【作者】 谢湘辉；

【导师】 肖永平；

【作者基本信息】 武汉大学 ， 国际法学， 2013， 博士

【摘要】 知识产权权利冲突是知识产权民事纠纷的主要类型,且具有普遍性。解决好知识产权权利冲突就能很好地化解知识产权民事纠纷,维护权利人的合法权利和社会公共利益。本文旨在通过对知识产权权利冲突的成因和本质进行分析,发现保护在先权利原则的合理性,从而为完善以保护在先权利原则为主的知识产权权利冲突司法解决机制提供法理依据。同时,本文通过对国内外有关在先权利立法比较研究,提出完善我国在先权利立法的一些建议。并且,本文还通过对大量知识产权权利冲突典型案例的分析,得出保护在先权利是解决知识产权权利冲突的最基本原则,其他原则作为补充。最后在此基础上,笔者就知识产权权利冲突的立法解决机制和司法解决机制的完善提出自己的建议。第一章知识产权权利冲突成因论。本章主要讨论知识产权权利冲突产生的原因,以期从历史的、文化的、经济的,以及法哲学层面揭示知识产权权利冲突产生的复杂历史背景和现实原因。本章分为四部分,第一节主要论述知识产权冲突产生的社会历史背景。从知识产权发展历史的角度,论述知识产权冲突是由于经济的发展、社会的进步、人们知识经济意识的觉醒、知识产权法律文化的兴起等社会历史原因综合作用的结果。第二节从分析知识产权权利冲突的构成要件开始,找出本文认可的知识产权权利冲突的概念。第三节主要归纳了知识产权权利冲突产生的原因。本文用归纳总结的手法,从知识产权权利主体、权利客体、权利内容、法律制度四个方面分析了知识产权权利冲突发生的主要原因,为下文研究知识产权权利冲突本质打下基础。第二章知识产权权利冲突本质论。本章从论证知识产权权利冲突是否是一个伪命题开始,然后通过法理分析和事实论证,找出知识产权权利冲突的本质,并且根据相关标准对于知识产权权利冲突进行分类,为本文研究知识产权权利冲突的司法解决机制做好铺垫。本章分为三节,第一节主要论述知识产权的本质。笔者先分析了知识产权是个伪命题观点,指出其错误所在,然后归纳知识产权权利冲突的本质,不仅是利益的冲突,更是价值的冲突。第二节讨论了知识产权权利冲突的社会影响,既有消极的负面影响,也有积极的正面影响。第三节为了本文实证研究的便利,对知识产权权利冲突进行了合理分类。第三章关于知识产权权利冲突中的在先权利。本章通过对知识产权在先权利概念及构成要件的分析,确立正确的在先权利的概念及范围。同时,借鉴国际条约和外国关于在先权利的立法,指出我国在先权利立法的不足之处。本章分三节,第一节论述知识产权中在先权利的概念及特征,分析了我国知识产权在先权利概念产生的背景、学理上的分歧；第二节论述知识产权在先权利的范围,借鉴国外对于在先权利立法的规定,指出我国在先权利立法的不足,建议完善在先权利范围的立法；第三节论述知识产权在先权利的法律效力,对比国际条约及外国立法关于在先权利法律效力的规定,对照我国的相关规定,指出我国在先权利立法的特点和其它不足之处,为本文保护在先权利原则的提出夯实法律基础。第四章关于保护在先权利原则。本章主要讨论我国保护在先权利原则的提出、法理依据,以及与国外保护在先权利原则的立法比较。本章分三节,本章第一节论述保护在先权利原则作为知识产权权利冲突解决的基本原则的提出,以及其法理依据；第二节介绍国外及国际条约关于保护在先权利的立法,分析其具体值得借鉴之处；第三节分析我国知识产权立法中保护在先权利原则规定,对比外国立法,发现不同及不足之处。第五章知识产权权利冲突解决论之司法实践。本章主要论述保护在先权利原则在解决知识产权权利冲突司法实践中的作用,通过分析保护在先权利原则在解决权利冲突典型案件中的司法适用,发现保护在先权利原则在解决权利冲突中的重要性和现实意义。从另一方面,也通过知识产权权利冲突典型案例的分析,发现运用保护在先权利原则解决权利冲突的局限性,为下文探讨完善我国知识产权权利冲突解决机制获取素材。本章分三节,第一节以商标权为中心,通过对商标权与在先权利冲突典型案例中的分析,论述保护在先权利原则在商标权与在先权利冲突领域的作用和存在的问题。第二节以专利权为中心,通过对专利权与在先权利冲突典型案例的分析,论述保护在先权利原则在专利权与在先权利冲突领域的作用和存在的问题。第三节以著作权和其他知识产权为中心,通过对著作权及其它知识产权与在先权利冲突典型案例的分析,论述保护在先权利原则在著作权及其它知识产权与在先权利冲突领域的作用和存在的问题。第六章知识产权权利冲突解决论之制度完善。本章在前文分析论证的基础上,对于在知识产权权利冲突中适用保护在先权利原则做全面总结,归纳司法实践中保护在先权利原则的作用和不足,提出解决知识产权权利冲突的衡平原则和其他补充原则,使知识产权权利冲突的司法解决机制更加完善。同时,在保护在先权利解决知识产权权利冲突立法方面,本文借鉴外国相关保护在先权利立法,建议改进我国在先权利立法,完善我国知识产权权利冲突的立法解决机制。本章分为两节,第一节从知识产权权利冲突纠纷司法解决的角度,全面归纳保护在先权利原则在解决权利冲突纠纷司法实践中的作用、地位和不足,并提出其他解决权利冲突的原则,作为保护在先权利原则的补充。最后根据国内司法实践经验,提出完善我国知识产权权利冲突司法解决机制的建议。第二节从知识产权权利冲突立法解决的角度,在尊重国际条约规定的前提下,借鉴外国保护在先权利立法的经验,提出完善我国知识产权权利冲突立法解决机制的建议。纵观全文,前两章主要论述知识产权权利冲突的成因和本质,其后两章主要论述在先权利的国际国内立法比较,以及保护在先权利原则的法理和现实基础。最后两章从司法实践的角度通过实证的方式来论述保护在先权利原则的地位和重要性,以及提出完善知识产权权利冲突解决机制的立法和司法建议。全文秉承从理论到实践,再从实践到司法、立法建议的研究进路,希望该研究对于完善我国知识产权权利冲突解决机制有所裨益。更多还原

