【作者】 黄贤君；

【导师】 宋剑华；

【作者基本信息】 暨南大学 ， 中国语言文学， 2012， 硕士

【副题名】“都市革命”视野下的《三家巷》与《子夜》比较论

【摘要】 《子夜》与《三家巷》是两部以全景图式，“史诗”笔法描绘二三十年代的中国都市革命历史的长篇经典。两者分别以上海、广州两座在中国近现代史上具有举足轻重影响的革命城市作为叙述场域，在“城市革命”描写比较匮乏的现当代文学史上，堪属难得之作。本选题以“欧阳山的《三家巷》与茅盾《子夜》”为研究对象，以“都市革命”视野进行观照，分别从相同的社会矛盾描写，相同的主体以及相同的城市空间描写三个方面对两者进行比较，从“都市革命”角度探究《三家巷》对《子夜》写作模式的继承性，以小见大地分析左翼传统对十七年革命文学创作的影响，以及不同时代对作家创作同一题材的内在规约，进而从“都市革命”角度去重新认识《三家巷》及《子夜》在现当代文学史上的地位。更多还原

【Abstract】 Both “The Midnight”&“Of the Three Lane” are long classicsdescribing the history of Chinese urban revolution in1920’s-1930’s withpanoramic view schema and epic technique. One story is set in Shanghai,theother one in Guangzhou. Both are revolution cities of consequence in Chinesemodern and contemporary history. These are rare good works that fulfill theemptiness of contemporary literature in “urban revolution” aspect. Thisessay will study “Of the Three Lane” by Ou Yangshan, and “The Midnight”by Mao Dun, comparing from the perspective of urban revolution, to look intosimilar social conflicts, subjects and city space. It debates if it ispossible to follow the writing model of “Of the Three Lane” and “TheMidnight” through the perspective of urban revolution, and analyzes the leftwing’s impact on the17years’ revolution literary creation from detailsto general view and different era’s internal restrictions for the sametopics, to sum up a refreshed view on their status in modern contemporaryliterature history through the perspective of urban revolution.更多还原