【作者】 白昭薰；

【导师】 王贵祥；

【作者基本信息】 清华大学 ， 建筑学， 2013， 博士

【摘要】 明朝与朝鲜王朝在政治与文化方面有过广泛的交流，在建筑方面也存在许多类似之处，让我们猜测当时中韩两国建筑的文化、技术及制度方面有过一定程度的交流。这种影响关系尤其在两国共同经历过的全国性城市建设运动中有明显的体现，而且不同城市之间出现的类似性和规律性，让我们推测两国的城市建设都是按某种统一的规制而进行的。本论文以明朝与朝鲜王朝的地方城市及其配套建筑为对象，分析两国地方城市各自的特点和规制，并探讨两者之间的影响关系。第一章是绪论，绪论主要介绍选题背景、研究范围、研究方法、相关历史资料及现有的研究成果。第二章探讨城市。本章主要对比明朝的平原城市与朝鲜王朝的山区城市，并分析古人的城市建设理论，来查明朝鲜王朝地方城市平面模式的形成过程和特点。第三章探讨地方衙署。本章主要根据地方志和图纸资料，对两国不同级别的地方衙署进行了平面分析。另外，通过各种间接分析方法，来推断衙署建筑的模式和不同等级衙署之间的建筑等级次序。第四章探讨地方馆舍。在明朝的地方城市中，馆舍一般位于当地衙署内部。然而，朝鲜王朝地方馆舍则独立于当地衙署。本章分析两国地方行政组织的特点来查明了其原因。第五章探讨坛庙。坛庙不同于衙署，涉及到封建社会的礼仪制度，其建设制度很严格，特别讲究形式。本章主要查明朝鲜王朝遇到在中韩两国历代坛庙制度的矛盾，如何制定了自己的坛庙建设制度。第六章探讨庙学。朝鲜王朝地方庙学的建筑模式是基于中国历代中央庙学的建筑制度而简化的。本章主要分析了两国地方庙学对祭祀用的“庙”和教学用的“学”的两大功能的区分方式。第七章是本研究的结论部分。本章总结了两国地方城市及建筑的规制和特点，并解释了影响关系。更多还原

【Abstract】 The Ming Dynasty and the Chosun Dynasty had extensive exchanges in thepolitical and cultural aspects, so many similarities bwtween two countries make usguess the two countries also had a certain degree of exchange in the architecturalculture, technology and institutional aspects. Eespecially they had experienced similarnational-wide city construction movements, and the similarities and regularitiesamong the cities, let us speculate their city construction might had been carried outaccording to a unified regulation of its country itself.This thesis researches the local cities and their sets of ancillary buildings of twodynasties, analyzes their own characteristics and regulaties of local cities, and findsout the influence between the two different systems.The first chapter introduces the research background, scope, method, historicaldata and other related researches.The second chapter is about their cities. This chapter mainly compares plaincities in the Ming Dynasty and mountain cities in the Chousn Dynasty, and analyzesthe theory of city construction, to ascertain the forming process and characteristics oftheir local city systems.The third chapter is about the local government buildings. This chapter mainlyanalyzes the architectural plains of local governments at all levels in the localchronicles and their attached drawings, and finds out the architectural model andpattern through various indirect analysisThe fourth chapter is about the local official guest house. In the Ming Dynasty,they usually were placed in their local government building. On the contrary, thelocal official guest houses of the Chosun Dynasty were independent of localgovernment buildings. This chapter analyzes the local administrative organizations ofthe two dynasties to find the reason.The fifth chapter is about the local offical altars and temples. Different from thegovernment budldings, the local offical altars and temples were related to theetiquette system, theri construction system was very strict and paid much attention totheir architectural form and size. This chapter focuses on how the Chosun Dynasty made its own architectural systems of various offical local altars and temples afterfinding out its own systems were different from the Ming Dynasty’s new officalsystem.The sixth chapter is about the local temple school. The architectural model of thelocal temple schools in the Chosun Dynasty was made based on several templeschools in the ancient China. This chapter analyzes how to combine temple sectionand school section in one architectural complex.The seventh chapter is the conclusion. It summarizes the architectural featureand rugulation of local cities and their ancillary buildings in two countries, andexplain the relationship and influence among them.更多还原