【作者】 胡晓岚；

【导师】 易英；

【作者基本信息】 中央美术学院 ， 美术学， 2014， 博士

【摘要】 本文是关于文化史家约翰·赫伊津哈的个案研究。赫氏是西方20世纪史学泰斗，目前国内学界有关赫氏著作的研究一方面有待深入展开，另一方面某些问题需要进一步澄清。笔者亲赴赫氏曾执教多年的荷兰莱顿大学，在赫氏唯一评传作者奥特尔斯佩尔教授帮助下有幸得到相关珍贵资料。本文首先对赫氏生平、史学观进行总体介绍，接着将论述扩展到赫氏的学术语境、多样化著作和著作的相互关系，以及学界对赫氏著作的接受情况，进而通过对赫氏著作的中英文资料进行对比，发现问题、辨伪存真，试图向更为真实、全面的赫伊津哈进一步接近。与美术史研究的密切关联是赫氏文化史研究的一大特色。在美术史研究日益受到交叉学科的影响下，本文尝试从美术史研究方法的角度对赫氏著作进一步探索。首先对赫氏的治史方法进行分析、归纳和总结，接着从文化史看美术史，探寻艺术在赫氏著作中占有的地位和发挥的作用，并拓展至图像证史问题的讨论。最后的章节回到本文的核心，反观赫氏文化史给美术史研究带来的启发，寻找赫氏之所以能够在关键美术史问题的认识上有所突破的原因。对观念-心态的洞察和把握；通过比较研究寻找特定历史时期文化形式的共振与差异；从艺术的文化关系入手重建艺术品所在的可见与不可见的语境与氛围，形成了赫氏美术史研究方法的主要方面。最后，由于中世纪和文艺复兴既是美术史研究也是赫氏文化史研究的关键问题，通过将赫氏与布克哈特等史学大家的研究成果进行比较，在立体展现赫氏研究的同时突出赫氏研究的价值。更多还原

【Abstract】 This thesis is the case study of works by Johan Huizinga.As the leading figure in cultural historical study in the20thcentury, more researcheson Johan Huizinga s works need to be done and more misunderstandings need to beclarified in China. I had been to Leiden University where Johan Huizinga had taught formany years. With the help of professor Willem Otterspeer, the author of the only criticalbiography of Johan Huizinga, I had luckily got many valuable reading materials. To beginwith, this thesis focuses on Huizinga s life and his view on history in general, and thenintroduces the academic context of Huizinga, his works and the inner-relationship of theworks and the receptions of works by Huizinga in different countries. By contrasting theEnglish version and Chinese version of Huizinga s works, problems have been detectedand clarifications have been made, trying to come closer to the better understanding ofHuizinga s works.The close relationship with art history is one of the features of Huizinga s study ofcultural history. Influenced by the trend of multidisciplinary studies in art history, thisthesis tries to explore Huizinga s works from the perspective of the methodology of arthistory. Firstly, to analyze and summarize Huizinga s methods of historical research, toexplore the role played by fine arts in works by Huizinga from the perspective of culturalhistory and then to discuss the problem of the uses of images as historical evidence in abroader sense.The last part of the thesis goes back to the key issue, that is, to reflect on theinspirations drawn from the research of cultural history by Huizinga from the perspectiveof art historical research, looking for the reasons why Huizinga was able to makebreakthroughs in important issues of art history. The insight into and the grasp of theessence of idea and mentality of an age, the contrast and comparison of different culturalforms of an certain age, the rebuilding of context and atmosphere from the culturalrelationships of art, those form the main aspects of Huizinga s methods in the research ofart history. Finally, for the Middle Ages and the Renaissance have been the key topics inboth researches of art history and Huizinga s cultural history, the researches by Huizinga isshown in another dimension and the value of his research is highlighted by comparing theworks by Huizinga with the ones by Burkhardt and other historians.更多还原