【作者】 沈克非；

【导师】 付子堂；

【作者基本信息】 西南政法大学 ， 法学理论， 2012， 博士

【摘要】 司法制度是国家政治制度的重要组成部分,社会管理则属现阶段政府工作的重要内容。如果从政治性的视角审查社会管理需求与司法,能够发现两者在功能与目的性上有着很大程度的重合,这为司法与社会管理间的关联提供了可能；与此同时,司法凭借其独有的较高理性化程度和专业技能,应在这种参与中发挥推进制度构建与引导社会价值导向的作用；最后,司法对社会管理的参与,要实现保障社会自身力量的成长,实现司法从“参与”社会管理转化为“协助”社会力量成长的价值目标,最终实现司法与社会管理从参与到分离的转向。本文以司法与社会管理为研究对象,凭借对K市中级人民法院的样本观察,运用实证分析的方法对司法自身的实际运行状况和司法与社会管理间关系进行剖析,分析论证了司法参与社会管理的价值目标及两者间应然的关系走向。本文的基本立场为：理想状态的司法应以保守的中立姿态通过裁判实现社会公平正义；即便在现阶段的社会发展情况与制度背景下,司法也应以秩序维系与社会稳定发展为阶段性目标,真正确立起司法的公信力,树立起司法的权威。司法现阶段的参与,应为未来在社会管理上的后退做准备,要实现从“参与”到“分离”的转向。全文结构分为引论、正文五个章节和尾论。通篇论述围绕司法与社会管理展开,结合K市中级人民法院的样本,从实践角度对司法与社会管理的关联进行了分析,从价值追求角度提出了司法参与社会管理的模式选择和最终的价值取向。引言主要梳理了和司法与社会管理这一组概念相关的学术研究成果,对本文的研究对象、研究方法和研究架构做出了说明。第一章,从对分析样本的描述入手,对当前司法机关的职权配置方式做出了说明,并依据社会管理的七大基本任务,结合司法裁判能够发挥的社会效果,分析了司法参与社会管理的关联基础,基本确立了由关联基础、价值导向性与价值追求三部分构成,渐次推进的司法与社会管理的关系结构。第二章,结合对K市中级人民法院样本的考察,进一步对司法与社会管理间的关联基础进行了实证分析,并针对司法参与社会管理过程中存在的问题进行了例举。本文将司法与社会管理的关联基础划分为维护和保障公共秩序、维护和保障经济秩序、化解和协调社会矛盾、影响和控制社会关系、影响和推进制度变迁等五个方面,并分别结合K市中院历年来的相关判例及通过裁判取得的社会效果进行了分析,通过对司法实际运行状况的观察,指出了这种关联对于两者的影响。第三章,作为对司法与社会管理的进一步理论提升,针对上述的影响从对社会现实的认识角度入手,分析这种参与应然的目标,通过解析社会的心理倾向和对司法的现实需求论述了目标的阐发基础；通过对K市中级人民法院样本的考察,从制度层面探讨了司法对于制度运行和完善的推进作用,同时结合广东省高级人民法院颁发并由K市法院贯彻执行的关于刑事、民事审判领域指导意见的说明,从社会公平正义角度对于司法的公平追求进行了审视,并指出了司法与社会管理关联关系的构建应以法治为主导模式。第四章,主要论述司法与社会管理间关系最为核心的内容,即司法参与社会管理的应然价值导向,结合对K市中级人民法院样本的分析,完成了对司法参与社会管理应然价值导向的确立及相关问题的说明。本章通过论述国家管理能力的不足确立了社会自我管理的必然性；通过结合道路交通规划的实例进行分析,从实践角度提出了司法在对社会进行引导时应当关注的问题和应当坚守的伦理底线。第五章,依托对K市中级人民法院样本的分析及对K市市民社会力量成长的描述,从实践出发对司法与社会间的联系进行解读。通过对K市中院试行的案例指导制度与量刑规范化制度的分析,提出了对司法行为规范化的参照方案；通过对K市中院试行的审判绩效评估制度的分析,提出了对司法社会影响与社会效果的定量分析方案。这些措施都在一定程度上促进了司法与社会间互信,促进了司法自身能力的提升。通过K市市民社会力量的描述,从侧面说明了司法协助社会力量成长的必要性。至此本文基本完成了对司法与社会管理的描述性分析,并针对当前存在的主要问题提供了现实的解决方案。尾论部分,结合司法有限性与司法能动的论述,进一步阐述了司法当前参与社会管理所应追求的价值目标,即协助市民社会自身的成长,强调司法要由“社会管理”逐步转向“社会协助”。通过天平的比喻,对司法在国家与社会关系中的角色定位进行了剖析,同时也对司法当前参与社会管理的价值目标进行了界定,确立了司法未来的发展走向。藉由以上各章分析所展示出的司法与社会管理的关系,提出了司法与社会管理这两者关联关系的走向,即对于社会管理而言,司法应最终离场。从社会现实角度表达了对于当前制度设置方式的理解,同时也指出司法参与社会管理并非司法的长远追求,指出了未来司法与社会管理间关系应当的转向,提出了在社会管理领域应当实现的国退民进的目标,指出司法与社会管理间的关联关系必将随着社会力量的成长将最终走向分离。更多还原

