【作者】 范为；

【导师】 衣俊卿；

【作者基本信息】 黑龙江大学 ， 国外马克思主义研究， 2012， 博士

【摘要】 阿格尼丝·赫勒是布达佩斯学派的主要代表人物，她的研究领域颇为广泛，包括人的本能、需要、日常生活和历史等诸多方面。在她学术生涯的后期，她把目光转向了历史哲学领域，她的历史哲学继承了黑格尔、马克思和柯林伍德等人的思想，进而提出了一种带有后现代特征的历史哲学。她的历史哲学思想主要体现在《历史理论》、《碎片化的历史哲学》、《现代性理论》这三本著作之中。她对历史哲学的研究可以分为两个阶段。第一个阶段是她的历史哲学的萌芽期，此时的赫勒一方面像柯林伍德一样，把哲学的思考方式引入到历史学的研究之中把两者结合起来进行思考，另一方面又对历史学与历史哲学的一些概念进行了区分；第二个阶段赫勒把她对历史哲学的理解与她对现代性的反思结合在一起，提出了一种碎片化的历史哲学，并且在这一阶段发展的后期，赫勒又对现代性的诸多问题进行了分析和批判，通过这种批判来反思现代社会中人类面临的困境。赫勒在写作《历史理论》时期就已经对宏大叙事的历史哲学产生了不满,希望能够对其进行完善，使之能够避免受到错误意识的影响，更好地完成反思过去，思考未来的任务。但是那时的赫勒还没有把微观视域引入历史研究领域，所以她也就无法提出一种新的历史哲学以取代宏大叙事的历史哲学。在《碎片化的历史哲学》一书中，赫勒受到了后现代主义的影响，并且开始引入微观视域来研究历史。在《现代性理论》一书中，赫勒继续使用微观视域来审视现代性，对现代性的诸多问题进行了细致地批判。她的历史哲学既不同于思辨的历史哲学，也不同于分析的历史哲学，而是一种现代性批判的历史哲学。本文试图通过对赫勒历史哲学思想的梳理，来挖掘其历史哲学思想的学术价值及其理论意义。更多还原

【Abstract】 Agnes Heller is the main representative of the school in Budapest,Her researchfield is quite extensive,including the instinct of people,needs,daily life and history. Inthe latter part of her academic career, she turned to the field of philosophy of history.Herphilosophy of history inherited the thinking of Hegel,Marx and Collingwood.She raisedone kind with the modern features of the history of philosophy.Her history ofphilosophy is reflected in the <A Ttheory of history>,<A Philosophy of History inFragments>,<A Theory of Modernity>.Her philosophy of history can be divided into the development of two phases.Thefirst stage is the infancy of her philosophy of history, in one hand Heller inheritedCollingwood, combined philosophical thinking with historic study,in the otherhand,make a distinction between concepts of history and philosophy of history. In thesecond stage,Heller combined understanding of the philosophy of history with herreflection of modernity,supposed a philosophy of history in fragments,and in the latterof the second stage,Heller starting to analysis and criticism modernity, and according tothe criticism reflect on humanity difficulties.In the period of writing <A Theory of history>, Heller has not contented with thephilosophy of history on the grand narrative,she hope to perfect it, in order to avoidthe impact of false consciousness, to better finished the task of reflect on the past andthinking about the future. But Heller had been not utilized microscopic vision into thefield of historical research, so she can not be able to propose a new philosophy ofhistory to replace the grand narrative of the history of philosophy.In the book of <APhilosophy of History in Fragments>,Heller has been influented by postmodernism,and she has utilized microscopic vision to study history. In the<A Theory ofModernity>, Heller continue to use microscopic vision to examine the modernity,tomake a detailed criticism for many problems in modernity. Her philosophy of history is different from the speculative philosophy of history is also different from the analysisof the history of philosophy, But a philosophy of history of modernity critique.This paper attempts the comb on the history of philosophy of Heller, to exploit itsacademic value of the history of philosophy and its theoretical significance.更多还原