【作者】 侯凤英；

【导师】 张俊芳；

【作者基本信息】 大连海事大学 ， 马克思主义中国化研究， 2013， 博士

【摘要】 21世纪初,我国开始导入西方国家的政绩评价理论,进行试点实践,并取得了初步成效。但同时也出现了许多问题,如“重显轻隐”的政绩面子工程问题,“重上轻下”的邀功政绩问题,“重硬轻软”的数字造假问题,注水政绩更是公开的秘密。这些问题降低了政府的公信力,疏离了党群关系,败坏了社会风气。上述问题产生原因是多方面的,但直接原因是政绩评价体系不科学,如政绩评价主体设置主要为单一的内部评价主体,评价标准重经济量的指标,轻经济质量以及文化社会指标,评价结果主要用于少部分人的奖励,而没有用于改进政府工作。解决政绩评价体系所存在的问题,是十分困难而又复杂的问题,也是引起众多学者关注的问题。但目前还没有学者从价值哲学视域对政绩评价进行哲学层面的概括和研究。论文正是以此为切入点,从价值哲学的视角,对政绩评价的相关概念及其本质进行价值哲学界定,从哲学层面上分析了政绩评价的基本体系构成,总结了我国政绩评价的实践及其存在问题,提出了政绩评价体系完善思路。该论文由五部分构成：第一部分,绪论。概述了政绩评价问题的研究原因及研究意义,梳理了国内外关于政绩评价问题的研究现状,指出了本文研究的基本思路和论文基本框架。第二部分,政绩评价相关概念界定及理论依据。以价值哲学为视域：首先,对政绩、政绩观、政绩评价进行了界定；然后,道明本研究的相关理论基础：价值哲学的价值本质理论、马克思主义哲学价值评价理论、马克思公平观民主观及权力制约理论、新公共行政管理理论。第三部分,政绩评价基本体系构成。依据价值评价的构成要素,提出并阐明了政绩评价体系的四大构成要素：政绩评价主体、政绩评价客体、政绩评价标准、政绩评价结果。并分别对四大要素进行了价值哲学的界定,划分了政绩评价主体的类别、政绩评价主体设置的原则。在此基础上,重点对政绩评价标准进行了深刻剖析,概括了政绩评价标准所具有的科学性与矛盾性的特点；阐明了政绩评价标准的价值取向；揭示了政绩评价结果的制约因素及导向功能。第四部分,我国政绩评价的实践及其存在问题。依据政绩评价体系的基本构成,全面阐明了政绩评价主体设置、政绩评价标准制定、政绩评价结果运用这三方面的实践进展；着重找寻出主体设置、标准制定、结果运用等方面在实践中存在的主要问题,旨在为政绩评价体系的完善思路提供依据。第五部分,政绩评价体系完善思路。针对我国政绩评价实践中存在的问题,提出并系统阐明了：政绩评价主体体系完善思路,即确立公民评价主体地位、发展专业评价主体组织、发展多元评价主体体系；政绩评价标准完善思路,即确立政绩评价标准客观依据、遵循政绩评价标准科学化的价值原则、确立政绩评价标准的五大价值维度；政绩评价结果运用思路,即构建评价结果反馈机制、建立评价结果信息公开机制和监管机制、健全行政问责制度。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the early21st century, China began to introduce government performance evaluation theory in western countries, conducted a pilot and has made initial achievement. But there has also been a lot of problems, such as "the government performance face-saving projects" problems, in which the "important" ones are exhibited while the "unimportant" ones are hidden, claiming the credit for performance issues like "Heavy on the light down","Hard up while soft down" figure counterfeiting problems, water injection government performance has become an open secret, Superiors acting and inferiors imitating, the atmosphere of counterfeiting spreads in the society, which seriously damages the social atmosphere and undermines the government’s credibility. This dissertation attributes the problems that arose in the evaluation the government performance mainly to the lack of depth in the awareness on the issues like "Who evaluates?","What to evaluate?","Why to evaluate?" on current domestic performance evaluation study. Based on this, this dissertation redefines the relevant concepts and its nature of government performance evaluation from the perspective of value philosophy, analyses the basic system formation of performance evaluation, summarizes the practice and the existing problems of performance evaluation in China, proposes the constructive approaches of performance evaluation.This dissertation is made up of the following five parts:The first part is the Introduction, which outlines the causes and significance of the study of performance evaluation from the perspective of value philosophy, cards the research progress of performance evaluation at home and abroad, points out the basic approaches and theoretical framework of this dissertation.The second part defines the relevant concepts and theoretical basis of performance evaluation, redefining performance, outlook of performance, performance evaluation from the perspective of value philosophy, points out the theoretical basis of this study is value philosophy, including the theory of value essence, the relevant Marxist theories and the relevant theories of administrative management.The third part, a profound analysis of the basic systematic formation of performance evaluation. In accordance with the value evaluation, the basic system of performance evaluation contains performance subject, performance object, performance evaluation criteria, and performance evaluation results. Performance evaluation subject and performance object are defined from the perspective of value philosophy, the main categories of performance evaluation are divided and the principles of performance evaluation are set. Performance evaluation criteria are deeply analyzed, points out that performance evaluation criteria is the scale in the process of the performance