【作者】 王立兵；

【导师】 杨震；

【作者基本信息】 黑龙江大学 ， 民商法学， 2012， 博士

【摘要】 大规模侵权问题因其复杂性与救济的困境日益引起关注。《侵权责任法》的单一损害赔偿思路很难满足众多受害人的救济需要，并且法官的资源、能力和角色也很难胜任处理该类纠纷。在实践中，我国形成了所谓“行政主导”模式。该模式蕴含着国家救济责任。从制度供需关系以及比较法视角看，应当在法治化与适度救济的前提下肯定该模式的合理性和正当性。国家救济责任主要包括国家补偿责任和救济途径提供责任，分别对应不同的机制。补偿责任以人身伤害补偿为原则，排除精神损害；但必要的财产权和纯经济损失也可以补偿；在提供救济途径方面，主要体现为行政处理机制，由行政斡旋、行政调解、行政仲裁和行政裁决构成，并以行政调解和行政仲裁为主。更多还原

【Abstract】 The problem of mass tort takes into our attention, with its complexity and therelief of distress.“The tort liability law” can not meet the need of our relieving hundredand thounds of victims relief needs, because it is based on the premise of one versus one.And it is very difficult to the judges to settle the kind of diputes, because of their lack ofsufficient settlement resources, capabilities and their passive roles.In practice, our country has formed the so-called“administrative dominant model”,which contains the ideal of national relief responsibility. From the view of therelationship between supply and demand of the systems and comparative law, we shouldconfirm the legitimacy and reason of the model based on the pre-condition of the idealof rule of law and moderate relief. National relief responsibility mainly includes thenational compensation liability and responsibility of providing relief ways, withresponding mechanism. The liability of compensation means that nation compensatesthe injured for their personal injuries in principle, and excludes the mental damages; butthe necessary property damages and economic loss can also be compensated. As to theresponsibility of providing relief ways, it mainly names the administrative settlementmechanism： administrative intervention, administrative mediation, administrativearbitration and administrative adjudication, and administrative mediation andadministrative arbitration are prior to be adopted.更多还原