【摘要】 美国正试图重新解释联合国大会2758号决议，策动台湾参与国际组织问题，但未得到各国的普遍接受，不构成有权解释。中国认为2758号决议体现了一个中国原则，并得到了绝大多数联合国会员国的普遍接受，构成对2758号决议的有权解释。联合国大会当然有权解释2758号决议，联合国秘书长的解释也可以成为有权解释。从联合国大会的实践和秘书长一贯以来的立场可知，2758号决议体现一个中国原则是联合国的普遍共识。根据《维也纳条约法公约》第31—32条的规定，2758号决议可以适用文义解释、系统解释、目的解释、惯例解释和历史解释等多种解释方法。无论采用哪种方法解释2758号决议，都可以确证决议体现了一个中国原则,美国没有重新解释的任何空间。更多还原

【Abstract】 The United States has sought to reinterpret United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 in a manner that instigates Taiwan’s participation in international organizations.However, this interpretation has not gained widespread acceptance among the international community and lacks authoritative backing.China asserts that Resolution 2758 embodies the “one-China principle”, a position that has garnered broad support from the majority of United Nations member states, thus representing an authentic interpretation of the resolution.The United Nations General Assembly possesses the authority to interpret its resolutions, and the Secretary-General’s interpretations can also be deemed authoritative.Historical practices within the General Assembly and the consistent stance of the Secretary-General reinforce the view that Resolution 2758 reflects the “one-China principle”, which is recognized as a universal consensus among UN member states.According to Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, various interpretative methods-including literal, systematic, teleological, customary and historical interpretations—can be applied to Resolution 2758.Regardless of the interpretative approach employed, it remains evident that the resolution embodies the “one-China principle”, leaving no room for reinterpretation by the United States.更多还原