【作者】 孙泽兵；

【导师】 程又中；

【作者基本信息】 华中师范大学 ， 国家治理与考选制度， 2011， 博士

【摘要】 党政领导干部竞争性选拔考试制度,是我国干部人事制度改革的产物,是各级党委(党组)及其组织人事部门,按照党管干部原则和德才兼备、以德为先要求,坚持民主、公开、竞争、择优,以考试为重要竞争方式选拔党政领导干部的一项新的制度安排。本文拟从制度创新的视角,运用制度创新理论(第一章)来透视我国党政领导干部竞争性选拔考试制度近30年的创新历程(第二章),分析阐述现行制度的主要特点及其结构体系以及制度实施过程中在考试资格、考试标准、考试方法、考试程序、考试监督、考试评价反馈等方面存在的制度缺陷,并从制度设计、制度实施、制度监督三个方面展开归因分析(第三章)。党政领导干部竞争性选拔考试制度的创新,必须借鉴我国古代科举考试制度的历史经验和民国文官考试制度的历史教训,充分吸收国外高级公务员选拔考试的有效手段和成功经验(第四章)。明古今之变,察中外之异,达现实之用。当前,党政领导干部竞争性选拔考试制度的创新,应从干部人事制度改革的大处着眼,从制度自身体系中的资格制度、标准制度、方法制度、程序制度、监督制度以及评价反馈制度等细微处着手,系统谋划,稳步推进,并从各项制度构建应遵循的原则和具体改进的措施两个维度,提出了制度创新的对策建议(第五章)。同时,列举了现行党政领导干部竞争性选拔考试制度创新的典型范例,为本文制度创新研究成果的可行性给出了部分实际例证(第六章)。总之,人类历史本身就是一部制度创新的历史,制度创新将成为21世纪人类社会发展的世界性课题。要保持党政领导干部竞争性选拔考试制度的生机与活力,就必须不断地进行制度创新。制度创新是推进党政领导干部竞争性选拔考试制度科学、规范、有效建构的重要保证。更多还原

【Abstract】 The competitive examination system for cadre selection of party and government at all levels came out as a result of pesonnel system reform in our country. It is a new system arragement which is carried out by party comittees and their personnel departments at all levels according to two requirements that the cardres must possess both competence and merit, especially merit, and also be appointed by the party, based on the principles of democracy, openness, competition, and selection of the excellent ones, with examination as an important competitve way to select cardes of party and government.This article tries to explore the 30-year innovation process of the competitive examination system for cadre selection in our country (chapter2) from the viewpoint of system innovation, with the theories of system innovation(chapterl) and analyze the main characters,struture and system of current system as well as the system defects in terms of qualification, standard, procedure, supervision and evaluation feedback of the examination which had been spotted in the practice of this system. At the same time, it will present out an attribution analysis of this system from three aspects, namely, the design, implementation, and supervision of it.(chapter3). Doubtlessly, if we want to have this competitive examination system for cadre selection innovated, it is a must to borrow experience from both the imperial examination system for talents selection in ancient China and the examination system for selecting high-ranking civil servants abroad. Bisides, it is quite necessary to draw lessons from the examination system for non-minitary officials selection of Republic of China (chapter4). Once we understand the differences between ancient and today as well as home and abroad, we can take advantage of them to help solve current problems. As for the innovation of the competitive examination system for cadre selection nowdays, it entails having a systematic arragement and a steady push by emphasizing the reform of personnel system in a macrol level while studying from the micro level in terms of qualification, standard, procedure, supervision and evaluation feedback of this system. Therefore, this article gives out its suggestions and countermesures for system innovation based on the principles which must be obeyed in the process of each system’s design as well as specific and concrete measures for improvement.(chapter5). Apart from what mentioned above, this article also shows us typical examples of innovation in the competitive examination system for cadre selection of party and government at present, which can act as a partial demonstration of the feasibility of the research results regarding system innovation argued in this paper.(chapter6)In a word, the history of human being is simultaneously a history of system innovation, and in 21st century, system innovation would become a worldwide research subject for the development of human society. In order to keep the flexibility and feasibility of the competitive examination system for cadre selection, it is necessary to get the system innovated continually and the system innovation is also an important guarantee to make the competitive examination system more scientific, standard, as well as efficient.更多还原