【作者】 蒋红艳；

【导师】 郑大华；

【作者基本信息】 湖南师范大学 ， 中国近现代史， 2014， 博士

【摘要】 《复兴月刊》创刊于1932年6月,是应九一八事变后中国形势变化而生的刊物之一。它以“集合全国有志致力学养,共图国家及社会之新建设”为宗旨,致力于“研究适应现代需要之建设计划,并依据国情,参酌国际大势,探讨民族复兴之途径”,因而民族复兴思想是其最重要的思想创获。故本论文主要以《复兴月刊》的政治话语为中心,考察《复兴月刊》民族复兴思想,试图揭示其复兴思想的特色并借此展现1930年代蓬勃兴起的民族复兴思潮的某些面相,深化中国近代思想文化史的研究。就内容而言,本论文共分绪论、正文(共六章)、结语(余论)三个部分。其中绪论部分介绍本论文的选题旨趣、研究现状、研究思路以及论文的创新与不足之处。正文第一章从《复兴月刊》的宗旨、编辑发行、作者群及社会影响等方面,考察《复兴月刊》的概况,为后文的展开,提供一个认知基础。第二章是对民族复兴的基点——“心理建设”的详细论述。《复兴月刊》认为心理建设是民族复兴的基点,是物质建设的先决条件,民族复兴的根本途径,凸显了精神力量在民族复兴中的作用。本章还指出《复兴月刊》的民族复兴思想体现在心理、政治、经济、文化教育等方面,它们看似分散,其实是一个一以贯之的整体,是一个完整的复兴民族方案。在这个方案中,心理建设是基点,政治建设是民族复兴的关键,其中《复兴月刊》在政治上着力尤多,因为它认为政治是解决一切问题的先决条件,因而,其民族复兴思想具有“政治优先”的特点。第三、四章围绕《复兴月刊》与九一八后的宪政运动及法西斯主义思潮的互动而展开论述,这部分是《复兴月刊》在政治层面对民族复兴的具体观照。第五章主要论述《复兴月刊》在调适理想与现实的基础上,对政治出路做出了自己的选择即强力政治。第六章主要比较了《复兴月刊》与《再生》杂志两刊物的民族复兴思想,意在推导出在“民族复兴”这套相同的话语模式下,二者皆服务于民族主义,是知识分子言论报国的产物,二者亦都指出“民族复兴”是旨在建构一个近代的民族国家,其中既有对传统的继承,也有对西方经验的借鉴。不同之处是《再生》更注重复兴理论的建构,提出了“修正的民主政治”,而《复兴月刊》则更注重实际层面的民族复兴,即注重“建设”,与当时官方思想互动较多,并赞同强力政治、威权政治,回归到了传统贤能政治的人治模式上,可见,二者表面虽异,实质却相差不大,无论是“强力政治”还是“修正的民主政治”,都蕴含着传统政治观的印记,因而二者的民族复兴思想都有明显的向传统回归的倾向。余论部分意在对《复兴月刊》民族复兴思想的价值与意义作一评价：民族复兴运动是在民族和文化双重危机的背景下,民族主义与意识形态共谋催生的结果,《复兴月刊》提出的主张客观上适应了时代的需求,因此为建构民族国家意识形态所倚重,并获得自身发展的空间,然而其思想有着浓厚的调和折中色彩,因此其复兴方案最终是在传统文化的框架内运行,故谓“丸未出盘”。更多还原

【Abstract】 With Chinese situation changing after September18th Incident, the Revival Monthly started publication on June,1932.It served for assembling more people with lofty ideas and making them build their country and society. And it aimed to study the plan of building to be suitable with modern needs. Meanwhile, it discussed the way to national revival in terms of national conditions. So the idea of national revival is one of most important contents on the Revival Monthly. The thesis’s core was political discourses on the Revival Monthly. It studied the idea of national revival and tried to reveal the characteristic of the idea of national revival. In this way, it exhibits some aspects of the thoughts’ trend of national revival in1930s. Furthermore, it improved the research of Chinese history of modern thought and culture.This paper consists of three major parts:preface, body and conclusion. The first chapter is the preface, which explains the purpose of the thesis and retrospects the study about the thesis before. In addition, it introduces research approach and its major innovation and drawbacks. Chapter I presents a summary of "Revival Monthly" in1930s, such as its purpose, edit and publishing, author group and social impact. It provides a cognitive basis for following chapters. Chapter II expounds the starting point of national revival, which was psychological building. Psychological building was regard as the starting point of national revival, the prerequisite of material construction, the basic way of national revival on the Revival Monthly. It showed that spiritual power played an important part in national revival. In addition, the chapter points out that the thoughts of national revival on the "Revival Monthly" embodied some aspects, such as psychology, politics, economy, cultural education, which is a complete scheme of national revival. It shows that psychological building was regard as the starting point of national revival, political building as a key point, economic construction as a central task, cultural education as a main method in the scheme. In all these respects, political building was in an important position on national revival, which was regarded as the prerequisite and could solve all problems on the Revival Monthly. Chapter IV and V mainly study the interaction between the Revival Monthly and the Constitutional Movement and Fascism thoughts after the September18th Incident. They are important political contents on the Revival Monthly. Chapter VI mainly studies the Revival Monthly made its own choice for the political way which is powerful politics on the basis of adjusting ideal and reality. Chapter Ⅶ mainly compares the thoughts of nation revival on the Revival Monthly and the National Renaissance. Both of them mainly emphasized nationalism, which are results of intellectuals devoting themselves to homeland. In addition, the thoughts of national revival on them meant that Chinese intellectual constructed a modern national country with attaching to traditional culture. So some of thoughts inherited from Chinese traditional thoughts and other draw lessons from western experiences. The Revival Monthly emphasized particularly on national revival in practical aspect and agreed that powerful politics and authoritarian politics had returned to the model of meritocracy. Thus, it interacted more with official thoughts. However, the National Renaissance emphasized particularly on national revival in theoretical aspect and argued amended democracy. In fact, their arguments were very similar. Powerful politics and amended democracy contains some marks of traditional politics. So both kinds of national revivals are characteristic of conservatism. The conclusion assesses the value and significance of national revivals’thoughts on the Revival Monthly. The movement of national revival resulted from nationalism and ideology because of national and culture crisis. The Revival Monthly’s arguments were suitable for the needs of modern society. Meanwhile, those arguments were characteristic of compromise. Because not only did it try to construct the ideologies of national country, but also it wanted to develop. So the revival scheme couldn’t get rid of the trammels of traditional culture.更多还原