【Abstract】 Administration of Justice is the main component of state’s political system. In the same time, Social Management is the general plan of state ruling in transformation period. If we consider the needs of Social Management and Administration of Justice from the perspective of Politics, we could find many similarities, which provide the possibility of setting up the connection between Social Management and Administration of Justice. In the meantime, this connection could give impetus to societal construction and lead the societal value orientation depending on Judicial specialization and Judicial rationalization. Base on the strengthen of Civil Society, it should change its goal from management to assistance after achieved a mature civil society.This thesis sets the connection between Administration of Justice and Social Management as the research object, and selects the K City Intermediate People’s Court as samples, using the empirical analysis method, to analyze the Administration of Justice’s actual situation and the function of Social Management, on this basis, proves its value goal.This thesis’s basic position could be expressed below:Judicature should judge cases conservatively and neutrally in order to achieving justice. But at the present stage of society, Judicature should take social stability as the temporary goal to realizing the public credibility of Judicature, it should realize the social guidance through Administration of Justice. At the present stage, Judicature takes part in Social Management actively is actually in preparation for withdrawing from the field of Social Management.The discourse of the text is divided into introduction, five chapters and conclusion. Throughout the discussion expansive around the connection between Judicial function and Social Management system, to see what’s the future trend of the connection between Administration of Justice and Social Management from a practical view. In the Introduction, it mainly combs on the conception of Judicature and Social Management related to academic research achievements, and explains on the research object of this paper, research methods and research framework.In Chapter Ⅰ, it describes the present configuration mode of Judicial organs, bases on the seven basic task, combine with Judicial functions,it sets up the basic connection between Social Management and Administration of Justice in the political background.In Chapter Ⅱ, through the analysis of sample, it deeply discusses every connection between Administration of Justice and Social Management. In the same time, it points out some problems in it from a practical view. This connection contains five aspects, which including the maintenance and protection of public order, the maintenance and protection of the economic order, the resolve and coordination of social conflicts, the impact and control the social relations, and the influence and promote system changes. Then it points out the connection’s influence to Administration of Justice and Social Management.In Chapter Ⅲ, it focuses on elevating the level of theory on Administration of Justice and Social Management. It analysis the natural goal of this participation, discusses the elucidation of the goal by analyzing the social psychological tendency and the reality of Jud Judicature demand perspective. It explores the role in the promotion of justice for the operation and improvement of the system. Combining with the guidance on Criminal and Civil trials, it analysis the fair pursuit of justice from the point of view of social fairness and justice, then points out that the construction of the Judicature and Social Management, should be the rule of law as the leading mode.In Chapter Ⅳ, it mainly discusses the most important problem of the connection, which is the value orient of the participation. Combines with the analysis of the K City Intermediate People’s Court of samples, it describes the establishment of the value orient. Then it discusses the lack of national management capacity in order to establish the inevitability of social self-management. Through the example of road traffic planning, it points out that the Administration of Justice should adhere to the ethical bottom line.In Chapter Ⅴ, relying on the analysis of the sample of K City Intermediate People’s Court, and the description of the Civil Society of the K city, it interprets the connection from a practical view. It proposes the plans of the standardization of Judicial behavior and the trial performance evaluation system. These measures promote the mutual trust between the Judicature and society, and enhance the ability of Judicature. It demonstrates the need of the growth of Civil Society. Till now, this article already completed a descriptive analysis of the connection, and provided realistic solutions for the main problems.In the Conclusion, combining with the limited of Judicature and Judicial activism, further discusses the ultimate value of the participation, which assuming the ultimate goal is to assist the Civil Society’s own growth and maturation, the Social Management of Administration of Justice should change from "social management" to "social assistance". It analyzes the relationship between the state and society through the metaphor of the balance. It also defines the value of the participation and sets up the trend in the future.It summary points out that in the relationship between Social Management and Administration of Justice, Judicature should eventually leave. This chapter expresses understanding of the current system settings from a social reality view. It also points out that Judicial participation in Social Management is not a long-term pursuit of Judicature, and the relationship between the Administration of Justice and Social Management will eventually move towards separation along with the growth of Civil Society.更多还原