【作者】 陈丽丽；

【导师】 金顺女；

【作者基本信息】 延边大学 ， 亚非语言文学， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 韩、汉两大语法系统中的诸多让步表现形式对于韩中两种语言的学习者来说既是学习的重点同时也是难点。本文力图通过语用理论中“预设”理论来进行研究,以语言的实际应用为依托,对让步句进行剖析。第一章中从本体及对比的角度考察了韩中两国让步句的研究现状,发现以往的研究多立足于让步句在宏观系统中的被分类情况,或是从语义及句法的角度对让步复句进行整体的研究,或是单独针对某个让步接续词尾进行讨论,涉及语用方面的深入研究特别是对比研究还较为匮乏,因此从语用角度对两国让步句进行对比分析仍具备一定的价值。第二章中重点介绍本文研究所依据的理论——“预设理论”的相关概念,分类,指定本文研究所采纳的观点,从而为本文的研究提供了理论支持。第三章开始正式利用预设理论分别对韩中两国具有代表性的让步表现一一进行讨论。主要围绕预设理论所包含的“预设期待”、“期待否定”、“内含”三方面来剖析让步句在实际语言表达中所体现的特点。第四章则主要针对第三章的分析结果进行讨论,从命题的虚实；预设期待的出发点；让步句表达的目的及内在的情感；让步复句的前后分句是否构成对比项四方面来进行讨论,得出了韩中让步表现自身的特点以及两种语言的异同点。最后,结论部分对该论文进行通篇的整理,分析了对比的结果,得出结论。并找出在研究过程中存在的缺点与不足,以期能够在今后的学习中继续对该方面有所研究。更多还原

【Abstract】 The numerous kinds of concession’s performances in either Korean or Chinese Grammar System are the key and difficult point for the language learners who study both Korean and Chinese. This article managed to use the Presupposition Theory in Pragmatics to carry out the research, and based on the practical usages of language to analyze the concession clauses.In the first chapter, from the perspective of ontology and comparison between China and Korea’s current research situation, the author found that the previous studies mainly focused on the classification of concession clause in the macroscopic system. These studies either did the general studies of the concession clause from the semantic and syntactic perspective or just discussed a single concessive successive suffix. The in-depth research from the pragmatic aspects especially comparative study is relatively scarce. Therefore, from the perspective of pragmatics, the contrast analyses to the concession clauses in Chinese and Korean still have a certain value.Then in the second chapter, the author gave the literature review of the Presupposition Theory, and its related concepts and classifications, specified the viewpoint adopted by this article to provide the theoretical supports for this research.And in Chapter Three, the author uses the Presupposition Theory to discuss the representative concession clauses in Korean and Chinese respectively. On the basis of the three aspects of the Presupposition Theory, that is "presuppose expectations""denying expectations" and "containing", this article is carried out to analyze the embodied characteristics of concessive clauses in the actual language usages.In the forth chapter, according to the analysis results in the third chapter, discussed from the following four portions:proposition of excess and deficiency; the starting point of presuppose expectations; concessive clauses’ expression purposes and inner feelings; whether the clauses before and after the concessive clauses form contrastive items. The author found out the respective characteristics of Chinese and Korean concessions, and similarities and differences between the two languages.At last, in the conclusion part, after going through the whole passage, analyzing the results of contrastive, the author reach the conclusion and identify the shortcomings and deficiencies in the research process, as to be able to continue to study the research aspects in the future.更多还原