【Abstract】 The conflict of intellectual property rights (" IPR conflict") is the main category of IPR disputes, and is commonly arising. Only the IPR conflict is properly resolved both the legislative interests of the parties and the public interests are fairly protected. The dissertation is devoted to provide the jurisprudence basis for perfecting the IPR conflict resolution mechanism, by way of analyzing the causes and essence of IPR conflict and find out the rationality of application of prior right protection rule. As well the dissertation makes some suggestion on improving the legislation on IPR prior rights, by way of comparatively analyzing the relevant legislation of foreign countries. The dissertation makes its effort to conclude that IPR prior right protection rule is the most essential one of those rules of the IPR conflict resolution after doing abundant case study over the IPR conflict cases. The dissertation finally advises on improving the judicial resolution mechanism and legislature resolution mechanism on IPR conflict.Chapter One is on the causes of IPR conflict. This chapter mainly aims to find out the complicated causes of IPR conflict with the angles of IPR’s history, economy, culture and jurisprudence. The chapter is composed of four parts, Part one states and analyses the social background of IPR conflict’s emerging. Part two introduces the concept of IPR conflict and constituent elements of IPR conflict. Part three makes a conclusion on the main causes of IPR conflict.Chapter Two is on the essence of IPR conflict. Started with debating on the false or true proposition of IPR conflict, this chapter tries to find out the essence of IPR conflict from the angles of jurisprudence and practice. As well it categorizes those IPR conflicts with the selected criteria. This chapter has three parts. Part one is on the essence of IPR conflict, which is concluded as the conflict of interests, as well as the conflict of values. Part two discusses the social impact of IPR conflict, including the positive impact and negative impact. Part three makes categorization of IPR conflicts with the selected criteria.Chapter three is on the prior right in IPR conflicts. This chapter finds out the right concept of prior right and its contents through analysing those different concepts on prior right. As well this chapter tells the defects of Chinese legislation on prior right based on the comparative study of relevant legislations of foreign countries. This chapter has three parts. Part one discusses the concept and attributes of prior right, and introduces the initial adoption of prior right in China’s legislation and theoretically disagreement on the concept. Part two states the contents of prior right of IPR. Based on the comparative study of relevant legislation of foreign countries, the defects of China’s legislation are detected and improvement is accordingly advised. Part three concludes the legislative force of prior right of IPR. Compared with the relevant legislation of foreign countries, China’s legislation on prior right protection has its features and as well its shortcomings.Chapter four is on prior right protection rule. This chapter introduces the adoption of IPR prior right protection rule and it jurisprudent resources, and also does comparative study of foreign countries’ legislation on the said rule. This chapter is composed of three parts. Part one discusses the adoption of the prior right protection rule as the essential rule and its jurisprudent resources. Part two introduces the relevant clauses of International conventions and foreign countries’ legislation on IPR prior right protection. Part three analyses the Chinese legislation on the prior right protection and finds out its imperfection.Chapter five is on the judicial practices of IPR conflict resolution with application of prior right protection rule. This chapter mainly concerns the application of prior right protection rule in IPR conflict cases. It is concluded that the prior right protection rule is of importance and practice in those IPR conflict disputes, as well the limitation of applying the prior right protection rule. This chapter has three parts. Part one is the case study on those IPR conflicts against trademark. Part two is the case study on those IPR conflicts against design patent. Part three is the case study on those IPR conflicts against copyright and other IPR.Chapter six is on the improvement of judicial and legislature mechanism of the resolution of IPR conflict. On one hand it concludes that the application of prior right protection rule is most effective in the judicial solution of IPR conflicts and due to the shortcoming of the rule, it recommends some supplementary rules on the resolution of IPR conflicts, such as the rule of equity, the rule of fair competition and the rule of rank of rights. On the other hand, it introduces the foreign countries’legislation on the IPR prior right and makes suggestion on perfecting China’s legislation on IPR conflict resolution. This chapter is divided into two parts. Part one, from the perspective of judicial resolution of IPR conflicts, comprehensively concludes the effect of application of prior right protection rule and its defects, and makes suggestion on perfecting the judicial resolution on IPR conflicts. Part two, from the perspective of legislation on resolution of PR conflicts, learning from the foreign countries’ legislation and complying with the international conventions, it proposes the improvement of China’s legislation on the resolution of IPR conflicts.In general, the first two chapters are on the causes and essence of IPR conflict, and the following two chapters mainly introduce the international convention and the legislation of foreign countries on IPR prior rights, last two chapters state the significance of applying prior right protection rule and the suggestion on the improvement of our judicial mechanism and legislature mechanism on IPR conflict resolution. Following the routine from theory to practice and then from the practice to suggestion on legislation and judicial resolution of IPR conflicts, the dissertation is devoted to benefit the improvement of China’s IPR conflict resolution mechanism.更多还原