物借《诗经》语言进行评判。全文虽以专题为框架,但主要采用评点的方式写作,而不是作专题研究,这是由笔记独特的体式所决定的。更多还原

【Abstract】 According to the records of catalogues in the historical works, it can be speculated that the literary sketchbook seems to be related with the "talk of the town" at the beginning, they are very consistent in source and range of content. In view of its stylistic flexibility, the scholars in the future generations expand its range of content, and make it an all-encompassing "hodgepodge". To the Song Dynasty, academic sketchbooks ran high, and the main types are historical anecdote and confirmation sketchbooks. At the same time, legends and supernatural stories are on the decrease. In this dissertation, the object of study is the argued materials about the Book of Songs in the sketchbooks of Song Dynasty. According to its contents, it can be divided into six parts, including basic problems research, confirming phonology and words, discussing the substance of the Book of Songs, annotating the naming things and systems, expounding the poetic theory and comment on historical events and persons. Materials about "basic problems research" cover most issues in the system of the Book of Songs. The scholars in Song Dynasty had the courage to doubt, and the Book of Songs was doubted in many respects that can be considered from the text to the literary form. New questions and views led the scholars to study the Book of Songs in a broader perspective and a more open mind, so they got achievements, but it was also criticized because of their precipitance."Confirming phonology and words" widely uses the new theoretical results of phonology, philology and exegetics to reinterpret the pronunciation and meanings of words in the Book of Songs. The main aim of this part is to show the methods which are used to discriminate the words in the Book of Songs by summarizing examples."Discussing the substance of the Book of Songs" practiced the requirements of "rediscovering the original meaning" in the study of Confucian classics in Song Dynasty. Suspicion about the literary form of the Book of Songs, reinterpreting the words and reexplaining the substance, the three aspects are so related that if one changes,other two must follow."Annotating the naming things and systems" is also a traditional subject in the study of Confucian classics, which not only contains ancient’s understanding and cognition about natural sciences, but also contains investigation and exploration about the traditional laws and regulations. Advancement of science and technology in Song Dynasty not only brought new knowledge about the objective world, also led to further discrimination of institution, culture and other abstract aspects. Of course, for the latter one, the development of history is a more direct driver."Expounding the poetic theory" considers the Book of Songs as the writing model, and tries to excavate and interpret the poetics views by it. There are two cases in "comment on historical events and persons". One is investigating and evaluating the historical events and persons that were covered in the Book of Songs, and the other is to evaluate historical events and persons in other dynasties by the language of the Book of Songs. Although the dissertation uses the topics as a framework, the main way of writing is comment, rather than monographic study, which is determined by the unique style of the literary sketchbooks.更多还原