节点文献
唐宋類書引《國語》研究
【作者】 郭萬青；
【导师】 方向東；
【作者基本信息】 南京师范大学 ， 中國古典文獻學， 2013， 博士
【摘要】 《国语》的研究历来薄弱,近年来研究者较多,但许多问题仍需要深入探讨,《国语》文本也需要进一步整理。《玉烛宝典》、《北堂书钞》、《艺文类聚》、《韦书治要》、《初学记》、《白氏六帖事类集》、《太平御览》、《册府元龟》等八部类书的编纂时间为隋唐以及北宋早期,且多部类书如《白氏六帖事类集》、《艺文类聚》、《太平御览））．《册府元龟》等皆有宋刻本传世。其编纂时间早於明道本、公序本的刊刻时间,多部类书的刊刻时间也早於今传《国语》的多个版本。类书中徵引《国语》较多,可斗与今传《国语》比较。又类书引及《国语》多家注,凡此为进一步整理、研究《国语》以及韦注提供了资料和视角。本文分为引言、《玉烛宝典》引《国语》校证、《北堂书钞》引《国语》校证、《艺文类聚》引《国语》校证、《基书治要》引《国语》校证、《初学记》引《国语》校证、《白氏六帖事类集》引《国语》校证、《太平御览》引《国语》校证、《册府元龟》引《国语》校证、结语等十个部分。引言分为《国语》研究的回顾与前瞻、唐宋类书引《国语》研究的价值和意义、国内外关於该课题的研究现状等。其他八个部分以编纂时间为顺序,顺次考察八部类书徵引《国语》的基本情况。每部类书可分为类书本体分析、类书徵引《国语》简说、类书徵引《国语》本文与今传《国语》本文比勘、类书徵引《国语》旧注与今传《国语》韦注比勘、类书徵引‘《国语》语段与相同内容秦汉传世文献比勘等几个部分。其中涉及到古籍写刻字形以及相关文字问题、类书驮及《国语》各本的校勘、《国语》各本的关系、《国语》及相关典籍语义训诂等问题。希望对各类书和《国语》的进一步整理与研究有所帮助。
【Abstract】 GuoYu’s research has always been weak. Although there were many reachers in recent years,many problems still need further discussion and GuoYu’s text needs to be further consolidation.The eight Leibooks were Yuzhubaodian,Beitangshuchao,Yiwenleiju,QunshuZhiyao, Chuxueji,Baishiliutieshileiji,Taipingyulan,and Cefuyuangui,these books were compilated in the the Sui and Tang Dynasties and the early Northern Song Dynasty and several of these books such as Baishiliutieshileiji, Yiwenleiju, Taipingyulan, Cefuyuangui have handed down the song edition.The compilation time is earlier than Mingdaoben and Gongxuben’s publication of GuoYu. These books cited more texts of GuoYu and those cited texts of books could compared with the text of GuoYu.It provides data for further study of GuoYu.The artical is divided into introduction, cited texts of reasearch and the conclusion.The introduction is divided into GuoYu’s research review and outlook, the value of Tang and song books cited GuoYu, present research of domestic and foreign. The other eight parts reasearch the basic situation about the texts these book cited GuoYu. Each category can be divided into books ontology analysis, comparison of cited text from GuoYu’s text, comparison of notes in cited texts from GuoYu’s notes, comparison of cited texts from the same content of books in Qin Dynasty or Han Dynasty. Which relates to the ancient written form and related problems, collation of these eight books and GuoYu, relationship of GuoYu’s edition, interpretation of GuoYu and related books. We hope the artical helps further collection and research of Leishu and GuoYu.