节点文献
民事诉讼补强证据规则研究
A Study on the Rule of Corroboration in Civil Litigation
【作者】 张洪;
【作者基本信息】 内蒙古大学 , 法律, 2014, 硕士
【摘要】 补强证据规则是证据法的重要规则,它是法定的证据制度,是自由心证的例外。补强证据规则是对有瑕疵的证据证明力的运用的限制,它除了是数量规则,更是质量规则。补强证据的证明对象与被补强证据具有重合性。在民事诉讼中,主要是针对文书证据的补强证据规则进行了规定。尽管我国相关立法对补强证据规则有一些规定,但有很多的问题,不利于补强证据规则的作用真正发挥。本文通过对英美法系和大陆法系立法中的法官强制提醒程序、补强程度以及证明标准在补强证据规则中的运用分析,以期在民事诉讼中更好地运用这些制度。论文从民事诉讼补强证据规则的概念入手,分析了民事诉讼补强证据规则的法理依据,探讨了两大法系主要国家的民事诉讼补强证据规则,在对我国民事诉讼补强证据规则的立法及其存在问题进行研究的基础上,提出了完善我国民事诉讼补强证据规则的建议,以期对我国民事诉讼证据立法有所裨益。
【Abstract】 The rule of corroboration is an important rule of the evidence system. This rule, which is an exception to the discretionary evaluation of evidence, is within the scope of the legal evidence system. It restricts the utilization of evidence from the probative force. It is not only a rule of quantity, but also a rule of quality. The objects of the corroborating evidence should be overlapped with the corroborated evidence to some degree. In civil litigation, there are merely stipulations concerning the rule of corroborating for the purpose of document evidence, which is different from that of the criminal litigation. Although there are some stipulations on the rule of corroboration in the legislation of China, quite a few problems exist and are unfavorable for the rule of corroboration to play a role in civil litigation. This thesis analyzes the legislation on the rule of corroboration in the two legal families, focusing on the procedure of judges’compulsory reminding, the corroborating degree of the rule of corroboration, and the utilization of standard of proof in the rule of corroboration. Starting from the concept of the rule of corroboration in civil litigation, the thesis analyzes the jurisprudential foundations of the rule of corroboration, expounds the rule in the major nations of the two legal families. And then, based on the study of China’s legislation on the rule and the existing problems, the thesis puts forwards suggestions for improving the rule of corroboration in civil litigation, aiming to better the legislation on evidence of civil litigation in China.
- 【网络出版投稿人】 内蒙古大学 【网络出版年期】2014年 09期
- 【分类号】D925.1
- 【下载频次】142