【作者】 张军；

【导师】 万兴亚；

【作者基本信息】 东北师范大学 ， 马克思主义基本原理， 2013， 博士

【摘要】 城乡一体化,是我国在推进工业化、城镇化、现代化进程中必须融入的一个战略过程。推进这一过程,必须基于国情通过制度创新破除现有的城乡二元体制；推进这一过程,就是通过制度创新把城乡发展作为一个有机整体,实现城乡在经济、政治、文化、社会和生态等诸多方面的协同发展。长期以来,我国城乡发展失衡、差距大,城乡关系不协调；究其根本原因在于“户籍制度”及相关制度安排使然。要实现真正的城乡融合,即实现城乡一体化,须要进一步深化改革,尤其须要制度创新。本文以《推进我国城乡一体化的制度创新研究》为题,以统筹城乡发展为主线,以破解其制度障碍为重点,探求构建城乡一体化制度创新的框架体系及对策。本文主体部分由六章内容所构成：第一章内容是“城乡一体化制度创新的依据及相关理论阐释”。在这一部分,首先对城乡一体化制度创新概念进行了界定,在此基础上,提出并论述了城乡一体化制度创新的理论依据；其次分析和阐释了国内外关于城乡一体化制度创新的相关理论,主要包括马克思主义经典作家的相关理论、中国共产党几代领导集体的相关理论以及国内外学者的相关论述。第二章内容是“我国城乡一体化改革的制度分析”。这一部分梳理了我国改革开放以来城乡一体化制度变迁的历史演进过程；重点对我国城乡一体化改革的现行制度和制度困境进行了理论剖析：首先对我国城乡一体化改革试点工作中的制度经验进行了总结,其次从制度障碍、制度缺失和制度改革滞后等三层面分析了我国城乡一体化改革面临的制度困境。第三章内容是“发达国家城乡一体化制度经验及其对我国的启示”。通过对几个发达国家城乡一体化理论和实践模式进行分析,总结其主要制度经验,重点论述了对我国推进城乡一体化改革及制度创新的启示。第四章内容是“推进城乡一体化制度创新的影响因素及评价指标”。首先从非制度因素、现行制度的完善程度、城乡一体化对新制度的需求三个方面分析了推进城乡一体化制度创新的影响因素；其次提出了城乡一体化制度创新评价指标的设计原则,即从城乡经济发展的融合度、城乡社会发展的融合度、城乡生活发展的融合度、城乡人口发展的融合度、城乡可持续发展的融合度五个方面,对城乡一体化制度创新进行了量化指标设计。第五章内容是“推进我国城乡一体化制度创新的原则、思路与框架”。其一,提出了推进我国城乡一体化应本着客观性、公正性、均衡性、民本主义和向农村倾斜的制度创新原则；其二,探讨了推进我国城乡一体化制度创新的总体思路,包括目标、指导方针和路径选择三个方面；其三,从城乡产业发展、劳动就业等七个方面提出推进我国城乡一体化制度创新的基本框架即内容。第六章内容是“推进我国城乡一体化制度创新的对策建议”。本章提出：一是推进城乡一体化制度创新的基点,是打破城乡二元社会结构；二是推进城乡一体化制度创新的核心,是解决“三农”问题、缩小城乡差距,以改善民生；三是推进城乡一体化制度创新的保障,是完善政策体系,加强法律建设,转变政府职能。更多还原

【Abstract】 Urban-rural integration is a strategic procedure that must be built into the process of promoting industrialization, urbanization and modernization, which must break the existing urban-rural dual structure based on our national condition, and should regard the urban and rural development as an organic whole through the institutional innovation to realize the collaborative development of urban and rural areas in the economic, political, cultural, social and ecological aspects, etc..There have been imbalanced development, large gap and inharmonious relationship between city and countryside for a long time, the fundamental reason for which lies in’the household registration system’and related institutional arrangements. The achievement of the real amalgamation of city and countryside, namely realization of the integration of urban and rural areas, requires a further reform, especially the institutional innovation.With the title Research on Institutional Innovation for Promoting China’s Urban-rural Integration, this dissertation explores the institutional innovation framework of city-country integration and its countermeasures, focusing on the coordination of rural and urban development and the breaking of institutional barriers.The dissertation includes a brief introduction and six chapters.Chapter One is devoted to the relevant theoretical overview of the institutional innovation of urban-rural integration. In this chapter, it firstly makes definition for institutional innovation of urban-rural integration, on the basis of which the theory of institutional innovation is proposed and discussed. Secondly, it conducts analysis and interpretation on relevant theories of the urban-rural integration institutional innovation at home and abroad, including relevant theories from Marxist classical writers and from generations of leaders of the Communist Party of China, and related discussion of scholars throughout the world.Chapter Two focuses on’institutional analysis of urban-rural integration reform’. This part scrutinizes historical evolution process of urban-rural integration institutional change since the reforms and open-door policy in1980’s, giving priority to the theoretical analysis on current institution and predicament in the process of urban-rural integration reform, firstly summarizing the experience in pilot reform of urban-rural integration, and secondly analyzing the current institutional predicament in urban-rural integration reform from the perspective of the institutional improvement, the institutional shortage, and the lag of institution reform.Chapter Three talks about’experience of urban-rural integration institution in developed countries and inspiration for China". Through the analysis on theories of urban-rural integration and practice patterns in several developed countries, and the experience summarization, it elaborates on the inspiration for urban-rural integration institution reform and institutional innovation in China.Chapter Four presents’modifying factor and evaluation indicator in promoting urban-rural integration institutional innovation’. First of all, it makes analysis on modifying factors in promoting urban-rural integration institutional innovation from non-institutional factors, perfection degree of the current institution, and the demand for new institution; secondly it proposes designing principles of new evaluation indicators for urban-rural integration institutional innovation, with quantitatively indicator design for urban-rural integration institutional innovation from the amalgamation degree of economic, social, population and sustainable development of city and countryside.Chapter Five deals with’general principle, idea and framework for promoting urban-rural integration institutional innovation’. Firstly, it advances that promoting the urban-rural integration should be based on objectivity, fairness, proportionality, people-oriented doctrines and institutional innovation bias to the countryside; secondly, it discusses the general idea on promoting urban-rural integration institutional innovation, including targeting, guidelines and routing; thirdly, it proposes the framework for promoting urban-rural integration institutional innovation from seven directions, such as the development of urban and rural industry and employment, etc..The last chapter gives an analysis of’suggestions on promoting urban-rural integration institutional innovation in China’. It puts forward that, firstly, the basis of promoting urban-rural integration institutional innovation is to break the binary social structure of city and country; secondly, the key to institutional innovation is to address the problems facing China’s agriculture, rural areas and farmers and to narrow down the urban-rural gap, which will ultimately improve people’s livelihood; thirdly, the guarantee for institutional innovation is to complete policies, strengthen legal system construction, and deepen government reform.更多还原