【作者】 刘晔明；

【导师】 周惠明； 傅贤治；

【作者基本信息】 江南大学 ， 食品贸易与文化， 2011， 博士

【摘要】 本文依据微观经济学、计量经济学、管理学等理论,结合实地调研,对食品产业绿色供应链管理模式与绩效评价进行了分析与研究。全文包括导言共分七章,主要论述了三部分内容:第一部分包涵了1-2章。这部分主要研究了食品产业绿色供应链管理模式的基本内涵、集成模型与发展现状,并对食品产业绿色供应链管理模式和传统供应链管理模式进行了比较分析,认为传统供应链管理模式向着绿色供应链管理模式发展是必然的。第二部分包涵了3-4章。这部分主要依据博弈论,分析了外部性因素、信息不对称和成员自私性行为等因素构成食品产业绿色供应链发展制约因素的机理。政府解决信息不对称引发的负内部性制约因素和逆向选择制约因素的机制可以分为以下两个方面:一是提供公共信息,二是直接管制虚假信息行为。而解决成员自私性行为和负外部性制约因素的机制可分为以下三种:政府补贴机制、直接管制和社会准则。最后通过供应商选择和信息共享两方面研究了食品产业绿色供应链管理模式成员协调机制,认为交货提前期、交货可靠度、产品价格、供应商物流水平、产品质量和绿色度6个因素是食品产业绿色供应链管理模式供应商评价指标的关键因素,并基于熵权-TOPSIS模型,建立了绿色供应链管理模式供应商评价模型。第三部分包涵了5-6章。这部分首先构建了“输入-输出型”食品产业绿色供应链管理模式绩效评价体系,结合具有锥结构的综合DEA模型,对食品产业绿色供应链管理模式和传统供应链管理模式进行了绩效评价。分析表明:传统供应链模式相比,绿色供应链管理模式在整体有效性、技术有效性和规模有效性三个方面效果更突出。食品产业传统供应链管理模式由于其整体效率不高,获取规模利润能力低,但是可以获取结构利润,所以在一定时间内,它仍将存在并不断沿着绿色供应链管理模式的方向发展,这一点是与目前食品产业的实际情形相吻合的。更多还原

【Abstract】 Based on microeconomics, econometrics, management and other theories, this article analyzes and studies the food industry green supply chain management and performance evaluation with field research. Full-text is divided into seven chapters, including introduction, and mainly discusses the three sections:The first part includes the chapter 1 and 2. This part mainly studies the basic content, the integrated model and the development status of the food industry green supply chain management. It also compares the food industry green supply chain management with the traditional supply chain management model and considers it is inevitable that the traditional supply chain management will go towards the development of green supply chain management.The second part includes the chapters 3 and 4. According to game theory, this part mainly analyzes the development constraints’mechanism of the food industry green supply chain. The development constraints are consisted of the external factors, asymmetric information, the selfish behavior of the members and other factors. For the resolution mechanism of the constraints of negative internal resistance and adverse selection which are caused by the information asymmetry, the government can intervene in two ways: provides the public information and directly controls the false information behavior. For the selfish behavior of members and the negative externalities, the government can solve the problems in three ways: direct government regulation, the social norms, the government subsidy mechanism. Finally, this part studies the members’coordination mechanisms of the food industry green supply chain management mode by two aspects of vendor selection and information-sharing. It considers that the key factors of the providers’evaluation are consisted of six factors: delivery lead time, delivery reliability, product prices, suppliers’logistics, product quality and green degree. And based on entropy-TOPSIS model, this part constructs a supplier evaluation model of the green supply chain management model.The third part includes the chapter 5 and 6. This part first constructes the performance evaluation system of the "input - output" food industry green supply chain management, and evaluates the performance of the food industry green supply chain management and the traditional supply chain management model by combining with the integrated DEA model with a cone structure. The results show that: the green supply chain management mode is better than the traditional supply chain management mode in the three aspects: the overall effectiveness, the technical efficiency and the scale efficiency. The food industry traditional supply chain management is low efficiency as a whole, and it can not get the scale profits, but structure profits. It will continue to exist and go towards the direction of the green supply chain management within a certain time, which is in keeping with the actual situation of the current food industry.更多还原