【作者】 吕约合；

【导师】 高富平；

【作者基本信息】 华东政法大学 ， 法律， 2009， 硕士

【摘要】 在计算机和互联网的技术推动之下,人类社会逐渐进入的知识经济时代。如今软件的自身特性已使得软件的功能脱离传统只对数学逻辑算法的实施,人类期望解决的大多问题或要实现一些功能都可借助计算机软件对计算机的操作来完成。计算机软件与计算机硬件之间角色转换已成必然,即硬件将逐渐成为软件功能实现的辅助工具。自20世纪60年代软件产业兴起开始,计算机软件法律保护问题越来越突出,如何保护计算机软件产权也已成为全球知识产权保护的重要内容,也成为法学界、政府以及软件产业界共同需要解决的难题。目前世界各国对计算机软件的保护通常采用以版权法保护为主导,辅之以专利法、商标法、商业秘密法等多种法律保护方法。鉴于计算机软件自身所具有的“作品性”和“功能性”以及其他一些特征,这几种保护模式表现出各有优缺点,如版权保护软件的表达,无法保护技术构思;专利可以保护技术构思,但是过大的保护强度、严格的审查标准和较长的审查期限使得它不适合软件领域发展的需要;商业秘密存在着很多技术问题和利益平衡问题。因此,至今人们还在寻求关于究竟什么才是最适当的计算机软件法律保护模式的答案。本文欲通过软件自身特性以及现行主要软件保护法律的比较分析基础上,探讨软件保护面临的困境以及突破困境的制度选择——建立计算机软件工业版权法律体系。全文共分四章:第一章主要介绍了计算机软件的发展历程和自身特性,然后分析了计算机软件法律保护的现状,接着探讨了探索新的法律保护模式的必要性,以此奠定下文继续分析的基础。第二章首先分析了三种计算机软件法律保护模式,然后通过比较分析的方法厘清不同法律保护模式各自的优势和缺陷。第三章主要通过对工业版权的论述以及对计算机工业版权与现行知识产权法体系如何协调的阐述,来论证工业版权法是计算机软件保护的理想法律保护模式,然后提出计算机软件保护的基本制度设计。第四章主要是结合我国实际提出我国计算机软件工业版权法律的立法指导思想,然后在此基础上初步构建起计算机软件工业版权法律的基本框架。更多还原

【Abstract】 Under the impetus of technology computer and internet, human society entersinto the era of knowledge economy gradually. Nowadays,not only the software canbe used in mathematical logical algorithm field ,but also can solve scores of problemsor achieve capabilities by computer operating after being installed into it.The role switching of software and hardware is ineluctable, which meanshardware will attach to software. Since 1960s the software industry have risen , theproblem of software protection has become more and more serious. Therefore it is animportant part of global intellectual property protection about how to protect theproperty right of software, as well as the difficult problem for jurisprudential circles,government and industrial circles to solve.At present, countries of the world adopt several kinds of legal protection methodsto protect software, its main legal protection mode is copyright law accompanied bypatent law, trade mark law and trade secret law, etc. However it still can not protectsoftware soundly because of software’s own features such as“a piece of writing”and“a tool”, as well as .other natures. They are all have its own pros and cons, forexample, copyright law protect the expression of software rather than its technicalconception; patent law can protect the technical conception of software, but itsexcessive intensity of protection, serious examination criteria and long examinationperiod make it unfit to stimulate the development of software industry; trade secretlaw could induce a good many technical and balance of interests problems. Therefore This article will discuss the dilemma of the software legal protection and thesystem choice of breakthrough on the basis of the natures of software and thediscussion of three main legal protection modes. It constitutes four chapters as follow:Chapter I: This part mainly introduces the brief history and the features ofsoftware firstly, and then analyzes the current situation of software legal protection,at last discuss the necessity to explore a new mode of legal protection mode, whichwill laid a good foundation for the following sections to analyze deeply.Chapter II: This part mainly discusses three legal protection mode and their ownpros and cons bycomparison and analysis.Chapter III: This part mainly demonstrate why the industrial copyright law is theideal legal protection mode by introducing the industrial copyright and analyzing thathow the industrial copyright assort with the current law system of intellectual property.And then the writer plot out a basic system design for software legal protection.Chapter IV: Put forward the guiding ideology for the lawmaking of softwareindustrial copyright legal protection of our country in terms of Chinese concretereality, and then try to primarily construct a basic framework for software industrialcopyright legal protection.更多还原