evaluation subject’s evaluating on the performance evaluation object, is the performance evaluation index system manifested in the form of ideology, This determination, in essence, has no less reliability and objectivity than the criteria to identify knowledge and cognitive science. The inherent contradiction in performance evaluation criteria is also pointed out, so there is great difficulty in making scientific performance evaluation criteria system, which must have the support of correct value orientation. Finally, the performance evaluation subject and performance evaluation criteria will affect the performance evaluation results, and performance evaluation results are not the ultimate goal of the performance evaluation, the ultimate goal of the evaluation of the government performance is to have a positive role in guiding the government’s work.The fourth part is the practices and existing problems in the performance evaluation in China. This dissertation thoroughly summarizes and analyses the practical progress in the following aspects:the setting of the performance evaluation, the performance evaluation criteria formulation, the performance evaluation results utilization in accordance with the basic structure of performance evaluation system, and tries to identify the main problems in the practices of subjects setting, criteria formulation and results utilization, aims at providing a basis for the ideas of the construction of performance evaluation system.The fifth part is the ideas of the construction of performance evaluation system. Focusing on the existing problems in the practices of performance evaluation in China, in accordance with the logic thread of Who evaluates?(the performance evaluation subject)—What to evaluate(evaluation criteria)--Why to evaluate?(evaluation results utilization),this dissertation first proposes suggestions for the settings of the performance evaluation subjects, and believes that the settings of the performance evaluation subjects should follow the principle of performance evaluation subject is consistent with the performance subject and should strengthen the role of citizen evaluation subject, develop professional evaluation organization subject by following the principle of evaluation subject specialization, develop diversified evaluation subjects system by following the principle of different subjects with a reasonable proportion. Secondly, the ideas of the setting of the performance evaluation criteria are discussed. An in-depth analysis of objective basis for performance evaluation criteria must be done in order to achieve a scientific performance evaluation criteria. The objective basis for the setting of performance evaluation criteria cannot do without performance subject need. Performance subject need has two different aspects:the inner desire of the subject and the actual existence of dependency between subject and object, whose nature has the clear difference between legitimacy and illegitimacy. The legitimate need of the performance evaluation subject is an objective basis for performance evaluation criteria, but also the basis for realizing a scientific value principle of performance evaluation criteria. Following the principle of the objective basis for performance evaluation criteria and principle of realizing scientific performance evaluation, this dissertation proposes that the basic framework system of performance evaluation criteria should cover five value dimensions, which are political, economic, cultural, social and environmental, focusing on analysing the reasons why the performance evaluation criteria should cover cultural value dimension and the constructive ideas on cultural index system. Finally, the purposes of the performance evaluation are analysed, the basic ideas of the performance evaluation results utilization are proposed, namely the establishment of evaluation results feedback mechanism, the establishment of the evaluation results information disclosure and oversight mechanism, the establishment of sound administrative accountability system.更多还原