节点文献

科学发展观视野下资源型地区经济转型路径研究

Study on Economic Transformation Path of Resource-based Region from the Perspective of Scientific Development Concept

【作者】 王炤坤

【导师】 冯子标;

【作者基本信息】 山西财经大学 , 政治经济学, 2013, 博士

【摘要】 转型发展是当代中国最鲜明的时代特征和发展主题。资源型地区的人口、面积、地区、经济规模在我国都占有相当大的比重,资源型地区转型发展事关我国转变经济发展方式、深化经济体制改革全局,事关我国全面建成小康社会和现代化建设总体战略实现。研究资源型地区转型路径具有重要的实践意义和理论价值。论文认为,发展不平衡、不协调、不可持续构成了资源型地区发展的最大困境,以单一产业转型为核心的传统转型路径难以解决发展不平衡、不协调、不可持续问题,甚至形成了新的不平衡、不协调、不可持续问题,产生了新旧困境叠加。发展不平衡、不协调、不可持续的实践问题,在传统发展观和传统转型理论的逻辑中已经无法解决。科学发展观继承发展了马克思主义发展理论,吸收和借鉴了世界先进发展观和中华优秀文化精髓,把人本发展、全面协调可持续发展、创新发展作为理论要旨,为成功破解发展和转型中不平衡、不协调、不可持续问题提供了科学的理论指引。本文在系统分析我国资源型地区发展困境、深入剖析资源型地区传统转型路径缺陷的基础上,以政治经济学、发展经济学、转型经济学为理论基础,系统运用科学发展观的原理和方法,构建了贯彻科学发展观要求的新型转型路径,明确了“六位一体”的内容和目标,并对新型转型路径的实施和展开、新型转型的动力体系构建进行了深入系统的研究。资源型地区新型转型路径可以概括为:以科学发展观为指导,以促进人的全面发展为核心,把以人为本、绿色发展、包容共享作为转型发展价值,把全面协调、统筹兼顾、创新驱动、市场决定作为方法论,推进实施人力资本转型、经济结构转型、城乡关系转型、生态治理模式转型、公共服务体制转型、转型动力保障等“六位一体”的转型内容,以人力资本提升、现代产业体系建立、城乡(矿)一体化发展、资源环境可持续、民生福利增进、发展动力充沛为目标的转型路径。从特征和内涵上看,我国资源型地区新型转型路径,既有全国意义上转型的一般性:在生产力落后条件下由传统工业化道路向新型工业化道路转变,从社会主义计划经济体制向社会主义市场经济体制转型;又有资源型经济转型规律的特殊性,即规避或摆脱经济学上的“资源诅咒”,可以归纳为“五个转变”:实现从产业转型为核心向以人的全面发展为核心转变,从资源依赖向创新驱动转变,从资源环境约束型向资源节约环境友好型转变,从资源型城市极式发展向城、矿、区一体化发展转变,从注重经济增长向经济社会全面发展转变。本文的创新之处在于:在国内第一次提出了资源型地区经济转型的传统转型路径,从国际和国内两个视角,指出其内在的缺陷和不足,并分析其产生新旧困境叠加的深刻原因;在国内第一次提出资源型地区经济转型的新型转型路径,运用科学发展观的原理和方法,系统阐明了新型转型路径的原则、内容、目标、主体、方式、时机、阶段和评价指标体系,构建了较为完整的资源型地区新型转型理论体系;从理论上阐明了新型转型路径和传统转型路径的本质区别,在于是否把以人为本作为转型的首要原则,把促进人的全面发展作为转型的首要目标,为资源型地区人力资本转型、经济结构转型、城乡关系转型、生态治理转型、公共服务转型找到了实质精髓,明确了主攻方向。论文采用了理论研究和实证研究相结合的方法,归纳演绎和推导相结合的方法,历史研究和逻辑研究相结合的方法,定性研究和定量研究的方法,系统论和矛盾论相结合的方法,经济学与其他多学科相结合的方法。

【Abstract】 Transformation is among the most distinctive age characteristics and keydevelopment themes in contemporary China. Transformation of resource-basedeconomy is an issue with overall importance to transformation of economicdevelopment pattern and deepening of economic reform. It is also necessary to achievetarget of overall strategy which build a well-off society in an all-round way andmodernization program. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to study thetransformation path of resource-based economy.We find that it is the biggest dilemma of resource-based region that the unbalanced,uncoordinated and unsustainable development. it is difficult to solve by single industrialrestructuring at the core, and even resulting in the new unbalanced, uncoordinated andunsustainable problems that bring about a superposition of old dilemma. With thedevelopment of unbalanced, uncoordinated and unsustainable practice problems, it hasbeen unable to resolve by the traditional development view and transformation theory.The scientific concept of development, a new contribution to Marxist theory, absorbingthe world’s most advanced development view and the essence of Chinese traditionalculture, promoting people-centered, comprehensive, coordinated and sustainabledevelopment, provides a scientific theory to solve the unbalance, uncoordinated andunsustainable issues.According to systematic analysis on development predicament of resource-basedeconomy and in-depth study on defects of traditional transition path, based on PoliticalEconomy, development economics and transition economics theory, this papersystematically applies the principles and methods of scientific development concept andconstructs a new transformation path which conforms to the principle and essence ofpeople-oriented policy, green development, inclusive and sharing society,comprehensive coordination, holistic balance, innovation drived development and adecisive role for the market in resource allocation. The author precisely defines thecontent and goals of this six-in-one transformation, and systematically explores itsimplement, operation, and dynamic mechanism.The new transition path to resource-based regions can be summarized as: on theguidance of scientific development concept, to promote the comprehensivedevelopment of people as the core, to take people-oriented policy, green development, inclusive and sharing as the transitional development issue, to consider thecomprehensive coordination, all-round consideration, innovation-driven andmarket-determined as the methodology, promotes this six-in-one transformation whichinclude the human capital transition, economic restructuring, the transitionalrelationship between urban and rural areas, the transitional ecological improvementpattern, the transitional public services system, and the transitional power support. Ourgoal of the development transition path is to boost human capital, establish a modernindustrial system, achieve integrated development of urban and rural (mining) area,enhance the livelihood and welfare, obtain plenty of transitional power.Our national new transition path of resource-based regions is the universality ofnational transition including all of its features and content,i.e., from the traditionalindustrialization path to the new industrialization road under the conditions of backwardproductivity forces and from socialist planned economy to socialist market economicsystem; the particularity of resource-based transition, i.e. to avoid or get rid of the"resource curse " in economics, which can be induced to "Five changes": from industrialstructure adjustment to man’s all-round development, form resource dependence toinnovation driving, form constraints to friendly in resource and environment, fromextreme development to integrated development in resource-oriented cities, fromrelying on economic growth to society developing in an all-round way.The innovation of this paper lies in: it first studies traditional transformation pathof resource-based region’s economy in China, from both international and domesticperspective, and reveals the profound reasons for overlay of the old and newtransformation predicament. The author proposes the concept of new transformationpath of resource-based region’s economy which applies the principle and methods ofscientific development and clarifies its principle, content, goal, subjective, patterns,timing, means and evaluating indicator system to build a complete theoretical system.The author illustrates that the essential difference between traditional and newtransformation path is whether to regard all-round development of people as the firstprinciple and to make people’s comprehensive development as primary goal. This alsoprovide the core and direction for transformation of human resource, economic structure,urban-rural-relation, ecological control and public service.In this paper, we proceed from theory to empirical work, deductive-inductiveapproaches, unifying history and logic of method, qualitative and quantitative research, combined contradiction theory and systems theory, integrating the economics and othermulti-disciplinary method.

节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络