【作者】 赵阳；

【导师】 徐兴无；

【作者基本信息】 南京大学 ， 中国古代文学， 2010， 博士

【摘要】 本论文主要以扬州学派的文学思想为研究对象。论文选取乾隆至道光这一时期为研究背景,在考察学术与文学相互关系的基础上,深入细致地剖析汪中、凌廷堪、焦循、阮元等人在文学思想领域形成的典型命题,展现扬州学派文学思想的逻辑构成和文化内涵。本论文共分为五章。绪论中主要交待了课题的研究现状、存在问题,以及本文的研究方法和拟解决的问题。第一章主要解决了两个问题：一是对清代朴学和扬州学派的学术面目做了考论和整理；二是通过考察扬州学派对文与学、文与道、文与义理之间关系的认识和处理,展现他们文学观的独特之处。第二章主要以扬州学派的文学史观为研究对象。文中将扬州学派文学史观的文化根据和学理构成概括为“一纲三目”。并着重探讨了焦循“一代有一代之所胜”的形成,以及命题背后蕴含的文化精神和内涵。第三章主要考察了扬州学派以“性情论”为核心的创作文论。扬州学派的“性情论”是在对“性命”理论的基础上衍申出来的,并在近乎相似的学术体认过程中,出现了“性情论”与“性灵说”的分化,这主要体现在阮元和焦循的主张中。阮元的“性情论”,主张“性情之正”,强调对性情的规范性,而焦循的“性灵说”主张“人各一性”,重在提倡性情的独特性。第四章研究扬州学派的骈文观。扬州学派有强烈的文体意识,尤其表现在对骈文的推崇上。汪中、凌廷堪、阮元对此发论尤多。通过深入剖析汪中的“骈散兼论”、凌廷堪的“骈文正变说”,以及阮元的“文笔辨”,展现扬州学派骈文观的面貌和文化精神。第五章对扬州学派的文学思想的局限和地位做出总体评价。学术的介入,使得扬州学派的文学思想从内容和内涵等多个角度上都得到提升,但是也在诸多方面形成束缚和障碍。通过对扬州学派文学思想的独特风貌、理论价值,及独有的文化意蕴的典型观照,对他们在文学史上的地位作出恰当的评价。更多还原

【Abstract】 Literary thought of Yangzhou school is stated in this thesis mainly as research object. Based on the interrelation between studying scholarship and literature, choosing the period from Qianlong to Daoguang as historical background, typical statement developed by Wang Zhong, Ling Tingkan, Jiao Xun, Ruan Yuan, ect., in literary ideological field is analyzed in depth and detailedly, and logic composition and cultural connotation of literary thought of Yangzhou school can be shown.This dissertation is composed of five chapters as follows:Research status and existing problem of the subject are stated in the introduction, as well as research method and proposed solved issues of this thesis.The first chapter resolves two problems mainly:one is to study and systemize the academic information of Pu Xue in Qing Dynasty and Yangzhou School; the other one is to understand and dispose the relationship of culture and scholarship, culture and theory, as well as culture and principles through researching Yangzhou School, and also to show unique feature of their literary conception.In the second chapter, the conception of literature history of Yangzhou School is mainly described as research object. Cultural basis and theory composition of the conception of literature history of Yangzhou School are summarized as’one outline and three items’. And also, the formation of Jiao Xun’s theory, which states that every generation has the corresponding feature, is probed mainly, as well as cultural spirit and connotation implied in the topic.The third chapter focuses on literary creation conception that Disposition Conception is regarded as the core in Yangzhou School. Based on the description of’Life’ theory, ’Disposition Conception’ of Yangzhou School is derived. However, in the process of nearly the same academic understanding, the differentiation between’Disposition Conception’and’the soul said’ arises, which reflects in the view od Ruan Yuan and Jiao Xun mainly.’Nature Conception’ of Ruan Yuan advocates ’positive disposition’, and emphasis on normative of the nature. But’the soul said’ of Jiao Xun stands for ’the disposition of the individual’, focusing on promoting the uniqueness of the nature.The forth chapter researches Parallel prose conception of Yangzhou School. Yangzhou school has strong stylistic awareness, especially performing the esteem of Parallel Prose. Wang Zhong, Ling Ting Kan and Ruan Yuan make many comments about the said subject. Through analyzing’Pian San Jian Lun’ of Wang Zhong,’Pian wen zheng bian theory’of Ling Tingkan and’Writing Identification’ of Ruan Yuan in depth, the status and cultural spirit of Parallel Probe in Yangzhou School is shown.In the fifth chapter, the limitation and status of literary thought of Yangzhou School is evaluated generally. Academic intervention makes that literary thought of Yangzhou School has been extended in many aspects of content and connotation, but also has been restricted and blocked in the other aspects. Through comparing unique style, theoretical value, and unique cultural implication of literature thought of Yangzhou School, their status in the literary history is evaluated properly.更多还原